Loading…

Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems

Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technolo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2017-10, Vol.61 (4), p.626-644
Main Author: Kebebe, E. G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523
container_end_page 644
container_issue 4
container_start_page 626
container_title The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
container_volume 61
creator Kebebe, E. G.
description Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8489.12223
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wagen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_526126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1945033309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1KxDAUhYsoqKNrtwHX1fw0aetuEHWUAUEU3IVMko7RNqlJq3bnO_iGPonpVNyazQ2X8x3O5STJEYInKL5TlLE8LbKiPEEYY7KV7P1ttuOfsCwtC_q4m-yH8AwhxBnDe4lbuD7oJ1crYPvOm844C4RVwFjpGg1M0wrZBeAq0Adj10AJ4wfQaflkXe3WRocoBY350ApI79rvz6_avOnQOfkCWu9ULzeeYQidbsJBslOJOujD3zlLHi4v7s8X6fL26vp8vkxllhOS5kzlFcEYYkoIRqJishA0I1TnLCO50kJApRHJsVZMUIQUpiIyhFVlgSgms-Rs8n0Xa21jcG25FV6awJ0wvDYrL_zA33vPbT2Otl8FTjFDmEX4eIJj_tc-3sKfXe9tzMtRmVFICIFlVJ1Oqnh2CF5XvPWmGV0R5GMlfCyAjwXwTSWRYL-hTK2H_-R8fjO_m8AfdF2R_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1945033309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EconLit with Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kebebe, E. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kebebe, E. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-985X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Dairy cattle ; Dairy farming ; Dairy technologies ; Developing countries ; Farmers ; Forage ; Households ; Impact evaluation ; Income ; LDCs ; Livestock ; Livestock production ; Nutrition ; Process engineering ; Productivity ; Profits ; Propensity ; Propensity score ; Rural communities ; Value analysis ; Value chain ; Weighting</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2017-10, Vol.61 (4), p.626-644</ispartof><rights>2017 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><rights>Wageningen University &amp; Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kebebe, E. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</title><title>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairy farming</subject><subject>Dairy technologies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Impact evaluation</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock production</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Process engineering</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Propensity</subject><subject>Propensity score</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Value analysis</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><subject>Weighting</subject><issn>1364-985X</issn><issn>1467-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1KxDAUhYsoqKNrtwHX1fw0aetuEHWUAUEU3IVMko7RNqlJq3bnO_iGPonpVNyazQ2X8x3O5STJEYInKL5TlLE8LbKiPEEYY7KV7P1ttuOfsCwtC_q4m-yH8AwhxBnDe4lbuD7oJ1crYPvOm844C4RVwFjpGg1M0wrZBeAq0Adj10AJ4wfQaflkXe3WRocoBY350ApI79rvz6_avOnQOfkCWu9ULzeeYQidbsJBslOJOujD3zlLHi4v7s8X6fL26vp8vkxllhOS5kzlFcEYYkoIRqJishA0I1TnLCO50kJApRHJsVZMUIQUpiIyhFVlgSgms-Rs8n0Xa21jcG25FV6awJ0wvDYrL_zA33vPbT2Otl8FTjFDmEX4eIJj_tc-3sKfXe9tzMtRmVFICIFlVJ1Oqnh2CF5XvPWmGV0R5GMlfCyAjwXwTSWRYL-hTK2H_-R8fjO_m8AfdF2R_Q</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Kebebe, E. G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>QVL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</title><author>Kebebe, E. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairy farming</topic><topic>Dairy technologies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Impact evaluation</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock production</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Process engineering</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Propensity</topic><topic>Propensity score</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Value analysis</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><topic>Weighting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kebebe, E. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>NARCIS:Publications</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kebebe, E. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>626-644</pages><issn>1364-985X</issn><eissn>1467-8489</eissn><abstract>Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8489.12223</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-985X
ispartof The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2017-10, Vol.61 (4), p.626-644
issn 1364-985X
1467-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_526126
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EconLit with Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agricultural production
Dairy cattle
Dairy farming
Dairy technologies
Developing countries
Farmers
Forage
Households
Impact evaluation
Income
LDCs
Livestock
Livestock production
Nutrition
Process engineering
Productivity
Profits
Propensity
Propensity score
Rural communities
Value analysis
Value chain
Weighting
title Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wagen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Household%20nutrition%20and%20income%20impacts%20of%20using%20dairy%20technologies%20in%20mixed%20crop%E2%80%93livestock%20production%20systems&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Kebebe,%20E.%20G.&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=626-644&rft.issn=1364-985X&rft.eissn=1467-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wagen%3E1945033309%3C/proquest_wagen%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1945033309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true