Loading…
Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches
The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of sport science 2017-05, Vol.17 (4), p.407-416 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833 |
container_end_page | 416 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 407 |
container_title | European journal of sport science |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Maxwell, Jon P. Capio, Catherine M. Masters, Rich S.W. |
description | The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1080_17461391_2016_1268211_EJSCBF01023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1901747815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCCAv2WTqnzhxWCDaUUuLKrGge8uxr6nBsVM7o2HeHqczwxJY2df6zrnWOVX1luAVwQKfk65pCevJimLSrghtBSXkWXVKOGvrjvb4ebkXpl6gk-pVzj8wLg9UvKxOqMBMcExPq8fbMENSenYxoAHmLUBAY5xjQmpw3s07pIJB-afzHnlQKbjwHbmA9IPzJkH4gC6myTutnhyiRW5cRjc_6eDXcZimFJV-gPy6emGVz_DmcJ5V99dX9-ub-u7r59v1xV2tG96w2ghlGsaUBdKZvula22HSd0pAYxgdVNNy0HywuDGDbnrV25bqjnFLDAyCsbPq_d627H3cQJ7l6LIG71WAuMmS9EsanSh5_RMVvGTNSS8KyveoTjHnBFZOyY0q7STBculFHnuRSy_y0EvRvTus2AwjmD-qYxEF-LgHts7D7v9c5dWXb-vLa0yKvhh82hu4YGMa1TYmb-Ssdj4mm1TQLkv290_-BnVKr2M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854615198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Maxwell, Jon P. ; Capio, Catherine M. ; Masters, Rich S.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Jon P. ; Capio, Catherine M. ; Masters, Rich S.W.</creatorcontrib><description>The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-1391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-7290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28038502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology ; Child ; children ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; errorless learning ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Golf - physiology ; Humans ; Implicit motor learning ; Learning - physiology ; Male ; Memory - physiology ; motor ability ; Motor Skills - physiology ; working memory</subject><ispartof>European journal of sport science, 2017-05, Vol.17 (4), p.407-416</ispartof><rights>2016 European College of Sport Science 2016</rights><rights>European College of Sport Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Jon P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capio, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, Rich S.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</title><title>European journal of sport science</title><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><description>The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities.</description><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>errorless learning</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Golf - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit motor learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>motor ability</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>working memory</subject><issn>1746-1391</issn><issn>1536-7290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCCAv2WTqnzhxWCDaUUuLKrGge8uxr6nBsVM7o2HeHqczwxJY2df6zrnWOVX1luAVwQKfk65pCevJimLSrghtBSXkWXVKOGvrjvb4ebkXpl6gk-pVzj8wLg9UvKxOqMBMcExPq8fbMENSenYxoAHmLUBAY5xjQmpw3s07pIJB-afzHnlQKbjwHbmA9IPzJkH4gC6myTutnhyiRW5cRjc_6eDXcZimFJV-gPy6emGVz_DmcJ5V99dX9-ub-u7r59v1xV2tG96w2ghlGsaUBdKZvula22HSd0pAYxgdVNNy0HywuDGDbnrV25bqjnFLDAyCsbPq_d627H3cQJ7l6LIG71WAuMmS9EsanSh5_RMVvGTNSS8KyveoTjHnBFZOyY0q7STBculFHnuRSy_y0EvRvTus2AwjmD-qYxEF-LgHts7D7v9c5dWXb-vLa0yKvhh82hu4YGMa1TYmb-Ssdj4mm1TQLkv290_-BnVKr2M</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Maxwell, Jon P.</creator><creator>Capio, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Masters, Rich S.W.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</title><author>Maxwell, Jon P. ; Capio, Catherine M. ; Masters, Rich S.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>errorless learning</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Golf - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit motor learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>motor ability</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Jon P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capio, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, Rich S.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maxwell, Jon P.</au><au>Capio, Catherine M.</au><au>Masters, Rich S.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches</atitle><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>407-416</pages><issn>1746-1391</issn><eissn>1536-7290</eissn><abstract>The benefits of implicit and explicit motor learning approaches in young adults have been studied extensively, but much less in children. This study investigated the relationship between fundamental motor ability and implicit/explicit learning in children using the errorless learning paradigm. First, the motor ability of 261 children (142 boys, 119 girls) aged 9-12 years (M = 9.74, SD = 0.67) was measured. Second, children with motor ability scores in the upper and lower quartile learned a golf-putting skill in either an errorless (implicit) or errorful (explicit) learning condition. Four groups were formed: Errorless High-Ability (n = 13), Errorless Low-Ability (n = 11), Errorful High-Ability (n = 10), and Errorful Low-Ability (n = 11). Learning consisted of 300 practice trials, while testing included a 50-trial retention test, followed by a 50-trial secondary task transfer test, and another 50-trial retention test. The results showed that for high- and low-ability errorless learners, motor performance was unaffected by the secondary task, as was the case for high-ability errorful learners. Low-ability errorful learners performed worse with a secondary task and were significantly poorer than the corresponding high-ability group. These results suggest that implicit motor learning (errorless) may be beneficial for children with low motor ability. The findings also show a trend that children of high motor ability might benefit from learning explicitly (errorful). Further research is recommended to examine the compatibility of implicit and explicit approaches for children of different abilities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>28038502</pmid><doi>10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-1391 |
ispartof | European journal of sport science, 2017-05, Vol.17 (4), p.407-416 |
issn | 1746-1391 1536-7290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1080_17461391_2016_1268211_EJSCBF01023 |
source | EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text |
subjects | Athletic Performance - physiology Child children Cross-Sectional Studies errorless learning Exercise Test Female Golf - physiology Humans Implicit motor learning Learning - physiology Male Memory - physiology motor ability Motor Skills - physiology working memory |
title | Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20between%20motor%20ability%20and%20skill%20learning%20in%20children:%20Application%20of%20implicit%20and%20explicit%20approaches&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20sport%20science&rft.au=Maxwell,%20Jon%20P.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=407-416&rft.issn=1746-1391&rft.eissn=1536-7290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17461391.2016.1268211&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1901747815%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-d8ad433afe17d9476f70197a8e4d32ba465ec5bf04dbc49a9f62c735f1deb833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854615198&rft_id=info:pmid/28038502&rfr_iscdi=true |