Loading…
A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol
Objectives (1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient...
Saved in:
Published in: | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2016-04, Vol.154 (4), p.731-734 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; jpn |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 734 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 731 |
container_title | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery |
container_volume | 154 |
creator | Wirtz, Nicholas Tibesar, Robert J. Lander, Timothy Sidman, James |
description | Objectives
(1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population.
Study Design
Case series with chart review.
Setting
A tertiary pediatric hospital.
Subjects
Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma.
Methods
Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed.
Results
Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days.
Conclusion
This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0194599816628522 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1177_0194599816628522_OHNBF07679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>OHNBF07679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj0FLw0AQRhexYGy9ewzeozO7m5mdY63WCsX2oOew2WwhEhNJItJ_r6GehA--w4MHT6lrhFtE5jtAsbmIQyLtcq3PVIIgnJFDPlfJhLOJX6jLYXgHACLmRN0s032saj_2dUgfYvBt-9X4se7adN93Yxe6ZqFmB98M8erv5-pt_fi62mTb3dPzarnNApKWrAwOqpw9GIjOopeKczYBf-cjSaDSWLFA1iMBMpas0WiWgxXhsvRmrtzJ-1038Vh89vWH748FQjEFFv8Di93m5X4NTCzmBwQcQwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Wirtz, Nicholas ; Tibesar, Robert J. ; Lander, Timothy ; Sidman, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Nicholas ; Tibesar, Robert J. ; Lander, Timothy ; Sidman, James</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
(1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population.
Study Design
Case series with chart review.
Setting
A tertiary pediatric hospital.
Subjects
Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma.
Methods
Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed.
Results
Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days.
Conclusion
This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0194599816628522</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><publisher>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>decannulation ; protocol ; tracheostomy</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2016-04, Vol.154 (4), p.731-734</ispartof><rights>2016 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibesar, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lander, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidman, James</creatorcontrib><title>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><description>Objectives
(1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population.
Study Design
Case series with chart review.
Setting
A tertiary pediatric hospital.
Subjects
Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma.
Methods
Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed.
Results
Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days.
Conclusion
This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.</description><subject>decannulation</subject><subject>protocol</subject><subject>tracheostomy</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpdj0FLw0AQRhexYGy9ewzeozO7m5mdY63WCsX2oOew2WwhEhNJItJ_r6GehA--w4MHT6lrhFtE5jtAsbmIQyLtcq3PVIIgnJFDPlfJhLOJX6jLYXgHACLmRN0s032saj_2dUgfYvBt-9X4se7adN93Yxe6ZqFmB98M8erv5-pt_fi62mTb3dPzarnNApKWrAwOqpw9GIjOopeKczYBf-cjSaDSWLFA1iMBMpas0WiWgxXhsvRmrtzJ-1038Vh89vWH748FQjEFFv8Di93m5X4NTCzmBwQcQwM</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Wirtz, Nicholas</creator><creator>Tibesar, Robert J.</creator><creator>Lander, Timothy</creator><creator>Sidman, James</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</title><author>Wirtz, Nicholas ; Tibesar, Robert J. ; Lander, Timothy ; Sidman, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>decannulation</topic><topic>protocol</topic><topic>tracheostomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibesar, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lander, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidman, James</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wirtz, Nicholas</au><au>Tibesar, Robert J.</au><au>Lander, Timothy</au><au>Sidman, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>734</epage><pages>731-734</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Objectives
(1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population.
Study Design
Case series with chart review.
Setting
A tertiary pediatric hospital.
Subjects
Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma.
Methods
Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed.
Results
Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days.
Conclusion
This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.</abstract><cop>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0194599816628522</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0194-5998 |
ispartof | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2016-04, Vol.154 (4), p.731-734 |
issn | 0194-5998 1097-6817 |
language | eng ; jpn |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1177_0194599816628522_OHNBF07679 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | decannulation protocol tracheostomy |
title | A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Pediatric%20Decannulation%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Wirtz,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=734&rft.pages=731-734&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0194599816628522&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3EOHNBF07679%3C/wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |