Loading…

Enabling the use of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as electrolyte salt for Li‐ion batteries based on silicon anodes and Li(Ni0.4Co0.4Mn0.2)O2 cathodes by salt additives

Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) is a promising alternative salt for Li‐ion batteries. Unlike the conventional LiPF6, it is not prone to HF formation, and thus resistant to moisture. However, for cell voltages relevant for high energy cathodes (>4.2 V), the aluminium current col...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Batteries & supercaps 2024-06, Vol.7 (6), p.n/a
Main Authors: Asheim, K., Holsen, I. F., Renmann, V., Blanco, M. V., Vullum, P. E., Wagner, N. P., Mæhlen, J.P., Svensson, A. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Batteries & supercaps
container_volume 7
creator Asheim, K.
Holsen, I. F.
Renmann, V.
Blanco, M. V.
Vullum, P. E.
Wagner, N. P.
Mæhlen, J.P.
Svensson, A. M.
description Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) is a promising alternative salt for Li‐ion batteries. Unlike the conventional LiPF6, it is not prone to HF formation, and thus resistant to moisture. However, for cell voltages relevant for high energy cathodes (>4.2 V), the aluminium current collector will corrode in electrolytes based on this salt, and mitigation strategies are needed. Here, the use of Lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4) and Lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) salts as additives is investigated, in order to enable the use of LiFSI‐based electrolytes. The performance of the electrolytes is evaluated separately for high content silicon anodes, (NMC442) cathodes and the aluminium current collector by electrochemical methods and post mortem analysis by SEM imaging and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Electrolytes with LiDFOB as additive showed the best performance for all components, and were therefore selected for cycling in full cells, composed of silicon anodes and NMC442. Results show that LiFSI‐based electrolytes with LiDFOB additive has an electrochemical performance similar to conventional electrolytes, and is thus a competitive, alternative electrolyte with a low fluorine content. Furthermore, it is verified that the good SEI forming properties of LiFSI based electrolytes known from cycling in half cells, is also preserved during cycling in full cells Addition of LiDFOB to an LiFSI based electrolyte enables cycling of full cells with the cathode at voltages up to 4.5 V, without corrosion of the aluminum current collector. The LiDFOB additive aids the formation of a passivating SEI at the surface of the silicon anode. HF‐forming additives, like LiBF4, appear to ruin the excellent SEI forming properties of the LiFSI based electrolytes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/batt.202300541
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_batt_202300541_BATT202300541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>BATT202300541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-s2051-d69a0f7e0d5d8c42025ab724613bc89d8407819fe02419e8ba956b17970d37fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQjBBIVKVXzj62hwbbeR9LVR5SoZdyjux4Qxa5MYodUG58Al_DB_EluBRVXHZ2R7Oj3QmCS0ZDRim_ksK5kFMeUZrE7CQY8SRN5ynn0em__jyYWPtC_QKLaRZFo-Br1QqpsX0mrgHSWyCmJhpdg_2OSLRT12Gte9OZHbhGtGB7XZt20DPcoQIiLAENleuMHhwQK7QjtenIGr8_PtG0ZH8YdAjWdxYU8ZRFjZVH0RrledEqL58-Ig3jpfHloaUhn204qYRrfiVyODgLpdDhG9iL4KwW2sLkD8fB081qu7ybrze398vFem45TdhcpYWgdQZUJSqvYp9PImTG45RFssoLlfsUclbUQHnMCsilKJJUsqzIqIqyWkbjoDj4vqOGoXztcCe6oWS03Kde7p8rj6mX14vt9jhFP1EFe3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enabling the use of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as electrolyte salt for Li‐ion batteries based on silicon anodes and Li(Ni0.4Co0.4Mn0.2)O2 cathodes by salt additives</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Asheim, K. ; Holsen, I. F. ; Renmann, V. ; Blanco, M. V. ; Vullum, P. E. ; Wagner, N. P. ; Mæhlen, J.P. ; Svensson, A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Asheim, K. ; Holsen, I. F. ; Renmann, V. ; Blanco, M. V. ; Vullum, P. E. ; Wagner, N. P. ; Mæhlen, J.P. ; Svensson, A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) is a promising alternative salt for Li‐ion batteries. Unlike the conventional LiPF6, it is not prone to HF formation, and thus resistant to moisture. However, for cell voltages relevant for high energy cathodes (&gt;4.2 V), the aluminium current collector will corrode in electrolytes based on this salt, and mitigation strategies are needed. Here, the use of Lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4) and Lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) salts as additives is investigated, in order to enable the use of LiFSI‐based electrolytes. The performance of the electrolytes is evaluated separately for high content silicon anodes, (NMC442) cathodes and the aluminium current collector by electrochemical methods and post mortem analysis by SEM imaging and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Electrolytes with LiDFOB as additive showed the best performance for all components, and were therefore selected for cycling in full cells, composed of silicon anodes and NMC442. Results show that LiFSI‐based electrolytes with LiDFOB additive has an electrochemical performance similar to conventional electrolytes, and is thus a competitive, alternative electrolyte with a low fluorine content. Furthermore, it is verified that the good SEI forming properties of LiFSI based electrolytes known from cycling in half cells, is also preserved during cycling in full cells Addition of LiDFOB to an LiFSI based electrolyte enables cycling of full cells with the cathode at voltages up to 4.5 V, without corrosion of the aluminum current collector. The LiDFOB additive aids the formation of a passivating SEI at the surface of the silicon anode. HF‐forming additives, like LiBF4, appear to ruin the excellent SEI forming properties of the LiFSI based electrolytes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2566-6223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2566-6223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/batt.202300541</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Li-ion ; LiDFOB ; LiFSI ; Silicon</subject><ispartof>Batteries &amp; supercaps, 2024-06, Vol.7 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Batteries &amp; Supercaps published by Wiley-VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-7572-2401</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asheim, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsen, I. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renmann, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vullum, P. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mæhlen, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Enabling the use of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as electrolyte salt for Li‐ion batteries based on silicon anodes and Li(Ni0.4Co0.4Mn0.2)O2 cathodes by salt additives</title><title>Batteries &amp; supercaps</title><description>Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) is a promising alternative salt for Li‐ion batteries. Unlike the conventional LiPF6, it is not prone to HF formation, and thus resistant to moisture. However, for cell voltages relevant for high energy cathodes (&gt;4.2 V), the aluminium current collector will corrode in electrolytes based on this salt, and mitigation strategies are needed. Here, the use of Lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4) and Lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) salts as additives is investigated, in order to enable the use of LiFSI‐based electrolytes. The performance of the electrolytes is evaluated separately for high content silicon anodes, (NMC442) cathodes and the aluminium current collector by electrochemical methods and post mortem analysis by SEM imaging and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Electrolytes with LiDFOB as additive showed the best performance for all components, and were therefore selected for cycling in full cells, composed of silicon anodes and NMC442. Results show that LiFSI‐based electrolytes with LiDFOB additive has an electrochemical performance similar to conventional electrolytes, and is thus a competitive, alternative electrolyte with a low fluorine content. Furthermore, it is verified that the good SEI forming properties of LiFSI based electrolytes known from cycling in half cells, is also preserved during cycling in full cells Addition of LiDFOB to an LiFSI based electrolyte enables cycling of full cells with the cathode at voltages up to 4.5 V, without corrosion of the aluminum current collector. The LiDFOB additive aids the formation of a passivating SEI at the surface of the silicon anode. HF‐forming additives, like LiBF4, appear to ruin the excellent SEI forming properties of the LiFSI based electrolytes.</description><subject>Li-ion</subject><subject>LiDFOB</subject><subject>LiFSI</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><issn>2566-6223</issn><issn>2566-6223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQjBBIVKVXzj62hwbbeR9LVR5SoZdyjux4Qxa5MYodUG58Al_DB_EluBRVXHZ2R7Oj3QmCS0ZDRim_ksK5kFMeUZrE7CQY8SRN5ynn0em__jyYWPtC_QKLaRZFo-Br1QqpsX0mrgHSWyCmJhpdg_2OSLRT12Gte9OZHbhGtGB7XZt20DPcoQIiLAENleuMHhwQK7QjtenIGr8_PtG0ZH8YdAjWdxYU8ZRFjZVH0RrledEqL58-Ig3jpfHloaUhn204qYRrfiVyODgLpdDhG9iL4KwW2sLkD8fB081qu7ybrze398vFem45TdhcpYWgdQZUJSqvYp9PImTG45RFssoLlfsUclbUQHnMCsilKJJUsqzIqIqyWkbjoDj4vqOGoXztcCe6oWS03Kde7p8rj6mX14vt9jhFP1EFe3k</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Asheim, K.</creator><creator>Holsen, I. F.</creator><creator>Renmann, V.</creator><creator>Blanco, M. V.</creator><creator>Vullum, P. E.