Computational Intelligence Determines Effective Rationality

• Published in: International journal of automation and computing 2008, Vol.5 (1), p.63-66
• Main Author: Tsang, Edward P. K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Actuarial cost methods; Algorithms; CAE) and Design; Cider; Computation; Computer Applications; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD; Control; Decision making; Economic models; Economic theory; Economics; Engineering; Human beings; Impact analysis; Intelligence; Mechatronics; Robotics; Studies; Variables; 人工智能; 合理性; 有界推理; 计算机智能
• ISSN: 1476-8186; 1751-8520
• DOI: 10.1007/s11633-008-0063-6

Rationality is a fundamental concept in economics. Most researchers will accept that human beings are not fully rational. Herbert Simon suggested that we are ＂bounded rational＂. However, it is very difficult to quantify ＂bounded rationality＂, and therefore it is difficult to pinpoint its impact to all those economic theories that depend on the assumption of full rationality. Ariel Rubinstein proposed to model bounded rationality by explicitly specifying the decision makers＇ decision-making procedures. This paper takes a computational point of view to Rubinstein＇s approach. From a computational point of view, decision procedures can be encoded in algorithms and heuristics. We argue that, everything else being equal, the effective rationality of an agent is determined by its computational power - we refer to this as the computational intelligence determines effective rationality （CIDER） theory. This is not an attempt to propose a unifying definition of bounded rationality. It is merely a proposal of a computational point of view of bounded rationality. This way of interpreting bounded rationality enables us to （computationally） reason about economic systems when the full rationality assumption is relaxed.