Loading…

Selecting scale factor of Bayesian multi-fidelity surrogate by minimizing posterior variance

The Bayesian Multi-Fidelity Surrogate (MFS) proposed by Kennedy and O'Hagan (KOH model) has been widely employed in engineering design, which builds the approximation by decomposing the high-fidelity function into a scaled low-fidelity model plus a discrepancy function. The scale factor before...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chinese journal of aeronautics 2022-11, Vol.35 (11), p.59-73
Main Authors: BU, Hongyan, SONG, Liming, GUO, Zhendong, LI, Jun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Bayesian Multi-Fidelity Surrogate (MFS) proposed by Kennedy and O'Hagan (KOH model) has been widely employed in engineering design, which builds the approximation by decomposing the high-fidelity function into a scaled low-fidelity model plus a discrepancy function. The scale factor before the low-fidelity function, ρ, plays a crucial role in the KOH model. This scale factor is always tuned by the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). However, recent studies reported that the MLE may sometimes result in MFS of bad accuracy. In this paper, we first present a detailed analysis of why MLE sometimes can lead to MFS of bad accuracy. This is because, the MLE overly emphasizes the variation of discrepancy function but ignores the function waviness when selecting ρ. To address the above issue, we propose an alternative approach that chooses ρ by minimizing the posterior variance of the discrepancy function. Through tests on a one-dimensional function, two high-dimensional functions, and a turbine blade design problem, the proposed approach shows better accuracy than or comparable accuracy to MLE, and the proposed approach is more robust than MLE. Additionally, through a comparative test on the design optimization of a turbine endwall cooling layout, the advantage of the proposed approach is further validated.
ISSN:1000-9361
DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2022.05.012