The Constitutional Imagination

The constitutional imagination refers to the way we have been able to conceive the relationship between thought, text and action in the constitution of modern political authority. The lecture seeks to demonstrate how modern constitutional texts come to be invested with a 'world-making' cap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Modern law review 2015-01, Vol.78 (1), p.1-25
Main Author: Loughlin, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ambiguity
Constitution
Constitutional law
Constitutions
Dialectics
Influence
Modernity and society
Political authority
Political ideology
Politics and government
Social contract
U.S. states
World politics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5314-ddbec87785878ead82edc1fd30f26a0d30e00c5b25136f51b0e1afc71b6fccf23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5314-ddbec87785878ead82edc1fd30f26a0d30e00c5b25136f51b0e1afc71b6fccf23
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Modern law review
container_volume 78
creator Loughlin, Martin
description The constitutional imagination refers to the way we have been able to conceive the relationship between thought, text and action in the constitution of modern political authority. The lecture seeks to demonstrate how modern constitutional texts come to be invested with a 'world-making' capacity. The argument is advanced first by explaining how social contract thinkers have been able to set the parameters of the constitutional imagination (thought), then by showing that constitutions are agonistic documents and their interpretative method is determined by a dialectic of ideology and utopia (text), and finally by examining the degree to which constitutions have been able to colonise the political domain, thereby converting constitutional aspiration into political reality (action). It concludes by suggesting that although we seem to be entering a constitutional age, this is an ambiguous achievement and whether the power of the constitutional imagination can still be sustained remains an open question.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1468-2230.12104
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_1468_2230_12104_MLR12104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20200713033195</informt_id><jstor_id>43829097</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43829097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5314-ddbec87785878ead82edc1fd30f26a0d30e00c5b25136f51b0e1afc71b6fccf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1P3DAQxa2qSN3SnntqhcSFS2Bsx3ZyhBVf0vJVUfU48jo2eJuNFzurlv8eZ1P2wIW5jGbm955Gj5BvFA5priNayqpgjOeRUSg_kMl285FMAJgsVC3pJ_I5pQUACCbUhPy4f7R709Cl3vfr3odOt3uXS_3gOz1MX8iO022yX__3XfLr7PR-elHMbs4vp8ezwghOy6Jp5tZUSlWiUpXVTcVsY6hrODgmNeRuAYyYM0G5dILOwVLtjKJz6YxxjO-Sg9F3FcPT2qYelz4Z27a6s2GdkMpSylpyWWd0_w26COuY_95QlNcgOGTqaKRMDClF63AV_VLHZ6SAQ144pINDOrjJKyvEqPjrW_v8Ho5Xs5-vuotRF5e-x5xcWvWYrI7mEX3nwmYd4gM2wQ9unFP5ijFgAIrmfzmtRbb6PlotUh_i9oWSV6yGWuV7Md596u2_7V3HPygVVwJ_X58jnNxW0zt1hWf8Bdfdm6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1641390530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Constitutional Imagination</title><source>Lexis+ UK</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Loughlin, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Loughlin, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The constitutional imagination refers to the way we have been able to conceive the relationship between thought, text and action in the constitution of modern political authority. The lecture seeks to demonstrate how modern constitutional texts come to be invested with a 'world-making' capacity. The argument is advanced first by explaining how social contract thinkers have been able to set the parameters of the constitutional imagination (thought), then by showing that constitutions are agonistic documents and their interpretative method is determined by a dialectic of ideology and utopia (text), and finally by examining the degree to which constitutions have been able to colonise the political domain, thereby converting constitutional aspiration into political reality (action). It concludes by suggesting that although we seem to be entering a constitutional age, this is an ambiguous achievement and whether the power of the constitutional imagination can still be sustained remains an open question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-7961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Constitution ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; Dialectics ; Influence ; Modernity and society ; Political authority ; Political ideology ; Politics and government ; Social contract ; U.S. states ; World politics</subject><ispartof>Modern law review, 2015-01, Vol.78 (1), p.1-25</ispartof><rights>copyright © 2015 The Modern Law Review Limited</rights><rights>2015 The Author. The Modern Law Review © 2015 The Modern Law Review Limited</rights><rights>2015 The Modern Law Review Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5314-ddbec87785878ead82edc1fd30f26a0d30e00c5b25136f51b0e1afc71b6fccf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5314-ddbec87785878ead82edc1fd30f26a0d30e00c5b25136f51b0e1afc71b6fccf23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43829097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43829097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loughlin, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>The Constitutional Imagination</title><title>Modern law