Loading…

Tailored versus conventional surgical debridement in complex facial lacerations in emergency department: A retrospective study

Surgical debridement is an essential step in treating complex facial lacerations (CFL). As the CFL severity increases, conventional surgical debridement (CSD) of wound edges becomes difficult and may be insufficient. Because the severity and shape of each CFL vary, it is necessary to tailor the cust...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2023-04, Vol.102 (17), p.e33572-e33572
Main Authors: Park, Byeong Kwon, Min, Jin Hong, Park, Jung Soo, You, Yeon Ho, Jeong, Won Joon, Cho, Yong Chul, Oh, Se Kwang, In, Yong Nam, Ahn, Hong Joon, Kang, Chang Shin, Kyung, Hyun woo, Kim, Joo Hak, Yang, Ho Jik, Lee, Byung Kook, Yoo, Heon Jong
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Surgical debridement is an essential step in treating complex facial lacerations (CFL). As the CFL severity increases, conventional surgical debridement (CSD) of wound edges becomes difficult and may be insufficient. Because the severity and shape of each CFL vary, it is necessary to tailor the customized pre-excisional design, that is, tailored surgical debridement (TSD), for each case before performing surgical debridement. The use of TSD can enable effective debridement of CFL with higher severity. This study aimed to compare the cosmetic outcomes and complication incidence of CSD versus TSD according to CFL severity. In this retrospective observational study, eligible patients with CFL who visited the emergency department between August 2020 and December 2021 were examined. CFL severity was graded as Grades I and II. The outcomes of CSD and TSD were compared using the scar cosmesis assessment and rating (SCAR) scale, wherein a good cosmetic outcome was defined as a SCAR score of ≤ 2. The percentage of good cosmetic outcomes between the 2 groups was compared. The SCAR score and percentage of good cosmetic outcomes between the 2 groups were compared overall and by severity. For analyzing complication incidence, asymmetry, infection, and dehiscence incidence were compared. In total, 252 patients were enrolled [121 (48.0%) CSD and 131 (52.0%) TSD]. The median SCAR scores were 3 (1–5) and 1 (0–2) in all enrolled patients ( P  
ISSN:0025-7974
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000033572