Loading…

Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?

BACKGROUND: Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 2009-05, Vol.115 (9), p.2013-2021
Main Authors: Fadul, Nada, Elsayem, Ahmed, Palmer, J. Lynn, Del Fabbro, Egidio, Swint, Kay, Li, Zhijun, Poulter, Valerie, Bruera, Eduardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743
cites
container_end_page 2021
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2013
container_title Cancer
container_volume 115
creator Fadul, Nada
Elsayem, Ahmed
Palmer, J. Lynn
Del Fabbro, Egidio
Swint, Kay
Li, Zhijun
Poulter, Valerie
Bruera, Eduardo
description BACKGROUND: Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral. RESULTS: A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer trea
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.24206
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_24206_CNCR24206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR24206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLw0AUhQdRMFY3_oLZuUq988hMxo1IsCoUBR_obriZ3mAkjWGmrfTf20ZX57E4nI-xcwFTASAvQx_iVGoJ5oBlApzNQWh5yDIAKPNCq49jdpLS1y5aWaiM6Zf1MHzHVbshvqGY1okP2HUtjk3ASFf8_RNXF4m3PUfe45KuT9lRg12is3-dsLfZ7Wt1n8-f7h6qm3kelAaTN1QKqoEaW9imrNEFclYvFlJrQm3q3T9ZOkOFCYWzFGyNppbkXAhONVarCRN_uz9tR1s_xHaJcesF-D2s38P6EdZXj9Xz6NQvIrlJwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Fadul, Nada ; Elsayem, Ahmed ; Palmer, J. Lynn ; Del Fabbro, Egidio ; Swint, Kay ; Li, Zhijun ; Poulter, Valerie ; Bruera, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Fadul, Nada ; Elsayem, Ahmed ; Palmer, J. Lynn ; Del Fabbro, Egidio ; Swint, Kay ; Li, Zhijun ; Poulter, Valerie ; Bruera, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND: Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral. RESULTS: A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer treatments to a service named supportive care. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. This study determined the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral as indicated by referrals at specific times in the cancer illness trajectory.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>advanced cancer ; palliative care ; patient referral ; supportive care</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2009-05, Vol.115 (9), p.2013-2021</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fadul, Nada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsayem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, J. Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Fabbro, Egidio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swint, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulter, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruera, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</title><title>Cancer</title><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND: Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral. RESULTS: A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer treatments to a service named supportive care. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. This study determined the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral as indicated by referrals at specific times in the cancer illness trajectory.]]></description><subject>advanced cancer</subject><subject>palliative care</subject><subject>patient referral</subject><subject>supportive care</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotj0tLw0AUhQdRMFY3_oLZuUq988hMxo1IsCoUBR_obriZ3mAkjWGmrfTf20ZX57E4nI-xcwFTASAvQx_iVGoJ5oBlApzNQWh5yDIAKPNCq49jdpLS1y5aWaiM6Zf1MHzHVbshvqGY1okP2HUtjk3ASFf8_RNXF4m3PUfe45KuT9lRg12is3-dsLfZ7Wt1n8-f7h6qm3kelAaTN1QKqoEaW9imrNEFclYvFlJrQm3q3T9ZOkOFCYWzFGyNppbkXAhONVarCRN_uz9tR1s_xHaJcesF-D2s38P6EdZXj9Xz6NQvIrlJwQ</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Fadul, Nada</creator><creator>Elsayem, Ahmed</creator><creator>Palmer, J. Lynn</creator><creator>Del Fabbro, Egidio</creator><creator>Swint, Kay</creator><creator>Li, Zhijun</creator><creator>Poulter, Valerie</creator><creator>Bruera, Eduardo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</title><author>Fadul, Nada ; Elsayem, Ahmed ; Palmer, J. Lynn ; Del Fabbro, Egidio ; Swint, Kay ; Li, Zhijun ; Poulter, Valerie ; Bruera, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>advanced cancer</topic><topic>palliative care</topic><topic>patient referral</topic><topic>supportive care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fadul, Nada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsayem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, J. Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Fabbro, Egidio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swint, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulter, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruera, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fadul, Nada</au><au>Elsayem, Ahmed</au><au>Palmer, J. Lynn</au><au>Del Fabbro, Egidio</au><au>Swint, Kay</au><au>Li, Zhijun</au><au>Poulter, Valerie</au><au>Bruera, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2013</spage><epage>2021</epage><pages>2013-2021</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[BACKGROUND: Palliative care has been progressively adopted by American cancer centers; however, referrals to palliative care continue to occur late in the trajectory of illness. It was hypothesized that the perceived association between the name palliative care and hospice was a barrier to early patients' referral. The objectives of this study were to determine the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral and to determine whether there was an association between demographic factors and the perceptions of the 2 names by medical oncologists and their midlevel providers (advance practice nurses and physician assistants) at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A survey was conducted among a random sample of 100 medical oncologists and 100 midlevel providers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Information was collected on demographics, previous experience in palliative care, and attitudes and beliefs toward the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral. RESULTS: A total of 140 of 200 (70%) participants responded (74 midlevel providers and 66 medical oncologists). Median age was 43 years (range, 34.5‐50 years), and there were 83 (60%) women. Midlevel providers and medical oncologists generally agreed in their responses to most of the items. More participants preferred the name supportive care (80, 57%) compared with palliative care (27, 19% P < .0001). Medical oncologists and midlevel providers stated increased likelihood to refer patients on active primary (79 vs 45%, P < .0001) and advanced cancer (89 vs 69%, P < .0001) treatments to a service named supportive care. The name palliative care compared with supportive care was perceived more frequently by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as a barrier to referral (23 vs 6% P < .0001), decreasing hope (44 vs 11% P < .0001), and causing distress (33 vs 3% P < .0001) in patients and families. There were no significant associations among the perception of the 2 names and age (P = .82), sex (P = .35), or prior training in palliative care (P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: The name palliative care was perceived by medical oncologists and midlevel providers as more distressing and reducing hope to patients and families. Medical oncologists and midlevel providers significantly prefer the name supportive care and stated more likelihood to refer patients on active primary and advanced cancer treatments to a service named supportive care. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. This study determined the perception of the impact of the name palliative care compared with supportive care on patient referral as indicated by referrals at specific times in the cancer illness trajectory.]]></abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/cncr.24206</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2009-05, Vol.115 (9), p.2013-2021
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_24206_CNCR24206
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects advanced cancer
palliative care
patient referral
supportive care
title Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supportive%20versus%20palliative%20care:%20What's%20in%20a%20name?&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Fadul,%20Nada&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2013&rft.epage=2021&rft.pages=2013-2021&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.24206&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3ECNCR24206%3C/wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3406-fe81eb0ef757f8ba9ce974dd244ea46b1092896e56c597ec7ba6b2e99cc93f743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true