Loading…

A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol

Objectives (1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2016-04, Vol.154 (4), p.731-734
Main Authors: Wirtz, Nicholas, Tibesar, Robert J., Lander, Timothy, Sidman, James
Format: Article
Language:eng ; jpn
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3
cites
container_end_page 734
container_issue 4
container_start_page 731
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume 154
creator Wirtz, Nicholas
Tibesar, Robert J.
Lander, Timothy
Sidman, James
description Objectives (1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting A tertiary pediatric hospital. Subjects Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma. Methods Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed. Results Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days. Conclusion This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0194599816628522
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1177_0194599816628522_OHNBF07679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>OHNBF07679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj0FLw0AQRhexYGy9ewzeozO7m5mdY63WCsX2oOew2WwhEhNJItJ_r6GehA--w4MHT6lrhFtE5jtAsbmIQyLtcq3PVIIgnJFDPlfJhLOJX6jLYXgHACLmRN0s032saj_2dUgfYvBt-9X4se7adN93Yxe6ZqFmB98M8erv5-pt_fi62mTb3dPzarnNApKWrAwOqpw9GIjOopeKczYBf-cjSaDSWLFA1iMBMpas0WiWgxXhsvRmrtzJ-1038Vh89vWH748FQjEFFv8Di93m5X4NTCzmBwQcQwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Wirtz, Nicholas ; Tibesar, Robert J. ; Lander, Timothy ; Sidman, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Nicholas ; Tibesar, Robert J. ; Lander, Timothy ; Sidman, James</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives (1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting A tertiary pediatric hospital. Subjects Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma. Methods Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed. Results Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days. Conclusion This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0194599816628522</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><publisher>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>decannulation ; protocol ; tracheostomy</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2016-04, Vol.154 (4), p.731-734</ispartof><rights>2016 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibesar, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lander, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidman, James</creatorcontrib><title>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><description>Objectives (1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting A tertiary pediatric hospital. Subjects Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma. Methods Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed. Results Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days. Conclusion This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.</description><subject>decannulation</subject><subject>protocol</subject><subject>tracheostomy</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpdj0FLw0AQRhexYGy9ewzeozO7m5mdY63WCsX2oOew2WwhEhNJItJ_r6GehA--w4MHT6lrhFtE5jtAsbmIQyLtcq3PVIIgnJFDPlfJhLOJX6jLYXgHACLmRN0s032saj_2dUgfYvBt-9X4se7adN93Yxe6ZqFmB98M8erv5-pt_fi62mTb3dPzarnNApKWrAwOqpw9GIjOopeKczYBf-cjSaDSWLFA1iMBMpas0WiWgxXhsvRmrtzJ-1038Vh89vWH748FQjEFFv8Di93m5X4NTCzmBwQcQwM</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Wirtz, Nicholas</creator><creator>Tibesar, Robert J.</creator><creator>Lander, Timothy</creator><creator>Sidman, James</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</title><author>Wirtz, Nicholas ; Tibesar, Robert J. ; Lander, Timothy ; Sidman, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>decannulation</topic><topic>protocol</topic><topic>tracheostomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibesar, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lander, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidman, James</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wirtz, Nicholas</au><au>Tibesar, Robert J.</au><au>Lander, Timothy</au><au>Sidman, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>734</epage><pages>731-734</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Objectives (1) Describe an institutional protocol that focuses on the essential steps for decannulation of pediatric patients with long‐term tracheostomies. (2) Discuss the preliminary observations of the safety of this protocol in regard to decannulation failures and successes in a selected patient population. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting A tertiary pediatric hospital. Subjects Subjects were pediatric patients with chronic tracheostomies undergoing decannulation. Ages ranged from 1 to 17 years old. Indications for initial tracheostomy included chronic lung disease, airway obstruction, and trauma. Methods Subjects underwent decannulation attempt following a specific protocol. The protocol consisted of operative laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. If the airway was deemed adequate for decannulation at that time, the tracheotomy tube was removed, and the child was monitored overnight; the patient was considered for discharge the following day if no complications arose. No routine capping, downsizing, or polysomnography was performed. Results Thirty‐five patients fit the criteria and were decannulated within 24 hours of endoscopy. Successful decannulation served as the primary outcome. Of the 35 decannulated patients, 54% (n = 19) were discharged the day following decannulation and another 37% (n = 13) on postdecannulation day 2. There were no acute failures or readmissions. Average inpatient stay for those decannulated was 1.8 days. Conclusion This study describes the preliminary observations of a decannulation protocol in a small subset of patients. The protocol resulted in no acute failures and offers a conservative approach to resource utilization, making it unique when compared with other published protocols.</abstract><cop>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0194599816628522</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2016-04, Vol.154 (4), p.731-734
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
language eng ; jpn
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1177_0194599816628522_OHNBF07679
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects decannulation
protocol
tracheostomy
title A Pediatric Decannulation Protocol
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Pediatric%20Decannulation%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Wirtz,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=734&rft.pages=731-734&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0194599816628522&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3EOHNBF07679%3C/wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1629-bc80d57a030e841a9d7573c13c1ae69c6b3494064a160171b7213279f4997bba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true