Loading…

Encoding methods matching the 16 × 16 pixel CZT detector of a coded aperture gamma camera

With the advancements in nuclear energy, methods that can accurately obtain the spatial information of radioactive sources have become essential for nuclear energy safety. Coded aperture imaging technology is widely used because it provides two-dimensional distribution information of radioactive sou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nuclear science and techniques 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.82-89, Article 92
Main Authors: Shen, Xiao-Lei, Gong, Pin, Tang, Xiao-Bin, Zhang, Rui, Ma, Jin-Chao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:With the advancements in nuclear energy, methods that can accurately obtain the spatial information of radioactive sources have become essential for nuclear energy safety. Coded aperture imaging technology is widely used because it provides two-dimensional distribution information of radioactive sources. The coded array is a major component of a coded aperture gamma camera, and it affects the key performance parameters of the camera. Currently, commonly used coded arrays such as uniformly redundant arrays (URAs) and modified uniformly redundant arrays (MURAs) have prime numbers of rows or columns and may lead to wastage of detector pixels. A 16 × 16 coded array was designed on the basis of an existing 16 × 16 multi-pixel position-sensitive cadmium zinc telluride detector. The digital signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio of the point spread function at the center of the array is 25.67. Furthermore, Monte Carlo camera models and experimental devices based on rank-13 MURA and rank-16 URA have been constructed. With the same angular resolution, the field size of view under rank-16 URA is 1.53 times that of under rank-13 MURA. Simulations (Am-241, Co-57, Ir-192, Cs-137) and experiments (Co-57) are conducted to compare the imaging performance between rank-16 URA and rank-13 MURA. The contrast-to-noise ratio of the reconstructed image of the rank-16 array is great and only slightly lower than that of rank-13 MURA. However, as the photon energy increases, the gap becomes almost negligible.
ISSN:1001-8042
2210-3147
DOI:10.1007/s41365-020-00796-5