Loading…

Sci—Fri PM: Delivery — 02: CT image guidance strategies for dose‐adaptive IMRT of the prostate

On‐line CT imaging in the radiotherapy room has become the norm for targeted intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), enabling precise adjustments of the daily patient setup based on soft tissue visualization. Corrections for plasticity of the anatomy and dose deformation are within technological re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4642-4642
Main Authors: Battista, J, Johnson, C, Kempe, J, Turnbull, D, VanDyk, J, Bauman, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 4642
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4642
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 39
creator Battista, J
Johnson, C
Kempe, J
Turnbull, D
VanDyk, J
Bauman, G
description On‐line CT imaging in the radiotherapy room has become the norm for targeted intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), enabling precise adjustments of the daily patient setup based on soft tissue visualization. Corrections for plasticity of the anatomy and dose deformation are within technological reach but will require more on‐line resources. We have developed a computer model that allows exploration of “what if” scenarios for assessing the benefits of Image Guidance strategies in terms of the multi‐fraction dose distribution and DVH metrics (Target D95 and rectum V70). In this work we report on changes in anatomy and resultant dose distribution as observed in 35 daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) scans of the pelvis during prostate therapy for 13 patients. Our goal is to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of various adaptive strategies involving imaging schedule with and without dose re‐planning of 5‐field IMRT with 18 MV x‐rays. Our research questions are: To what extent do radiation dose distributions delivered to individual patients (in vivo) diverge from the planned dose distributions (in silico)? Is there a robust schedule of CT image guidance, with or without dose re‐planning that will mitigate discrepancies? For prostate IMRT, we conclude that image guidance schedule can be relaxed when generous GTV margins (10/7mm) are used. Tighter margins (isotropic 5 mm) reduce the dose to the rectum as expected. However, daily re‐planning may be required to maintain adequate target coverage as planned when tighter margins are used.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4740197
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4740197_MP0197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900123596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2687-26c0bf33a4b4e3177d5dc3d33682b6dcd15c586d8901cf3dd70a41b4168019b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1OGzEUBWCrKmpS6IIXQF62lSbca3s8M-yqUH6kRESQrkce2xNcTTLBnoCy4xG64Al5EowSEBIqK0vWd499DyH7CANEzA9xIDIBWGSfSJ-JjCeCQfGZ9AEKkTABaY98DeEvAEiewhfSY3mKUnLsE3Ol3eP9w4l3dDI-ose2cbfWr2m8o8CO6HBK3VzNLJ2tnFELbWnovOrszNlA69ZT0wb7eP9PGbXs4ig9H19OaVvT7trSpW9DF_Ee2alVE-y37blL_pz8ng7PktHF6fnw1yjRTOZZwqSGquZciUpYjllmUqO54VzmrJJGG0x1mkuTF4C65sZkoARWAmUel68Kvku-b3LjwzcrG7py7oK2TaMWtl2FEgsAZDwtZKQ_NlTHPwZv63Lp46J-XSKUz6WWWG5LjfZgG7uq5ta8ypcWI0g24M41dv3_pHI82Qb-3PigXezHtYvXmdvWv_FLU3-E33_1CbuWm2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900123596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sci—Fri PM: Delivery — 02: CT image guidance strategies for dose‐adaptive IMRT of the prostate</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Battista, J ; Johnson, C ; Kempe, J ; Turnbull, D ; VanDyk, J ; Bauman, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Battista, J ; Johnson, C ; Kempe, J ; Turnbull, D ; VanDyk, J ; Bauman, G</creatorcontrib><description>On‐line CT imaging in the radiotherapy room has become the norm for targeted intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), enabling precise adjustments of the daily patient setup based on soft tissue visualization. Corrections for plasticity of the anatomy and dose deformation are within technological reach but will require more on‐line resources. We have developed a computer model that allows exploration of “what if” scenarios for assessing the benefits of Image Guidance strategies in terms of the multi‐fraction dose distribution and DVH metrics (Target D95 and rectum V70). In this work we report on changes in anatomy and resultant dose distribution as observed in 35 daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) scans of the pelvis during prostate therapy for 13 patients. Our goal is to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of various adaptive strategies involving imaging schedule with and without dose re‐planning of 5‐field IMRT with 18 MV x‐rays. Our research questions are: To what extent do radiation dose distributions delivered to individual patients (in vivo) diverge from the planned dose distributions (in silico)? Is there a robust schedule of CT image guidance, with or without dose re‐planning that will mitigate discrepancies? For prostate IMRT, we conclude that image guidance schedule can be relaxed when generous GTV margins (10/7mm) are used. Tighter margins (isotropic 5 mm) reduce the dose to the rectum as expected. However, daily re‐planning may be required to maintain adequate target coverage as planned when tighter margins are used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4740197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28516631</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Computed tomography ; Computer modeling ; Dosimetry ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; Medical imaging ; Plasticity ; Radiation therapy ; Tissue engineering ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4642-4642</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28516631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Battista, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanDyk, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, G</creatorcontrib><title>Sci—Fri PM: Delivery — 02: CT image guidance strategies for dose‐adaptive IMRT of the prostate</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>On‐line CT imaging in the radiotherapy room has become the norm for targeted intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), enabling precise adjustments of the daily patient setup based on soft tissue visualization. Corrections for plasticity of the anatomy and dose deformation are within technological reach but will require more on‐line resources. We have developed a computer model that allows exploration of “what if” scenarios for assessing the benefits of Image Guidance strategies in terms of the multi‐fraction dose distribution and DVH metrics (Target D95 and rectum V70). In this work we report on changes in anatomy and resultant dose distribution as observed in 35 daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) scans of the pelvis during prostate therapy for 13 patients. Our goal is to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of various adaptive strategies involving imaging schedule with and without dose re‐planning of 5‐field IMRT with 18 MV x‐rays. Our research questions are: To what extent do radiation dose distributions delivered to individual patients (in vivo) diverge from the planned dose distributions (in silico)? Is there a robust schedule of CT image guidance, with or without dose re‐planning that will mitigate discrepancies? For prostate IMRT, we conclude that image guidance schedule can be relaxed when generous GTV margins (10/7mm) are used. Tighter margins (isotropic 5 mm) reduce the dose to the rectum as expected. However, daily re‐planning may be required to maintain adequate target coverage as planned when tighter margins are used.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer modeling</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1OGzEUBWCrKmpS6IIXQF62lSbca3s8M-yqUH6kRESQrkce2xNcTTLBnoCy4xG64Al5EowSEBIqK0vWd499DyH7CANEzA9xIDIBWGSfSJ-JjCeCQfGZ9AEKkTABaY98DeEvAEiewhfSY3mKUnLsE3Ol3eP9w4l3dDI-ose2cbfWr2m8o8CO6HBK3VzNLJ2tnFELbWnovOrszNlA69ZT0wb7eP9PGbXs4ig9H19OaVvT7trSpW9DF_Ee2alVE-y37blL_pz8ng7PktHF6fnw1yjRTOZZwqSGquZciUpYjllmUqO54VzmrJJGG0x1mkuTF4C65sZkoARWAmUel68Kvku-b3LjwzcrG7py7oK2TaMWtl2FEgsAZDwtZKQ_NlTHPwZv63Lp46J-XSKUz6WWWG5LjfZgG7uq5ta8ypcWI0g24M41dv3_pHI82Qb-3PigXezHtYvXmdvWv_FLU3-E33_1CbuWm2w</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Battista, J</creator><creator>Johnson, C</creator><creator>Kempe, J</creator><creator>Turnbull, D</creator><creator>VanDyk, J</creator><creator>Bauman, G</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Sci—Fri PM: Delivery — 02: CT image guidance strategies for dose‐adaptive IMRT of the prostate</title><author>Battista, J ; Johnson, C ; Kempe, J ; Turnbull, D ; VanDyk, J ; Bauman, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2687-26c0bf33a4b4e3177d5dc3d33682b6dcd15c586d8901cf3dd70a41b4168019b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer modeling</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Battista, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanDyk, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Battista, J</au><au>Johnson, C</au><au>Kempe, J</au><au>Turnbull, D</au><au>VanDyk, J</au><au>Bauman, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sci—Fri PM: Delivery — 02: CT image guidance strategies for dose‐adaptive IMRT of the prostate</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4642</spage><epage>4642</epage><pages>4642-4642</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>On‐line CT imaging in the radiotherapy room has become the norm for targeted intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), enabling precise adjustments of the daily patient setup based on soft tissue visualization. Corrections for plasticity of the anatomy and dose deformation are within technological reach but will require more on‐line resources. We have developed a computer model that allows exploration of “what if” scenarios for assessing the benefits of Image Guidance strategies in terms of the multi‐fraction dose distribution and DVH metrics (Target D95 and rectum V70). In this work we report on changes in anatomy and resultant dose distribution as observed in 35 daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) scans of the pelvis during prostate therapy for 13 patients. Our goal is to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of various adaptive strategies involving imaging schedule with and without dose re‐planning of 5‐field IMRT with 18 MV x‐rays. Our research questions are: To what extent do radiation dose distributions delivered to individual patients (in vivo) diverge from the planned dose distributions (in silico)? Is there a robust schedule of CT image guidance, with or without dose re‐planning that will mitigate discrepancies? For prostate IMRT, we conclude that image guidance schedule can be relaxed when generous GTV margins (10/7mm) are used. Tighter margins (isotropic 5 mm) reduce the dose to the rectum as expected. However, daily re‐planning may be required to maintain adequate target coverage as planned when tighter margins are used.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>28516631</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4740197</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4642-4642
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4740197_MP0197
source Wiley
subjects Anatomy
Computed tomography
Computer modeling
Dosimetry
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
Medical imaging
Plasticity
Radiation therapy
Tissue engineering
Tissues
title Sci—Fri PM: Delivery — 02: CT image guidance strategies for dose‐adaptive IMRT of the prostate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A22%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sci%E2%80%94Fri%20PM:%20Delivery%20%E2%80%94%2002:%20CT%20image%20guidance%20strategies%20for%20dose%E2%80%90adaptive%20IMRT%20of%20the%20prostate&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Battista,%20J&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4642&rft.epage=4642&rft.pages=4642-4642&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4740197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1900123596%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2687-26c0bf33a4b4e3177d5dc3d33682b6dcd15c586d8901cf3dd70a41b4168019b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900123596&rft_id=info:pmid/28516631&rfr_iscdi=true