Loading…
Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems
Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technolo...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2017-10, Vol.61 (4), p.626-644 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523 |
container_end_page | 644 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 626 |
container_title | The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Kebebe, E. G. |
description | Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-8489.12223 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wagen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_526126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1945033309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1KxDAUhYsoqKNrtwHX1fw0aetuEHWUAUEU3IVMko7RNqlJq3bnO_iGPonpVNyazQ2X8x3O5STJEYInKL5TlLE8LbKiPEEYY7KV7P1ttuOfsCwtC_q4m-yH8AwhxBnDe4lbuD7oJ1crYPvOm844C4RVwFjpGg1M0wrZBeAq0Adj10AJ4wfQaflkXe3WRocoBY350ApI79rvz6_avOnQOfkCWu9ULzeeYQidbsJBslOJOujD3zlLHi4v7s8X6fL26vp8vkxllhOS5kzlFcEYYkoIRqJishA0I1TnLCO50kJApRHJsVZMUIQUpiIyhFVlgSgms-Rs8n0Xa21jcG25FV6awJ0wvDYrL_zA33vPbT2Otl8FTjFDmEX4eIJj_tc-3sKfXe9tzMtRmVFICIFlVJ1Oqnh2CF5XvPWmGV0R5GMlfCyAjwXwTSWRYL-hTK2H_-R8fjO_m8AfdF2R_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1945033309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EconLit with Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Kebebe, E. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kebebe, E. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-985X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Dairy cattle ; Dairy farming ; Dairy technologies ; Developing countries ; Farmers ; Forage ; Households ; Impact evaluation ; Income ; LDCs ; Livestock ; Livestock production ; Nutrition ; Process engineering ; Productivity ; Profits ; Propensity ; Propensity score ; Rural communities ; Value analysis ; Value chain ; Weighting</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2017-10, Vol.61 (4), p.626-644</ispartof><rights>2017 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><rights>Wageningen University & Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kebebe, E. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</title><title>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairy farming</subject><subject>Dairy technologies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Impact evaluation</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock production</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Process engineering</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Propensity</subject><subject>Propensity score</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Value analysis</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><subject>Weighting</subject><issn>1364-985X</issn><issn>1467-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1KxDAUhYsoqKNrtwHX1fw0aetuEHWUAUEU3IVMko7RNqlJq3bnO_iGPonpVNyazQ2X8x3O5STJEYInKL5TlLE8LbKiPEEYY7KV7P1ttuOfsCwtC_q4m-yH8AwhxBnDe4lbuD7oJ1crYPvOm844C4RVwFjpGg1M0wrZBeAq0Adj10AJ4wfQaflkXe3WRocoBY350ApI79rvz6_avOnQOfkCWu9ULzeeYQidbsJBslOJOujD3zlLHi4v7s8X6fL26vp8vkxllhOS5kzlFcEYYkoIRqJishA0I1TnLCO50kJApRHJsVZMUIQUpiIyhFVlgSgms-Rs8n0Xa21jcG25FV6awJ0wvDYrL_zA33vPbT2Otl8FTjFDmEX4eIJj_tc-3sKfXe9tzMtRmVFICIFlVJ1Oqnh2CF5XvPWmGV0R5GMlfCyAjwXwTSWRYL-hTK2H_-R8fjO_m8AfdF2R_Q</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Kebebe, E. G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>QVL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</title><author>Kebebe, E. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairy farming</topic><topic>Dairy technologies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Impact evaluation</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock production</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Process engineering</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Propensity</topic><topic>Propensity score</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Value analysis</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><topic>Weighting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kebebe, E. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>NARCIS:Publications</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kebebe, E. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>626-644</pages><issn>1364-985X</issn><eissn>1467-8489</eissn><abstract>Technologies like improved breeds of dairy cows and improved forages have the potential to significantly increase dairy cow productivity and farmers’ profits in developing countries. However, adoption of such technologies has been low in Ethiopia, despite numerous efforts to disseminate the technologies in the past. Some studies argue that adoption of technologies is low because welfare effects of the technologies could be insignificant or negative to certain groups of farmers. This article employed propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting estimator with regression adjustment to examine the difference in household nutrition and income between adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies in rural Ethiopia. We find that adoption of cross‐bred dairy cows and improved forages increases household nutrition and income. The significant household nutrition and income impact for adopters support the notion that many Ethiopian smallholders have not adopted dairy technologies because adopters and nonadopters of dairy technologies have inherent differences in welfare outcome potentials. The results suggest that interventions that enhance access to farm resources and address barriers to input and output value chains could improve adoption of dairy technologies.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8489.12223</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-985X |
ispartof | The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2017-10, Vol.61 (4), p.626-644 |
issn | 1364-985X 1467-8489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_526126 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EconLit with Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Agricultural production Dairy cattle Dairy farming Dairy technologies Developing countries Farmers Forage Households Impact evaluation Income LDCs Livestock Livestock production Nutrition Process engineering Productivity Profits Propensity Propensity score Rural communities Value analysis Value chain Weighting |
title | Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wagen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Household%20nutrition%20and%20income%20impacts%20of%20using%20dairy%20technologies%20in%20mixed%20crop%E2%80%93livestock%20production%20systems&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Kebebe,%20E.%20G.&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=626-644&rft.issn=1364-985X&rft.eissn=1467-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wagen%3E1945033309%3C/proquest_wagen%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-76d7f3220253321af6c8a5435e76437deaa0de1372ed6a511d25a6d736f981523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1945033309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |