Loading…

Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches

The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of sport science 2017-05, Vol.17 (4), p.407-416
Main Authors: Maxwell, Jon P., Capio, Catherine M., Masters, Rich S.W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833
container_end_page 416
container_issue 4
container_start_page 407
container_title European journal of sport science
container_volume 17
creator Maxwell, Jon P.
Capio, Catherine M.
Masters, Rich S.W.
description The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1080_17461391_2016_1268211_EJSCBF01023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1901747815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCCAv2WTqnzhxWCDaUUuLKrGge8uxr6nBsVM7o2HeHqczwxJY2df6zrnWOVX1luAVwQKfk65pCevJimLSrghtBSXkWXVKOGvrjvb4ebkXpl6gk-pVzj8wLg9UvKxOqMBMcExPq8fbMENSenYxoAHmLUBAY5xjQmpw3s07pIJB-afzHnlQKbjwHbmA9IPzJkH4gC6myTutnhyiRW5cRjc_6eDXcZimFJV-gPy6emGVz_DmcJ5V99dX9-ub-u7r59v1xV2tG96w2ghlGsaUBdKZvula22HSd0pAYxgdVNNy0HywuDGDbnrV25bqjnFLDAyCsbPq_d627H3cQJ7l6LIG71WAuMmS9EsanSh5_RMVvGTNSS8KyveoTjHnBFZOyY0q7STBculFHnuRSy_y0EvRvTus2AwjmD-qYxEF-LgHts7D7v9c5dWXb-vLa0yKvhh82hu4YGMa1TYmb-Ssdj4mm1TQLkv290_-BnVKr2M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854615198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Maxwell, Jon P. ; Capio, Catherine M. ; Masters, Rich S.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Jon P. ; Capio, Catherine M. ; Masters, Rich S.W.</creatorcontrib><description>The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-1391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-7290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28038502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology ; Child ; children ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; errorless learning ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Golf - physiology ; Humans ; Implicit motor learning ; Learning - physiology ; Male ; Memory - physiology ; motor ability ; Motor Skills - physiology ; working memory</subject><ispartof>European journal of sport science, 2017-05, Vol.17 (4), p.407-416</ispartof><rights>2016 European College of Sport Science 2016</rights><rights>European College of Sport Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Jon P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capio, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, Rich S.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</title><title>European journal of sport science</title><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><description>The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities.</description><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>errorless learning</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Golf - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit motor learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>motor ability</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>working memory</subject><issn>1746-1391</issn><issn>1536-7290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCCAv2WTqnzhxWCDaUUuLKrGge8uxr6nBsVM7o2HeHqczwxJY2df6zrnWOVX1luAVwQKfk65pCevJimLSrghtBSXkWXVKOGvrjvb4ebkXpl6gk-pVzj8wLg9UvKxOqMBMcExPq8fbMENSenYxoAHmLUBAY5xjQmpw3s07pIJB-afzHnlQKbjwHbmA9IPzJkH4gC6myTutnhyiRW5cRjc_6eDXcZimFJV-gPy6emGVz_DmcJ5V99dX9-ub-u7r59v1xV2tG96w2ghlGsaUBdKZvula22HSd0pAYxgdVNNy0HywuDGDbnrV25bqjnFLDAyCsbPq_d627H3cQJ7l6LIG71WAuMmS9EsanSh5_RMVvGTNSS8KyveoTjHnBFZOyY0q7STBculFHnuRSy_y0EvRvTus2AwjmD-qYxEF-LgHts7D7v9c5dWXb-vLa0yKvhh82hu4YGMa1TYmb-Ssdj4mm1TQLkv290_-BnVKr2M</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Maxwell, Jon P.</creator><creator>Capio, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Masters, Rich S.W.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</title><author>Maxwell, Jon P. ; Capio, Catherine M. ; Masters, Rich S.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>errorless learning</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Golf - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit motor learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>motor ability</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Jon P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capio, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, Rich S.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maxwell, Jon P.</au><au>Capio, Catherine M.</au><au>Masters, Rich S.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</atitle><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>407-416</pages><issn>1746-1391</issn><eissn>1536-7290</eissn><abstract>The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>28038502</pmid><doi>10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1746-1391
ispartof European journal of sport science, 2017-05, Vol.17 (4), p.407-416
issn 1746-1391
1536-7290
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1080_17461391_2016_1268211_EJSCBF01023
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Athletic Performance - physiology
Child
children
Cross-Sectional Studies
errorless learning
Exercise Test
Female
Golf - physiology
Humans
Implicit motor learning
Learning - physiology
Male
Memory - physiology
motor ability
Motor Skills - physiology
working memory
title Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20between%20motor%20ability%20and%20skill%20learning%20in%20children:%20Application%20of%20implicit%20and%20explicit%20approaches&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20sport%20science&rft.au=Maxwell,%20Jon%20P.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=407-416&rft.issn=1746-1391&rft.eissn=1536-7290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1901747815%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854615198&rft_id=info:pmid/28038502&rfr_iscdi=true