Loading…
Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?
BACKGROUND: Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early pat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer 2009-05, Vol.115 (9), p.2013-2021 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 2021 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2013 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Fadul, Nada Elsayem, Ahmed Palmer, J. Lynn Del Fabbro, Egidio Swint, Kay Li, Zhijun Poulter, Valerie Bruera, Eduardo |
description | BACKGROUND:
Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center.
METHODS:
A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral.
RESULTS:
A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99).
CONCLUSIONS:
The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer trea |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.24206 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_24206_CNCR24206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR24206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLw0AUhQdRMFY3_oLZuUq988hMxo1IsCoUBR_obriZ3mAkjWGmrfTf20ZX57E4nI-xcwFTASAvQx_iVGoJ5oBlApzNQWh5yDIAKPNCq49jdpLS1y5aWaiM6Zf1MHzHVbshvqGY1okP2HUtjk3ASFf8_RNXF4m3PUfe45KuT9lRg12is3-dsLfZ7Wt1n8-f7h6qm3kelAaTN1QKqoEaW9imrNEFclYvFlJrQm3q3T9ZOkOFCYWzFGyNppbkXAhONVarCRN_uz9tR1s_xHaJcesF-D2s38P6EdZXj9Xz6NQvIrlJwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Fadul, Nada ; Elsayem, Ahmed ; Palmer, J. Lynn ; Del Fabbro, Egidio ; Swint, Kay ; Li, Zhijun ; Poulter, Valerie ; Bruera, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Fadul, Nada ; Elsayem, Ahmed ; Palmer, J. Lynn ; Del Fabbro, Egidio ; Swint, Kay ; Li, Zhijun ; Poulter, Valerie ; Bruera, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND:
Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center.
METHODS:
A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral.
RESULTS:
A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99).
CONCLUSIONS:
The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer treatments to a service named supportive care. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
This study determined the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral as indicated by referrals at specific times in the cancer illness trajectory.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>advanced cancer ; palliative care ; patient referral ; supportive care</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2009-05, Vol.115 (9), p.2013-2021</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fadul, Nada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsayem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, J. Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Fabbro, Egidio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swint, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulter, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruera, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</title><title>Cancer</title><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND:
Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center.
METHODS:
A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral.
RESULTS:
A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99).
CONCLUSIONS:
The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer treatments to a service named supportive care. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
This study determined the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral as indicated by referrals at specific times in the cancer illness trajectory.]]></description><subject>advanced cancer</subject><subject>palliative care</subject><subject>patient referral</subject><subject>supportive care</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotj0tLw0AUhQdRMFY3_oLZuUq988hMxo1IsCoUBR_obriZ3mAkjWGmrfTf20ZX57E4nI-xcwFTASAvQx_iVGoJ5oBlApzNQWh5yDIAKPNCq49jdpLS1y5aWaiM6Zf1MHzHVbshvqGY1okP2HUtjk3ASFf8_RNXF4m3PUfe45KuT9lRg12is3-dsLfZ7Wt1n8-f7h6qm3kelAaTN1QKqoEaW9imrNEFclYvFlJrQm3q3T9ZOkOFCYWzFGyNppbkXAhONVarCRN_uz9tR1s_xHaJcesF-D2s38P6EdZXj9Xz6NQvIrlJwQ</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Fadul, Nada</creator><creator>Elsayem, Ahmed</creator><creator>Palmer, J. Lynn</creator><creator>Del Fabbro, Egidio</creator><creator>Swint, Kay</creator><creator>Li, Zhijun</creator><creator>Poulter, Valerie</creator><creator>Bruera, Eduardo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</title><author>Fadul, Nada ; Elsayem, Ahmed ; Palmer, J. Lynn ; Del Fabbro, Egidio ; Swint, Kay ; Li, Zhijun ; Poulter, Valerie ; Bruera, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>advanced cancer</topic><topic>palliative care</topic><topic>patient referral</topic><topic>supportive care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fadul, Nada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsayem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, J. Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Fabbro, Egidio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swint, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulter, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruera, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fadul, Nada</au><au>Elsayem, Ahmed</au><au>Palmer, J. Lynn</au><au>Del Fabbro, Egidio</au><au>Swint, Kay</au><au>Li, Zhijun</au><au>Poulter, Valerie</au><au>Bruera, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2013</spage><epage>2021</epage><pages>2013-2021</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[BACKGROUND:
Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center.
METHODS:
A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral.
RESULTS:
A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99).
CONCLUSIONS:
The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer treatments to a service named supportive care. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
This study determined the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral as indicated by referrals at specific times in the cancer illness trajectory.]]></abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/cncr.24206</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2009-05, Vol.115 (9), p.2013-2021 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_24206_CNCR24206 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | advanced cancer palliative care patient referral supportive care |
title | Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supportive%20versus%20palliative%20care:%20What's%20in%20a%20name?&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Fadul,%20Nada&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2013&rft.epage=2021&rft.pages=2013-2021&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.24206&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3ECNCR24206%3C/wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |