Loading…
Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies
Purpose: Ultrasound can be used to noninvasively produce different bioeffects via viscous heating, acoustic cavitation, or their combination, and these effects can be exploited to develop a wide range of therapies for cancer and other disorders. In order to accurately localize and control these diff...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2013-11, Vol.40 (11), p.112901-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-c48ee8ca2e069e35cd43ae527f0fb2ab76b7bd780289fad13a4775bda14b595c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-c48ee8ca2e069e35cd43ae527f0fb2ab76b7bd780289fad13a4775bda14b595c3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 112901 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Arvanitis, Costas D. McDannold, Nathan |
description | Purpose:
Ultrasound can be used to noninvasively produce different bioeffects via viscous heating, acoustic cavitation, or their combination, and these effects can be exploited to develop a wide range of therapies for cancer and other disorders. In order to accurately localize and control these different effects, imaging methods are desired that can map both temperature changes and cavitation activity. To address these needs, the authors integrated an ultrasound imaging array into an MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) system to simultaneously visualize thermal and mechanical effects via passive acoustic mapping (PAM) and MR temperature imaging (MRTI), respectively.
Methods:
The system was tested with an MRgFUS system developed for transcranial sonication for brain tumor ablation in experiments with a tissue mimicking phantom and a phantom-filledex vivo macaque skull. In experiments on cavitation-enhanced heating, 10 s continuous wave sonications were applied at increasing power levels (30–110 W) until broadband acoustic emissions (a signature for inertial cavitation) were evident. The presence or lack of signal in the PAM, as well as its magnitude and location, were compared to the focal heating in the MRTI. Additional experiments compared PAM with standard B-mode ultrasound imaging and tested the feasibility of the system to map cavitation activity produced during low-power (5 W) burst sonications in a channel filled with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent.
Results:
When inertial cavitation was evident, localized activity was present in PAM and a marked increase in heating was observed in MRTI. The location of the cavitation activity and heating agreed on average after registration of the two imaging modalities; the distance between the maximum cavitation activity and focal heating was −3.4 ± 2.1 mm and −0.1 ± 3.3 mm in the axial and transverse ultrasound array directions, respectively. Distortions and other MRI issues introduced small uncertainties in the PAM/MRTI registration. Although there was substantial variation, a nonlinear relationship between the average intensity of the cavitation maps, which was relatively constant during sonication, and the peak temperature rise was evident. A fit to the data to an exponential had a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.62. The system was also found to be capable of visualizing cavitation activity with B-mode imaging and of passively mapping cavitation activity transcranially during cavitation-enhanced h |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.4823793 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4823793_MP3793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1467068470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-c48ee8ca2e069e35cd43ae527f0fb2ab76b7bd780289fad13a4775bda14b595c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAYhYMoznV04R-QLlXomK826UaQwY-BEV3oOqTJ2zuRNqlJemV-hX_ZjK2XGUQXIZA857wnOQg9JfiMECJfkTMuKRMdu4d2lAtWc4q7-2iHccdrynFzgh6l9A1j3LIGP0QnlDOKeSt36OeFz7CPOoOtljFHncLibaXLmvTeQ3amipCC195A5cqZ8_tqCLFKbioC7SEsqcowzVBclgi_tUYfXNbZBV9Nwbsc4o3MLnFVmyXdnZevinp2kB6jB4MeEzzZ9lP09d3bL-cf6stP7y_O31zWpuEdqw2XANJoCrjtgDXGcqahoWLAQ091L9pe9FZITGU3aEuY5kI0vdWE903XGHaKXq--89JPYA34kmVUcyxPjNcqaKfu3nh3pfbhoJjEkktZDJ5vBjF8XyBlNblkYBzXH1GEtwK3kgtc0BcramJIKcJwHEOwuilQEbUVWNhnt3MdyT-NFaBegR9uhOt_O6mPnzfDlyufzNbIUXMI8RY_2-F_8N9RfwGjysX1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467068470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Arvanitis, Costas D. ; McDannold, Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Arvanitis, Costas D. ; McDannold, Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
Ultrasound can be used to noninvasively produce different bioeffects via viscous heating, acoustic cavitation, or their combination, and these effects can be exploited to develop a wide range of therapies for cancer and other disorders. In order to accurately localize and control these different effects, imaging methods are desired that can map both temperature changes and cavitation activity. To address these needs, the authors integrated an ultrasound imaging array into an MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) system to simultaneously visualize thermal and mechanical effects via passive acoustic mapping (PAM) and MR temperature imaging (MRTI), respectively.
Methods:
The system was tested with an MRgFUS system developed for transcranial sonication for brain tumor ablation in experiments with a tissue mimicking phantom and a phantom-filledex vivo macaque skull. In experiments on cavitation-enhanced heating, 10 s continuous wave sonications were applied at increasing power levels (30–110 W) until broadband acoustic emissions (a signature for inertial cavitation) were evident. The presence or lack of signal in the PAM, as well as its magnitude and location, were compared to the focal heating in the MRTI. Additional experiments compared PAM with standard B-mode ultrasound imaging and tested the feasibility of the system to map cavitation activity produced during low-power (5 W) burst sonications in a channel filled with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent.
Results:
When inertial cavitation was evident, localized activity was present in PAM and a marked increase in heating was observed in MRTI. The location of the cavitation activity and heating agreed on average after registration of the two imaging modalities; the distance between the maximum cavitation activity and focal heating was −3.4 ± 2.1 mm and −0.1 ± 3.3 mm in the axial and transverse ultrasound array directions, respectively. Distortions and other MRI issues introduced small uncertainties in the PAM/MRTI registration. Although there was substantial variation, a nonlinear relationship between the average intensity of the cavitation maps, which was relatively constant during sonication, and the peak temperature rise was evident. A fit to the data to an exponential had a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.62. The system was also found to be capable of visualizing cavitation activity with B-mode imaging and of passively mapping cavitation activity transcranially during cavitation-enhanced heating and during low-power sonication with an ultrasound contrast agent.
Conclusions:
The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of integrating an ultrasound imaging array into an MRgFUS system to simultaneously map localized cavitation activity and temperature. The authors anticipate that this integrated approach can be utilized to develop controllers for cavitation-enhanced ablation and facilitate the optimization and development of this and other ultrasound therapies. The integrated system may also provide a useful tool to study the bioeffects of acoustic cavitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4823793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24320468</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Acoustic cavitation ; Acoustic emission ; Acoustical effects ; Acoustics ; Anatomic imaging ; Biological effects of acoustic and ultrasonic energy ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; biomedical MRI ; biomedical ultrasonics ; biothermics ; brain ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - therapy ; bubbles ; cancer ; cavitation ; cavitation enhanced ablation ; cavitation mapping ; Clinical applications ; Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of biological matter ; Fluid bubbles ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; image guided FUS ; image registration ; Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; medical disorders ; medical image processing ; Medical imaging ; Microbubbles ; MR thermometry ; Neoplasms - therapy ; optimisation ; phantoms ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Registration ; Skull - diagnostic imaging ; Sonication ; tumours ; Ultrasonic effects ; Ultrasonic Therapy ; Ultrasonographic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound Physics ; Ultrasound therapy ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-11, Vol.40 (11), p.112901-n/a</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Published by American Association of Physicists in Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Author(s). 2013 Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-c48ee8ca2e069e35cd43ae527f0fb2ab76b7bd780289fad13a4775bda14b595c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-c48ee8ca2e069e35cd43ae527f0fb2ab76b7bd780289fad13a4775bda14b595c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27900,27901</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24320468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arvanitis, Costas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDannold, Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose:
Ultrasound can be used to noninvasively produce different bioeffects via viscous heating, acoustic cavitation, or their combination, and these effects can be exploited to develop a wide range of therapies for cancer and other disorders. In order to accurately localize and control these different effects, imaging methods are desired that can map both temperature changes and cavitation activity. To address these needs, the authors integrated an ultrasound imaging array into an MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) system to simultaneously visualize thermal and mechanical effects via passive acoustic mapping (PAM) and MR temperature imaging (MRTI), respectively.
Methods:
The system was tested with an MRgFUS system developed for transcranial sonication for brain tumor ablation in experiments with a tissue mimicking phantom and a phantom-filledex vivo macaque skull. In experiments on cavitation-enhanced heating, 10 s continuous wave sonications were applied at increasing power levels (30–110 W) until broadband acoustic emissions (a signature for inertial cavitation) were evident. The presence or lack of signal in the PAM, as well as its magnitude and location, were compared to the focal heating in the MRTI. Additional experiments compared PAM with standard B-mode ultrasound imaging and tested the feasibility of the system to map cavitation activity produced during low-power (5 W) burst sonications in a channel filled with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent.
Results:
When inertial cavitation was evident, localized activity was present in PAM and a marked increase in heating was observed in MRTI. The location of the cavitation activity and heating agreed on average after registration of the two imaging modalities; the distance between the maximum cavitation activity and focal heating was −3.4 ± 2.1 mm and −0.1 ± 3.3 mm in the axial and transverse ultrasound array directions, respectively. Distortions and other MRI issues introduced small uncertainties in the PAM/MRTI registration. Although there was substantial variation, a nonlinear relationship between the average intensity of the cavitation maps, which was relatively constant during sonication, and the peak temperature rise was evident. A fit to the data to an exponential had a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.62. The system was also found to be capable of visualizing cavitation activity with B-mode imaging and of passively mapping cavitation activity transcranially during cavitation-enhanced heating and during low-power sonication with an ultrasound contrast agent.
Conclusions:
The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of integrating an ultrasound imaging array into an MRgFUS system to simultaneously map localized cavitation activity and temperature. The authors anticipate that this integrated approach can be utilized to develop controllers for cavitation-enhanced ablation and facilitate the optimization and development of this and other ultrasound therapies. The integrated system may also provide a useful tool to study the bioeffects of acoustic cavitation.</description><subject>Acoustic cavitation</subject><subject>Acoustic emission</subject><subject>Acoustical effects</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Anatomic imaging</subject><subject>Biological effects of acoustic and ultrasonic energy</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>biomedical MRI</subject><subject>biomedical ultrasonics</subject><subject>biothermics</subject><subject>brain</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>bubbles</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>cavitation</subject><subject>cavitation enhanced ablation</subject><subject>cavitation mapping</subject><subject>Clinical applications</subject><subject>Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of biological matter</subject><subject>Fluid bubbles</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>image guided FUS</subject><subject>image registration</subject><subject>Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>medical disorders</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Microbubbles</subject><subject>MR thermometry</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>optimisation</subject><subject>phantoms</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Skull - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sonication</subject><subject>tumours</subject><subject>Ultrasonic effects</subject><subject>Ultrasonic Therapy</subject><subject>Ultrasonographic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound Physics</subject><subject>Ultrasound therapy</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>0094-2405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AJDQP</sourceid><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAYhYMoznV04R-QLlXomK826UaQwY-BEV3oOqTJ2zuRNqlJemV-hX_ZjK2XGUQXIZA857wnOQg9JfiMECJfkTMuKRMdu4d2lAtWc4q7-2iHccdrynFzgh6l9A1j3LIGP0QnlDOKeSt36OeFz7CPOoOtljFHncLibaXLmvTeQ3amipCC195A5cqZ8_tqCLFKbioC7SEsqcowzVBclgi_tUYfXNbZBV9Nwbsc4o3MLnFVmyXdnZevinp2kB6jB4MeEzzZ9lP09d3bL-cf6stP7y_O31zWpuEdqw2XANJoCrjtgDXGcqahoWLAQ091L9pe9FZITGU3aEuY5kI0vdWE903XGHaKXq--89JPYA34kmVUcyxPjNcqaKfu3nh3pfbhoJjEkktZDJ5vBjF8XyBlNblkYBzXH1GEtwK3kgtc0BcramJIKcJwHEOwuilQEbUVWNhnt3MdyT-NFaBegR9uhOt_O6mPnzfDlyufzNbIUXMI8RY_2-F_8N9RfwGjysX1</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Arvanitis, Costas D.</creator><creator>McDannold, Nathan</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><general>Author(s)</general><scope>AJDQP</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies</title><author>Arvanitis, Costas D. ; McDannold, Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-c48ee8ca2e069e35cd43ae527f0fb2ab76b7bd780289fad13a4775bda14b595c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acoustic cavitation</topic><topic>Acoustic emission</topic><topic>Acoustical effects</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Anatomic imaging</topic><topic>Biological effects of acoustic and ultrasonic energy</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>biomedical MRI</topic><topic>biomedical ultrasonics</topic><topic>biothermics</topic><topic>brain</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>bubbles</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>cavitation</topic><topic>cavitation enhanced ablation</topic><topic>cavitation mapping</topic><topic>Clinical applications</topic><topic>Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of biological matter</topic><topic>Fluid bubbles</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>image guided FUS</topic><topic>image registration</topic><topic>Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>medical disorders</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Microbubbles</topic><topic>MR thermometry</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>optimisation</topic><topic>phantoms</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Skull - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sonication</topic><topic>tumours</topic><topic>Ultrasonic effects</topic><topic>Ultrasonic Therapy</topic><topic>Ultrasonographic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound Physics</topic><topic>Ultrasound therapy</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arvanitis, Costas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDannold, Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>AIP Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arvanitis, Costas D.</au><au>McDannold, Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>112901</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>112901-n/a</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><eissn>0094-2405</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose:
Ultrasound can be used to noninvasively produce different bioeffects via viscous heating, acoustic cavitation, or their combination, and these effects can be exploited to develop a wide range of therapies for cancer and other disorders. In order to accurately localize and control these different effects, imaging methods are desired that can map both temperature changes and cavitation activity. To address these needs, the authors integrated an ultrasound imaging array into an MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) system to simultaneously visualize thermal and mechanical effects via passive acoustic mapping (PAM) and MR temperature imaging (MRTI), respectively.
Methods:
The system was tested with an MRgFUS system developed for transcranial sonication for brain tumor ablation in experiments with a tissue mimicking phantom and a phantom-filledex vivo macaque skull. In experiments on cavitation-enhanced heating, 10 s continuous wave sonications were applied at increasing power levels (30–110 W) until broadband acoustic emissions (a signature for inertial cavitation) were evident. The presence or lack of signal in the PAM, as well as its magnitude and location, were compared to the focal heating in the MRTI. Additional experiments compared PAM with standard B-mode ultrasound imaging and tested the feasibility of the system to map cavitation activity produced during low-power (5 W) burst sonications in a channel filled with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent.
Results:
When inertial cavitation was evident, localized activity was present in PAM and a marked increase in heating was observed in MRTI. The location of the cavitation activity and heating agreed on average after registration of the two imaging modalities; the distance between the maximum cavitation activity and focal heating was −3.4 ± 2.1 mm and −0.1 ± 3.3 mm in the axial and transverse ultrasound array directions, respectively. Distortions and other MRI issues introduced small uncertainties in the PAM/MRTI registration. Although there was substantial variation, a nonlinear relationship between the average intensity of the cavitation maps, which was relatively constant during sonication, and the peak temperature rise was evident. A fit to the data to an exponential had a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.62. The system was also found to be capable of visualizing cavitation activity with B-mode imaging and of passively mapping cavitation activity transcranially during cavitation-enhanced heating and during low-power sonication with an ultrasound contrast agent.
Conclusions:
The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of integrating an ultrasound imaging array into an MRgFUS system to simultaneously map localized cavitation activity and temperature. The authors anticipate that this integrated approach can be utilized to develop controllers for cavitation-enhanced ablation and facilitate the optimization and development of this and other ultrasound therapies. The integrated system may also provide a useful tool to study the bioeffects of acoustic cavitation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>24320468</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4823793</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-11, Vol.40 (11), p.112901-n/a |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 0094-2405 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4823793_MP3793 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Acoustic cavitation Acoustic emission Acoustical effects Acoustics Anatomic imaging Biological effects of acoustic and ultrasonic energy Biological material, e.g. blood, urine Haemocytometers biomedical MRI biomedical ultrasonics biothermics brain Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Brain Neoplasms - therapy bubbles cancer cavitation cavitation enhanced ablation cavitation mapping Clinical applications Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications Electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of biological matter Fluid bubbles Hot Temperature Humans Image data processing or generation, in general image guided FUS image registration Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging medical disorders medical image processing Medical imaging Microbubbles MR thermometry Neoplasms - therapy optimisation phantoms Phantoms, Imaging Registration Skull - diagnostic imaging Sonication tumours Ultrasonic effects Ultrasonic Therapy Ultrasonographic imaging Ultrasonography Ultrasound Physics Ultrasound therapy Viscosity |
title | Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T04%3A17%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20ultrasound%20and%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20for%20simultaneous%20temperature%20and%20cavitation%20monitoring%20during%20focused%20ultrasound%20therapies&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Arvanitis,%20Costas%20D.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=112901&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=112901-n/a&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4823793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1467068470%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-c48ee8ca2e069e35cd43ae527f0fb2ab76b7bd780289fad13a4775bda14b595c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467068470&rft_id=info:pmid/24320468&rfr_iscdi=true |