review</title><addtitle>Mod. L. Rev</addtitle><description>The constitutional imagination refers to the way we have been able to conceive the relationship between thought, text and action in the constitution of modern political authority. The lecture seeks to demonstrate how modern constitutional texts come to be invested with a 'world-making' capacity. The argument is advanced first by explaining how social contract thinkers have been able to set the parameters of the constitutional imagination (thought), then by showing that constitutions are agonistic documents and their interpretative method is determined by a dialectic of ideology and utopia (text), and finally by examining the degree to which constitutions have been able to colonise the political domain, thereby converting constitutional aspiration into political reality (action). It concludes by suggesting that although we seem to be entering a constitutional age, this is an ambiguous achievement and whether the power of the constitutional imagination can still be sustained remains an open question.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Constitution</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Dialectics</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Modernity and society</subject><subject>Political authority</subject><subject>Political ideology</subject><subject>Politics and government</subject><subject>Social contract</subject><subject>U.S. states</subject><subject>World politics</subject><issn>0026-7961</issn><issn>1468-2230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1P3DAQxa2qSN3SnntqhcSFS2Bsx3ZyhBVf0vJVUfU48jo2eJuNFzurlv8eZ1P2wIW5jGbm955Gj5BvFA5priNayqpgjOeRUSg_kMl285FMAJgsVC3pJ_I5pQUACCbUhPy4f7R709Cl3vfr3odOt3uXS_3gOz1MX8iO022yX__3XfLr7PR-elHMbs4vp8ezwghOy6Jp5tZUSlWiUpXVTcVsY6hrODgmNeRuAYyYM0G5dILOwVLtjKJz6YxxjO-Sg9F3FcPT2qYelz4Z27a6s2GdkMpSylpyWWd0_w26COuY_95QlNcgOGTqaKRMDClF63AV_VLHZ6SAQ144pINDOrjJKyvEqPjrW_v8Ho5Xs5-vuotRF5e-x5xcWvWYrI7mEX3nwmYd4gM2wQ9unFP5ijFgAIrmfzmtRbb6PlotUh_i9oWSV6yGWuV7Md596u2_7V3HPygVVwJ_X58jnNxW0zt1hWf8Bdfdm6Q</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Loughlin, Martin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>The Constitutional Imagination</title><author>Loughlin, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5314-ddbec87785878ead82edc1fd30f26a0d30e00c5b25136f51b0e1afc71b6fccf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Constitution</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Dialectics</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Modernity and society</topic><topic>Political authority</topic><topic>Political ideology</topic><topic>Politics and government</topic><topic>Social contract</topic><topic>U.S. states</topic><topic>World politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loughlin, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Modern law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loughlin, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Constitutional Imagination</atitle><jtitle>Modern law review</jtitle><addtitle>Mod. L. Rev</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>1-25</pages><issn>0026-7961</issn><eissn>1468-2230</eissn><abstract>The constitutional imagination refers to the way we have been able to conceive the relationship between thought, text and action in the constitution of modern political authority. The lecture seeks to demonstrate how modern constitutional texts come to be invested with a 'world-making' capacity. The argument is advanced first by explaining how social contract thinkers have been able to set the parameters of the constitutional imagination (thought), then by showing that constitutions are agonistic documents and their interpretative method is determined by a dialectic of ideology and utopia (text), and finally by examining the degree to which constitutions have been able to colonise the political domain, thereby converting constitutional aspiration into political reality (action). It concludes by suggesting that although we seem to be entering a constitutional age, this is an ambiguous achievement and whether the power of the constitutional imagination can still be sustained remains an open question.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1468-2230.12104</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-7961
ispartof Modern law review, 2015-01, Vol.78 (1), p.1-25
issn 0026-7961
1468-2230
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_1468_2230_12104_MLR12104
source Lexis+ UK; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Ambiguity
Constitution
Constitutional law
Constitutions
Dialectics
Influence
Modernity and society
Political authority
Political ideology
Politics and government
Social contract
U.S. states
World politics
title The Constitutional Imagination
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T23%3A18%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Constitutional%20Imagination&rft.jtitle=Modern%20law%20review&rft.au=Loughlin,%20Martin&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=1-25&rft.issn=0026-7961&rft.eissn=1468-2230&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1468-2230.12104&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_wiley%3E43829097%3C/jstor_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5314-ddbec87785878ead82edc1fd30f26a0d30e00c5b25136f51b0e1afc71b6fccf23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1641390530&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20200713033195&rft_jstor_id=43829097&rfr_iscdi=true