Loading…

A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup

External beam irradiation requires precise positioning of the target relative to the treatment planning coordinate system. A three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging system for patient positioning has recently been installed in one of our linear accelerator (linac) rooms. The device utilizes close-ran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2005-09, Vol.32 (9), p.2753-2762
Main Authors: Bert, Christoph, Metheany, Katherine G., Doppke, Karen, Chen, George T. Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5403-86265a49b86ff6fdcdfb02ec3cf6b03d068ef243494e456322b16d8d38d7b5643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5403-86265a49b86ff6fdcdfb02ec3cf6b03d068ef243494e456322b16d8d38d7b5643
container_end_page 2762
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2753
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 32
creator Bert, Christoph
Metheany, Katherine G.
Doppke, Karen
Chen, George T. Y.
description External beam irradiation requires precise positioning of the target relative to the treatment planning coordinate system. A three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging system for patient positioning has recently been installed in one of our linear accelerator (linac) rooms. The device utilizes close-range photogrammetry to generate a 3D model of the patient’s surface. This geometric model can be made to look like a digital camera image if wrapped with a gray-level image (texture mapping) that shows surface coloration. The system is calibrated to the linac coordinate system and has been designed as a patient setup device. To reproduce patient position in fractionated radiotherapy, the daily patient surface model is registered to a previously recorded reference surface. Using surface registration, the system calculates the rigid-body transformation that minimizes the distance between the treatment and the reference surface models in a region-of-interest (ROI). This transformation is expressed as a set of new couch coordinates at which the patient position best matches with the reference data. If respiratory motion is a concern, the surface can be obtained with a gated acquisition at a specified phase of the respiratory cycle. To analyze the accuracy of the system, we performed several experiments with phantoms to assess stability, alignment accuracy, precision of the gating function, and surface topology. The reproducibility of surface measurements was tested for periods up to 57 h. Each recorded frame was registered to the reference surface to calculate the required couch adjustment. The system stability over this time period was better than 0.5 mm. To measure the accuracy of the system to detect and quantify patient shift relative to a reference image, we compared the shift detected by the surface imaging system with known couch transitions in a phantom study. The maximum standard deviation was 0.75 mm for the three translational degrees of freedom, and less than 0.1° for each rotation. Surface model precision was tested against computed tomography (CT)-derived surface topology. The root-mean-square rms of the distance between the surfaces was 0.65 mm, excluding regions where beam hardening caused artifacts in the CT data. Measurements were made to test the gated acquisition mode. The time-dependent amplitude was measured with the surface imaging system and an established respiratory gating system based on infrared (IR)-marker detection. The measured motion tr
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.1984263
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_1984263_MP4263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68754748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5403-86265a49b86ff6fdcdfb02ec3cf6b03d068ef243494e456322b16d8d38d7b5643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9r1TAYxoMo7mx64ReQgCBM6My_pumNcBjzD2zohV5KSJM3O5W2qUl6xvn29tjCvJnsKpD88uN9nwehV5RcUErVe3pBayWY5E_QhomKF4KR-inaEFKLgglSnqDTlH4RQiQvyXN0QiWTkii1QT-3eNyZIYcew950k8ltGHDw2OCUIUIo9m06XqUpemMBt725bYdbnA7ze499iDga14a8g2jGAx5nAwwZJ8jT-AI986ZL8HI9z9CPj1ffLz8X118_fbncXhe2FIQXah6nNKJulPReemedbwgDy62XDeGOSAWeCS5qAaKUnLGGSqccV65qSin4GXqzeEPKrU62zWB3NgwD2KwZqZhk7Ei9Xagxht8TpKz7NlnoOjNAmJKWqipFJdQMni-gjSGlCF6Pcd47HjQl-pi4pnpNfGZfr9Kp6cHdk2vEM1AswF3bweFhk775tgo_LPxxjb91PPxnq9fy9H15s-DdowX_g_ch_jPd6Dz_Axf7uqo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68754748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Bert, Christoph ; Metheany, Katherine G. ; Doppke, Karen ; Chen, George T. Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bert, Christoph ; Metheany, Katherine G. ; Doppke, Karen ; Chen, George T. Y.</creatorcontrib><description>External beam irradiation requires precise positioning of the target relative to the treatment planning coordinate system. A three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging system for patient positioning has recently been installed in one of our linear accelerator (linac) rooms. The device utilizes close-range photogrammetry to generate a 3D model of the patient’s surface. This geometric model can be made to look like a digital camera image if wrapped with a gray-level image (texture mapping) that shows surface coloration. The system is calibrated to the linac coordinate system and has been designed as a patient setup device. To reproduce patient position in fractionated radiotherapy, the daily patient surface model is registered to a previously recorded reference surface. Using surface registration, the system calculates the rigid-body transformation that minimizes the distance between the treatment and the reference surface models in a region-of-interest (ROI). This transformation is expressed as a set of new couch coordinates at which the patient position best matches with the reference data. If respiratory motion is a concern, the surface can be obtained with a gated acquisition at a specified phase of the respiratory cycle. To analyze the accuracy of the system, we performed several experiments with phantoms to assess stability, alignment accuracy, precision of the gating function, and surface topology. The reproducibility of surface measurements was tested for periods up to 57 h. Each recorded frame was registered to the reference surface to calculate the required couch adjustment. The system stability over this time period was better than 0.5 mm. To measure the accuracy of the system to detect and quantify patient shift relative to a reference image, we compared the shift detected by the surface imaging system with known couch transitions in a phantom study. The maximum standard deviation was 0.75 mm for the three translational degrees of freedom, and less than 0.1° for each rotation. Surface model precision was tested against computed tomography (CT)-derived surface topology. The root-mean-square rms of the distance between the surfaces was 0.65 mm, excluding regions where beam hardening caused artifacts in the CT data. Measurements were made to test the gated acquisition mode. The time-dependent amplitude was measured with the surface imaging system and an established respiratory gating system based on infrared (IR)-marker detection. The measured motion trajectories from both systems were compared to the known trajectory of the stage. The standard deviations of the amplitude differences to the motor trajectory were 0.04 and 0.15 mm for the IR-marker system and the 3D surface imaging system, respectively. A limitation of the surface-imaging device is the frame rate of 6.5 Hz, because rapid changes of the motion trajectory cannot be detected. In conclusion, the system is accurate and sufficiently stable to be used in the clinic. The errors computed when comparing the surface model with CT geometry were submillimeter, and deviations in the alignment and gating-signal tests were of the same magnitude.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.1984263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16266088</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ACCURACY ; biomedical optical imaging ; Calibration ; Cameras ; Computed tomography ; computerised tomography ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Image analysis ; IMAGE PROCESSING ; image registration ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; LINEAR ACCELERATORS ; medical image processing ; Medical imaging ; Models, Anatomic ; patient positioning ; PATIENTS ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; photogrammetry ; Photography, photographic instruments; xerography ; Pneumodyamics, respiration ; pneumodynamics ; quality assurance ; Quality assurance in radiotherapy ; radiation therapy ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; stereo image processing ; Surface dynamics ; Surface measurements ; Surface treatments ; Topology ; Treatment strategy ; Visual imaging</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-09, Vol.32 (9), p.2753-2762</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5403-86265a49b86ff6fdcdfb02ec3cf6b03d068ef243494e456322b16d8d38d7b5643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5403-86265a49b86ff6fdcdfb02ec3cf6b03d068ef243494e456322b16d8d38d7b5643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16266088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20726224$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bert, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metheany, Katherine G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doppke, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, George T. Y.</creatorcontrib><title>A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>External beam irradiation requires precise positioning of the target relative to the treatment planning coordinate system. A three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging system for patient positioning has recently been installed in one of our linear accelerator (linac) rooms. The device utilizes close-range photogrammetry to generate a 3D model of the patient’s surface. This geometric model can be made to look like a digital camera image if wrapped with a gray-level image (texture mapping) that shows surface coloration. The system is calibrated to the linac coordinate system and has been designed as a patient setup device. To reproduce patient position in fractionated radiotherapy, the daily patient surface model is registered to a previously recorded reference surface. Using surface registration, the system calculates