Loading…

Can a high red: Far red ratio replace temperature-induced inflorescence development in Phalaenopsis?

•Cooling to 19°C stimulates multiple inflorescences, regardless of the light spectrum.•A high R:FR ratio increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature.•Cooling to 19°C followed by 22°C increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, except under relatively l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental and experimental botany 2016-01, Vol.121, p.139-144
Main Authors: Dueck, Tom, Trouwborst, Govert, Hogewoning, Sander W., Meinen, Esther
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-76a9b73734790221b95c0e7aa52e2a2e6bd40e4255dc0d8ca22179e0a0b9eaf03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-76a9b73734790221b95c0e7aa52e2a2e6bd40e4255dc0d8ca22179e0a0b9eaf03
container_end_page 144
container_issue
container_start_page 139
container_title Environmental and experimental botany
container_volume 121
creator Dueck, Tom
Trouwborst, Govert
Hogewoning, Sander W.
Meinen, Esther
description •Cooling to 19°C stimulates multiple inflorescences, regardless of the light spectrum.•A high R:FR ratio increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature.•Cooling to 19°C followed by 22°C increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, except under relatively low R:FR ratio’s.•Temperature and/or light spectrum is more important during the second than the first part of induction. Phalaenopsis is one of the most economically important ornamental crops in the Netherlands, but due to its growth requirements during its various developmental stages, it is a costly crop to grow in terms of energy. Warming the greenhouse in the winter during the vegetative phase, and cooling the greenhouse to 19°C in the summer to induce flowering costs a great deal of energy. Because flower induction is primarily controlled by altering the balance of plant hormones, it might well be possible to steer flower induction by changing the light spectrum instead of changing the temperature. The objective of the present study was to investigate the role of the light spectrum on bud break and inflorescence elongation in Phalaenopsis. To this end an experiment was designed with two Phalaenopsis cultivars, Quincy and Red Stones in a matrix of temperature and spectral treatments. Light treatments were used with a relatively high red to far-red ratio (R:FR) and therefore a high phytochrome photostationary state (PSS) value of 0.85, and with a relatively lower R:FR ratio resulting in a PSS value of 0.71, similar to that of natural daylight. Our hypothesis was that low temperature treatments can, at least partially, be substituted by a light spectrum with a high PSS value in order to suppress apical dominance of the primary flowering inflorescence and thus realize multiple inflorescences. A cooling period (19°C) of 8 weeks always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, both from Red Stones as well as Quincy. This implies that a flower induction period of 8 weeks with cooling is effective, regardless of the light spectrum. An induction period of 8 weeks with “red light” always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature (19 or 22°C). A cooling period (19°C) of 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks 22°C only resulted in a higher percentage of multiple inflorescences under the light spectrum with a high PSS value during the second 4 week-period. This suggests that the plant hormones responsible for bud break
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_wagen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_489190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0098847215000945</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0098847215000945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-76a9b73734790221b95c0e7aa52e2a2e6bd40e4255dc0d8ca22179e0a0b9eaf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1q3DAQhUVpodu0zxC_gDcj-Ud2bkpYkrQQSCDNtRhL410tXslI3k3y9pXY0NvCoBmk78xIR4xdclhz4O3Vfk3uRG_z4Je1AN6sIQXnn9iKd7IqZQXyM1sB9F3Z1VJ8Zd9i3AOArGS7YmaDrsBiZ7e7IpC5Lu4w5KIIuFifqnlCTcVCh5nS1jFQaZ056kRYN04-UNTkEmHoRJOfD-SWdFI87XBCcn6ONv78zr6MOEX68ZEv2Mvd7Z_Nr_Lh8f735uah1I1ol1K22A_pWlUtexCCD32jgSRiI0igoHYwNVAtmsZoMJ3GxMieAGHoCUeoLtj1ue8rbslZlxblMGgblUerJjsEDO_q9RiUm3Kaj0NUddfzPovlWayDjzHQqOZgD5nnoLLTaq_-Oa2y0wpScJ6Ul2fliF7hNqRxL88JaAHyF4jc--ZMUHr9yVJQUdtsm7GB9KKMt_-d8hdX3Zgr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a high red: Far red ratio replace temperature-induced inflorescence development in Phalaenopsis?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Dueck, Tom ; Trouwborst, Govert ; Hogewoning, Sander W. ; Meinen, Esther</creator><creatorcontrib>Dueck, Tom ; Trouwborst, Govert ; Hogewoning, Sander W. ; Meinen, Esther</creatorcontrib><description>•Cooling to 19°C stimulates multiple inflorescences, regardless of the light spectrum.•A high R:FR ratio increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature.•Cooling to 19°C followed by 22°C increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, except under relatively low R:FR ratio’s.