Loading…

Simulation study of energy resolution with changing pixel size for radon monitor based on Topmetal-II- TPC

In this paper, we study how pixel size influences energy resolution for a proposed pixelated detector—a high sensitivity, low cost, and real-time radon monitor based on a Topmetal - II - time projection chamber (TPC). This monitor was designed to improve spatial resolution for detecting radon alpha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nuclear science and techniques 2019, Vol.30 (1), p.117-125, Article 16
Main Authors: Huang, Meng-Yao, Pei, Hua, Sun, Xiang-Ming, Zou, Shu-Guang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, we study how pixel size influences energy resolution for a proposed pixelated detector—a high sensitivity, low cost, and real-time radon monitor based on a Topmetal - II - time projection chamber (TPC). This monitor was designed to improve spatial resolution for detecting radon alpha particles using Topmetal - II - sensors assembled by a 0.35 μm CMOS integrated circuit process. Owing to concerns that small pixel size might have the side effect of worsening energy resolution due to lower signal-to-noise ratio, a Geant4-based simulation was used to investigate the dependence of energy resolution on pixel sizes ranging from 60 to 600 μm. A non-monotonic trend in this region shows the combined effect of pixel size and threshold on pixels, analyzed by introducing an empirical expression. Pixel noise contributes 50 keV full-width at half-maximum energy resolution for 400 μm pixel size at 1–4 σ threshold that is comparable to the energy resolution caused by energy fluctuations in the TPC ionization process ( ∼ 20 keV). The total energy resolution after combining both factors is estimated to be 54 keV for a pixel size of 400 μm at 1–4 σ threshold. The analysis presented in this paper would help choosing suitable pixel size for future pixelated detectors.
ISSN:1001-8042
2210-3147
DOI:10.1007/s41365-018-0532-8