Loading…

Abstract 14012: Opportunities to Improve the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation—Insights From a Multistate Healthcare System

IntroductionVitamin K antagonists (VKAs) effectively reduce thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation (AF), but are limited by a narrow therapeutic window. Patients with reduced time in the therapeutic range (TTR) also face an increased risk of bleeding and ischemic events. Based in part on this, c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A14012-A14012
Main Authors: Gluckman, Ty J, Ali, Amir, Wang, Mansen, Mun, Howard, Alfred, Sally, Petersen, John L
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionVitamin K antagonists (VKAs) effectively reduce thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation (AF), but are limited by a narrow therapeutic window. Patients with reduced time in the therapeutic range (TTR) also face an increased risk of bleeding and ischemic events. Based in part on this, current guidelines give preference to direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over VKAs in AF.HypothesisWe hypothesized that DOACs are underutilized among those on oral anticoagulant therapy and that TTR remains suboptimal for large numbers of individuals on VKAs in real-world settings.MethodsWe sought to evaluate a) the breakdown of OAC type and b) TTR for those on VKAs in an ambulatory population of at-risk AF patients within a large multistate healthcare system. EHR and coding (ICD-10) data were used to identify patients with AF, calculate their CHA2DS2-VASc score, and define their current antithrombotic regimen. For those on a VKA, TTR was assessed with the Rosendaal method and reported as mean values. Demographics were assessed to allow for comparison between those receiving a DOAC and a VKA, as well as, those with high (>70%) vs. low (2 (excluding female gender). Among these at-risk patients, 61,698 (60.1%) were receiving an OAC, of which 47.8% were on a VKA and 52.2% were on a DOAC. The mean TTR was 56.3%, with 37.1%, 49.9% and 60.8% with TTRs >70%, >60%, and >50%, respectively. Patients on a DOAC were more likely to be female and less likely to have heart failure, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and renal disease (p70% were more likely to be male and less likely to have heart failure, diabetes, and renal disease (p
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.14012