•Temperature and/or light spectrum is more important during the second than the first part of induction. Phalaenopsis is one of the most economically important ornamental crops in the Netherlands, but due to its growth requirements during its various developmental stages, it is a costly crop to grow in terms of energy. Warming the greenhouse in the winter during the vegetative phase, and cooling the greenhouse to 19°C in the summer to induce flowering costs a great deal of energy. Because flower induction is primarily controlled by altering the balance of plant hormones, it might well be possible to steer flower induction by changing the light spectrum instead of changing the temperature. The objective of the present study was to investigate the role of the light spectrum on bud break and inflorescence elongation in Phalaenopsis. To this end an experiment was designed with two Phalaenopsis cultivars, Quincy and Red Stones in a matrix of temperature and spectral treatments. Light treatments were used with a relatively high red to far-red ratio (R:FR) and therefore a high phytochrome photostationary state (PSS) value of 0.85, and with a relatively lower R:FR ratio resulting in a PSS value of 0.71, similar to that of natural daylight. Our hypothesis was that low temperature treatments can, at least partially, be substituted by a light spectrum with a high PSS value in order to suppress apical dominance of the primary flowering inflorescence and thus realize multiple inflorescences. A cooling period (19°C) of 8 weeks always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, both from Red Stones as well as Quincy. This implies that a flower induction period of 8 weeks with cooling is effective, regardless of the light spectrum. An induction period of 8 weeks with “red light” always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature (19 or 22°C). A cooling period (19°C) of 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks 22°C only resulted in a higher percentage of multiple inflorescences under the light spectrum with a high PSS value during the second 4 week-period. This suggests that the plant hormones responsible for bud break and inflorescence elongation, can be stimulated by light with a high PSS value, as well as by a cool phase. In order to stimulate multiple flowering inflorescences, the temperature and/or light spectrum during the second 4-week-period appears to be more important than during the first 4-week-period of the induction phase. Presumably this is due to suppression of the apical dominance of the first emerging inflorescence by low temperature and/or relatively high R:FR ratio during this phase. This also implies that the energy costly cool-induction period during the summer can be replaced, at least in part, by red light or a relatively high R:FR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>apical dominance ; budbreak ; cooling ; cultivars ; developmental stages ; energy ; Far red light ; flowering ; global warming ; greenhouses ; Inflorescence induction ; inflorescences ; ornamental plants ; Phalaenopsis ; phytochrome ; Phytochrome photostationary state ; plant hormones ; R:FR ratio ; Red light ; summer ; temperature ; winter ; WUR GTB Teelt &amp; Bedrijfssystemen</subject><ispartof>Environmental and experimental botany, 2016-01, Vol.121, p.139-144</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Wageningen University &amp; Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-76a9b73734790221b95c0e7aa52e2a2e6bd40e4255dc0d8ca22179e0a0b9eaf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-76a9b73734790221b95c0e7aa52e2a2e6bd40e4255dc0d8ca22179e0a0b9eaf03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dueck, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouwborst, Govert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogewoning, Sander W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinen, Esther</creatorcontrib><title>Can a high red: Far red ratio replace temperature-induced inflorescence development in Phalaenopsis?</title><title>Environmental and experimental botany</title><description>•Cooling to 19°C stimulates multiple inflorescences, regardless of the light spectrum.•A high R:FR ratio increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature.•Cooling to 19°C followed by 22°C increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, except under relatively low R:FR ratio’s.•Temperature and/or light spectrum is more important during the second than the first part of induction. Phalaenopsis is one of the most economically important ornamental crops in the Netherlands, but due to its growth requirements during its various developmental stages, it is a costly crop to grow in terms of energy. Warming the greenhouse in the winter during the vegetative phase, and cooling the greenhouse to 19°C in the summer to induce flowering costs a great deal of energy. Because flower induction is primarily controlled by altering the balance of plant hormones, it might well be possible to steer flower induction by changing the light spectrum instead of changing the temperature. The objective of the present study was to investigate the role of the light spectrum on bud break and inflorescence