the rigid-body transformation that minimizes the distance between the treatment and the reference surface models in a region-of-interest (ROI). This transformation is expressed as a set of new couch coordinates at which the patient position best matches with the reference data. If respiratory motion is a concern, the surface can be obtained with a gated acquisition at a specified phase of the respiratory cycle. To analyze the accuracy of the system, we performed several experiments with phantoms to assess stability, alignment accuracy, precision of the gating function, and surface topology. The reproducibility of surface measurements was tested for periods up to 57 h. Each recorded frame was registered to the reference surface to calculate the required couch adjustment. The system stability over this time period was better than 0.5 mm. To measure the accuracy of the system to detect and quantify patient shift relative to a reference image, we compared the shift detected by the surface imaging system with known couch transitions in a phantom study. The maximum standard deviation was 0.75 mm for the three translational degrees of freedom, and less than 0.1° for each rotation. Surface model precision was tested against computed tomography (CT)-derived surface topology. The root-mean-square rms of the distance between the surfaces was 0.65 mm, excluding regions where beam hardening caused artifacts in the CT data. Measurements were made to test the gated acquisition mode. The time-dependent amplitude was measured with the surface imaging system and an established respiratory gating system based on infrared (IR)-marker detection. The measured motion trajectories from both systems were compared to the known trajectory of the stage. The standard deviations of the amplitude differences to the motor trajectory were 0.04 and 0.15 mm for the IR-marker system and the 3D surface imaging system, respectively. A limitation of the surface-imaging device is the frame rate of 6.5 Hz, because rapid changes of the motion trajectory cannot be detected. In conclusion, the system is accurate and sufficiently stable to be used in the clinic. The errors computed when comparing the surface model with CT geometry were submillimeter, and deviations in the alignment and gating-signal tests were of the same magnitude.</description><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>biomedical optical imaging</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>IMAGE PROCESSING</subject><subject>image registration</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>patient positioning</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>photogrammetry</subject><subject>Photography, photographic instruments; xerography</subject><subject>Pneumodyamics, respiration</subject><subject>pneumodynamics</subject><subject>quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality assurance in radiotherapy</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>stereo image processing</subject><subject>Surface dynamics</subject><subject>Surface measurements</subject><subject>Surface treatments</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>Treatment strategy</subject><subject>Visual imaging</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV9r1TAYxoMo7mx64ReQgCBM6My_pumNcBjzD2zohV5KSJM3O5W2qUl6xvn29tjCvJnsKpD88uN9nwehV5RcUErVe3pBayWY5E_QhomKF4KR-inaEFKLgglSnqDTlH4RQiQvyXN0QiWTkii1QT-3eNyZIYcew950k8ltGHDw2OCUIUIo9m06XqUpemMBt725bYdbnA7ze499iDga14a8g2jGAx5nAwwZJ8jT-AI986ZL8HI9z9CPj1ffLz8X118_fbncXhe2FIQXah6nNKJulPReemedbwgDy62XDeGOSAWeCS5qAaKUnLGGSqccV65qSin4GXqzeEPKrU62zWB3NgwD2KwZqZhk7Ei9Xagxht8TpKz7NlnoOjNAmJKWqipFJdQMni-gjSGlCF6Pcd47HjQl-pi4pnpNfGZfr9Kp6cHdk2vEM1AswF3bweFhk775tgo_LPxxjb91PPxnq9fy9H15s-DdowX_g_ch_jPd6Dz_Axf7uqo</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Bert, Christoph</creator><creator>Metheany, Katherine G.</creator><creator>Doppke, Karen</creator><creator>Chen, George T. Y.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup</title><author>Bert, Christoph ; Metheany, Katherine G. ; Doppke, Karen ; Chen, George T. Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5403-86265a49b86ff6fdcdfb02ec3cf6b03d068ef243494e456322b16d8d38d7b5643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>biomedical optical imaging</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>IMAGE PROCESSING</topic><topic>image registration</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>patient positioning</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>photogrammetry</topic><topic>Photography, photographic instruments; xerography</topic><topic>Pneumodyamics, respiration</topic><topic>pneumodynamics</topic><topic>quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality assurance in radiotherapy</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>stereo image processing</topic><topic>Surface dynamics</topic><topic>Surface measurements</topic><topic>Surface treatments</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>Treatment strategy</topic><topic>Visual imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bert, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metheany, Katherine G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doppke, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, George T. Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bert, Christoph</au><au>Metheany, Katherine G.</au><au>Doppke, Karen</au><au>Chen, George T. Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2753</spage><epage>2762</epage><pages>2753-2762</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>External beam irradiation requires precise positioning of the target relative to the treatment planning coordinate system. A three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging system for patient positioning has recently been installed in one of our linear accelerator (linac) rooms. The device utilizes close-range photogrammetry to generate a 3D model of the patient’s surface. This geometric model can be made to look like a digital camera image if wrapped with a gray-level image (texture mapping) that shows surface coloration. The system is calibrated to the linac coordinate system and has been designed as a patient setup device. To reproduce patient position in fractionated radiotherapy, the daily patient surface model is registered to a previously recorded reference surface. Using surface registration, the system calculates the rigid-body transformation that minimizes the distance between the treatment and the reference surface models in a region-of-interest (ROI). This transformation is expressed as a set of new couch coordinates at which the patient position best matches with the reference data. If respiratory motion is a concern, the surface can be obtained with a gated acquisition at a specified phase of the respiratory cycle. To analyze the accuracy of the system, we performed several experiments with phantoms to assess stability, alignment accuracy, precision of the gating function, and surface topology. The reproducibility of surface measurements was tested for periods up to 57 h. Each recorded frame was registered to the reference surface to calculate the required couch adjustment. The system stability over this time period was better than 0.5 mm. To measure the accuracy of the system to detect and quantify patient shift relative to a reference image, we compared the shift detected by the surface imaging system with known couch transitions in a phantom study. The maximum standard deviation was 0.75 mm for the three translational degrees of freedom, and less than 0.1° for each rotation. Surface model precision was tested against computed tomography (CT)-derived surface topology. The root-mean-square rms of the distance between the surfaces was 0.65 mm, excluding regions where beam hardening caused artifacts in the CT data. Measurements were made to test the gated acquisition mode. The time-dependent amplitude was measured with the surface imaging system and an established respiratory gating system based on infrared (IR)-marker detection. The measured motion trajectories from both systems were compared to the known trajectory of the stage. The standard deviations of the amplitude differences to the motor trajectory were 0.04 and 0.15 mm for the IR-marker system and the 3D surface imaging system, respectively. A limitation of the surface-imaging device is the frame rate of 6.5 Hz, because rapid changes of the motion trajectory cannot be detected. In conclusion, the system is accurate and sufficiently stable to be used in the clinic. The errors computed when comparing the surface model with CT geometry were submillimeter, and deviations in the alignment and gating-signal tests were of the same magnitude.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>16266088</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.1984263</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-09, Vol.32 (9), p.2753-2762
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_1984263_MP4263
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects ACCURACY
biomedical optical imaging
Calibration
Cameras
Computed tomography
computerised tomography
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
Hemodynamics
Humans
Image analysis
IMAGE PROCESSING
image registration
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
LINEAR ACCELERATORS
medical image processing
Medical imaging
Models, Anatomic
patient positioning
PATIENTS
PHANTOMS
Phantoms, Imaging
photogrammetry
Photography, photographic instruments
xerography
Pneumodyamics, respiration
pneumodynamics
quality assurance
Quality assurance in radiotherapy
radiation therapy
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
stereo image processing
Surface dynamics
Surface measurements
Surface treatments
Topology
Treatment strategy
Visual imaging
title A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20phantom%20evaluation%20of%20a%20stereo-vision%20surface%20imaging%20system%20for%20radiotherapy%20patient%20setup&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Bert,%20Christoph&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2753&rft.epage=2762&rft.pages=2753-2762&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.1984263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E68754748%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5403-86265a49b86ff6fdcdfb02ec3cf6b03d068ef243494e456322b16d8d38d7b5643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68754748&rft_id=info:pmid/16266088&rfr_iscdi=true