Loading…
Selecting scale factor of Bayesian multi-fidelity surrogate by minimizing posterior variance
The Bayesian Multi-Fidelity Surrogate (MFS) proposed by Kennedy and O'Hagan (KOH model) has been widely employed in engineering design, which builds the approximation by decomposing the high-fidelity function into a scaled low-fidelity model plus a discrepancy function. The scale factor before...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chinese journal of aeronautics 2022-11, Vol.35 (11), p.59-73 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Bayesian Multi-Fidelity Surrogate (MFS) proposed by Kennedy and O'Hagan (KOH model) has been widely employed in engineering design, which builds the approximation by decomposing the high-fidelity function into a scaled low-fidelity model plus a discrepancy function. The scale factor before the low-fidelity function, ρ, plays a crucial role in the KOH model. This scale factor is always tuned by the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). However, recent studies reported that the MLE may sometimes result in MFS of bad accuracy. In this paper, we first present a detailed analysis of why MLE sometimes can lead to MFS of bad accuracy. This is because, the MLE overly emphasizes the variation of discrepancy function but ignores the function waviness when selecting ρ. To address the above issue, we propose an alternative approach that chooses ρ by minimizing the posterior variance of the discrepancy function. Through tests on a one-dimensional function, two high-dimensional functions, and a turbine blade design problem, the proposed approach shows better accuracy than or comparable accuracy to MLE, and the proposed approach is more robust than MLE. Additionally, through a comparative test on the design optimization of a turbine endwall cooling layout, the advantage of the proposed approach is further validated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1000-9361 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cja.2022.05.012 |