elongation in Phalaenopsis. To this end an experiment was designed with two Phalaenopsis cultivars, Quincy and Red Stones in a matrix of temperature and spectral treatments. Light treatments were used with a relatively high red to far-red ratio (R:FR) and therefore a high phytochrome photostationary state (PSS) value of 0.85, and with a relatively lower R:FR ratio resulting in a PSS value of 0.71, similar to that of natural daylight. Our hypothesis was that low temperature treatments can, at least partially, be substituted by a light spectrum with a high PSS value in order to suppress apical dominance of the primary flowering inflorescence and thus realize multiple inflorescences. A cooling period (19°C) of 8 weeks always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, both from Red Stones as well as Quincy. This implies that a flower induction period of 8 weeks with cooling is effective, regardless of the light spectrum. An induction period of 8 weeks with “red light” always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature (19 or 22°C). A cooling period (19°C) of 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks 22°C only resulted in a higher percentage of multiple inflorescences under the light spectrum with a high PSS value during the second 4 week-period. This suggests that the plant hormones responsible for bud break and inflorescence elongation, can be stimulated by light with a high PSS value, as well as by a cool phase. In order to stimulate multiple flowering inflorescences, the temperature and/or light spectrum during the second 4-week-period appears to be more important than during the first 4-week-period of the induction phase. Presumably this is due to suppression of the apical dominance of the first emerging inflorescence by low temperature and/or relatively high R:FR ratio during this phase. This also implies that the energy costly cool-induction period during the summer can be replaced, at least in part, by red light or a relatively high R:FR.</description><subject>apical dominance</subject><subject>budbreak</subject><subject>cooling</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>developmental stages</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Far red light</subject><subject>flowering</subject><subject>global warming</subject><subject>greenhouses</subject><subject>Inflorescence induction</subject><subject>inflorescences</subject><subject>ornamental plants</subject><subject>Phalaenopsis</subject><subject>phytochrome</subject><subject>Phytochrome photostationary state</subject><subject>plant hormones</subject><subject>R:FR ratio</subject><subject>Red light</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>winter</subject><subject>WUR GTB Teelt &amp; Bedrijfssystemen</subject><issn>0098-8472</issn><issn>1873-7307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkd1q3DAQhUVpodu0zxC_gDcj-Ud2bkpYkrQQSCDNtRhL410tXslI3k3y9pXY0NvCoBmk78xIR4xdclhz4O3Vfk3uRG_z4Je1AN6sIQXnn9iKd7IqZQXyM1sB9F3Z1VJ8Zd9i3AOArGS7YmaDrsBiZ7e7IpC5Lu4w5KIIuFifqnlCTcVCh5nS1jFQaZ056kRYN04-UNTkEmHoRJOfD-SWdFI87XBCcn6ONv78zr6MOEX68ZEv2Mvd7Z_Nr_Lh8f735uah1I1ol1K22A_pWlUtexCCD32jgSRiI0igoHYwNVAtmsZoMJ3GxMieAGHoCUeoLtj1ue8rbslZlxblMGgblUerJjsEDO_q9RiUm3Kaj0NUddfzPovlWayDjzHQqOZgD5nnoLLTaq_-Oa2y0wpScJ6Ul2fliF7hNqRxL88JaAHyF4jc--ZMUHr9yVJQUdtsm7GB9KKMt_-d8hdX3Zgr</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Dueck, Tom</creator><creator>Trouwborst, Govert</creator><creator>Hogewoning, Sander W.</creator><creator>Meinen, Esther</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>QVL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Can a high red: Far red ratio replace temperature-induced inflorescence development in Phalaenopsis?</title><author>Dueck, Tom ; Trouwborst, Govert ; Hogewoning, Sander W. ; Meinen, Esther</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-76a9b73734790221b95c0e7aa52e2a2e6bd40e4255dc0d8ca22179e0a0b9eaf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>apical dominance</topic><topic>budbreak</topic><topic>cooling</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>developmental stages</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Far red light</topic><topic>flowering</topic><topic>global warming</topic><topic>greenhouses</topic><topic>Inflorescence induction</topic><topic>inflorescences</topic><topic>ornamental plants</topic><topic>Phalaenopsis</topic><topic>phytochrome</topic><topic>Phytochrome photostationary state</topic><topic>plant hormones</topic><topic>R:FR ratio</topic><topic>Red light</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>winter</topic><topic>WUR GTB Teelt &amp; Bedrijfssystemen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dueck, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouwborst, Govert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogewoning, Sander W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinen, Esther</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>NARCIS:Publications</collection><jtitle>Environmental and experimental botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dueck, Tom</au><au>Trouwborst, Govert</au><au>Hogewoning, Sander W.