</creator><creator>Wagner, N. P.</creator><creator>Mæhlen, J.P.</creator><creator>Svensson, A. M.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7572-2401</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Enabling the use of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as electrolyte salt for Li‐ion batteries based on silicon anodes and Li(Ni0.4Co0.4Mn0.2)O2 cathodes by salt additives</title><author>Asheim, K. ; Holsen, I. F. ; Renmann, V. ; Blanco, M. V. ; Vullum, P. E. ; Wagner, N. P. ; Mæhlen, J.P. ; Svensson, A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s2051-d69a0f7e0d5d8c42025ab724613bc89d8407819fe02419e8ba956b17970d37fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Li-ion</topic><topic>LiDFOB</topic><topic>LiFSI</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asheim, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsen, I. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renmann, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vullum, P. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mæhlen, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Batteries &amp; supercaps</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asheim, K.</au><au>Holsen, I. F.</au><au>Renmann, V.</au><au>Blanco, M. V.</au><au>Vullum, P. E.</au><au>Wagner, N. P.</au><au>Mæhlen, J.P.</au><au>Svensson, A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enabling the use of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as electrolyte salt for Li‐ion batteries based on silicon anodes and Li(Ni0.4Co0.4Mn0.2)O2 cathodes by salt additives</atitle><jtitle>Batteries &amp; supercaps</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2566-6223</issn><eissn>2566-6223</eissn><abstract>Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) is a promising alternative salt for Li‐ion batteries. Unlike the conventional LiPF6, it is not prone to HF formation, and thus resistant to moisture. However, for cell voltages relevant for high energy cathodes (&gt;4.2 V), the aluminium current collector will corrode in electrolytes based on this salt, and mitigation strategies are needed. Here, the use of Lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4) and Lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) salts as additives is investigated, in order to enable the use of LiFSI‐based electrolytes. The performance of the electrolytes is evaluated separately for high content silicon anodes, (NMC442) cathodes and the aluminium current collector by electrochemical methods and post mortem analysis by SEM imaging and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Electrolytes with LiDFOB as additive showed the best performance for all components, and were therefore selected for cycling in full cells, composed of silicon anodes and NMC442. Results show that LiFSI‐based electrolytes with LiDFOB additive has an electrochemical performance similar to conventional electrolytes, and is thus a competitive, alternative electrolyte with a low fluorine content. Furthermore, it is verified that the good SEI forming properties of LiFSI based electrolytes known from cycling in half cells, is also preserved during cycling in full cells Addition of LiDFOB to an LiFSI based electrolyte enables cycling of full cells with the cathode at voltages up to 4.5 V, without corrosion of the aluminum current collector. The LiDFOB additive aids the formation of a passivating SEI at the surface of the silicon anode. HF‐forming additives, like LiBF4, appear to ruin the excellent SEI forming properties of the LiFSI based electrolytes.</abstract><doi>10.1002/batt.202300541</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7572-2401</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2566-6223
ispartof Batteries & supercaps, 2024-06, Vol.7 (6), p.n/a
issn 2566-6223
2566-6223
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_batt_202300541_BATT202300541
source Wiley
subjects Li-ion
LiDFOB
LiFSI
Silicon
title Enabling the use of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as electrolyte salt for Li‐ion batteries based on silicon anodes and Li(Ni0.4Co0.4Mn0.2)O2 cathodes by salt additives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enabling%20the%20use%20of%20lithium%20bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide%20as%20electrolyte%20salt%20for%20Li%E2%80%90ion%20batteries%20based%20on%20silicon%20anodes%20and%20Li(Ni0.4Co0.4Mn0.2)O2%20cathodes%20by%20salt%20additives&rft.jtitle=Batteries%20&%20supercaps&rft.au=Asheim,%20K.&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2566-6223&rft.eissn=2566-6223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/batt.202300541&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3EBATT202300541%3C/wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s2051-d69a0f7e0d5d8c42025ab724613bc89d8407819fe02419e8ba956b17970d37fb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true