</au><au>Meinen, Esther</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a high red: Far red ratio replace temperature-induced inflorescence development in Phalaenopsis?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental and experimental botany</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>139</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>139-144</pages><issn>0098-8472</issn><eissn>1873-7307</eissn><abstract>•Cooling to 19°C stimulates multiple inflorescences, regardless of the light spectrum.•A high R:FR ratio increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature.•Cooling to 19°C followed by 22°C increases the percentage of multiple inflorescences, except under relatively low R:FR ratio’s.•Temperature and/or light spectrum is more important during the second than the first part of induction. Phalaenopsis is one of the most economically important ornamental crops in the Netherlands, but due to its growth requirements during its various developmental stages, it is a costly crop to grow in terms of energy. Warming the greenhouse in the winter during the vegetative phase, and cooling the greenhouse to 19°C in the summer to induce flowering costs a great deal of energy. Because flower induction is primarily controlled by altering the balance of plant hormones, it might well be possible to steer flower induction by changing the light spectrum instead of changing the temperature. The objective of the present study was to investigate the role of the light spectrum on bud break and inflorescence elongation in Phalaenopsis. To this end an experiment was designed with two Phalaenopsis cultivars, Quincy and Red Stones in a matrix of temperature and spectral treatments. Light treatments were used with a relatively high red to far-red ratio (R:FR) and therefore a high phytochrome photostationary state (PSS) value of 0.85, and with a relatively lower R:FR ratio resulting in a PSS value of 0.71, similar to that of natural daylight. Our hypothesis was that low temperature treatments can, at least partially, be substituted by a light spectrum with a high PSS value in order to suppress apical dominance of the primary flowering inflorescence and thus realize multiple inflorescences. A cooling period (19°C) of 8 weeks always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, both from Red Stones as well as Quincy. This implies that a flower induction period of 8 weeks with cooling is effective, regardless of the light spectrum. An induction period of 8 weeks with “red light” always resulted in a high percentage of multiple inflorescences, regardless of the temperature (19 or 22°C). A cooling period (19°C) of 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks 22°C only resulted in a higher percentage of multiple inflorescences under the light spectrum with a high PSS value during the second 4 week-period. This suggests that the plant hormones responsible for bud break and inflorescence elongation, can be stimulated by light with a high PSS value, as well as by a cool phase. In order to stimulate multiple flowering inflorescences, the temperature and/or light spectrum during the second 4-week-period appears to be more important than during the first 4-week-period of the induction phase. Presumably this is due to suppression of the apical dominance of the first emerging inflorescence by low temperature and/or relatively high R:FR ratio during this phase. This also implies that the energy costly cool-induction period during the summer can be replaced, at least in part, by red light or a relatively high R:FR.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.011</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-8472
ispartof Environmental and experimental botany, 2016-01, Vol.121, p.139-144
issn 0098-8472
1873-7307
language eng
recordid cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_489190
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects apical dominance
budbreak
cooling
cultivars
developmental stages
energy
Far red light
flowering
global warming
greenhouses
Inflorescence induction
inflorescences
ornamental plants
Phalaenopsis
phytochrome
Phytochrome photostationary state
plant hormones
R:FR ratio
Red light
summer
temperature
winter
WUR GTB Teelt & Bedrijfssystemen
title Can a high red: Far red ratio replace temperature-induced inflorescence development in Phalaenopsis?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A41%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_wagen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20high%20red:%20Far%20red%20ratio%20replace%20temperature-induced%20inflorescence%20development%20in%20Phalaenopsis?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20and%20experimental%20botany&rft.au=Dueck,%20Tom&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=139-144&rft.issn=0098-8472&rft.eissn=1873-7307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.011&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_wagen%3ES0098847215000945%3C/elsevier_wagen%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-76a9b73734790221b95c0e7aa52e2a2e6bd40e4255dc0d8ca22179e0a0b9eaf03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true