Loading…

Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account

Many of the methods commonly used to research mathematical practice, such as analyses of historical episodes or individual cases, are particularly well-suited to generating causal hypotheses, but less well-suited to testing causal hypotheses. In this paper we reflect on the contribution that the so-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Inglis, Andrew Aberdein
Format: Default Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/12084018.v1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818167215904522240
author Matthew Inglis
Andrew Aberdein
author_facet Matthew Inglis
Andrew Aberdein
author_sort Matthew Inglis (1384290)
collection Figshare
description Many of the methods commonly used to research mathematical practice, such as analyses of historical episodes or individual cases, are particularly well-suited to generating causal hypotheses, but less well-suited to testing causal hypotheses. In this paper we reflect on the contribution that the so-called hypothetico-deductive method, with a particular focus on experimental studies, can make to our understanding of mathematical practice. By way of illustration, we report an experiment that investigated how mathematicians attribute aesthetic properties to mathematical proofs. We demonstrate that perceptions of the aesthetic properties of mathematical proofs are, in some cases at least, subject to social influence. Specifically, we show that mathematicians’ aesthetic judgements tend to conform to the judgements made by others. Pedagogical implications are discussed.
format Default
Article
id rr-article-12084018
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2020
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-120840182020-04-12T00:00:00Z Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account Matthew Inglis (1384290) Andrew Aberdein (815082) Mathematical aesthetics Hypothetico-deductive method Social conformity Hypotheses Many of the methods commonly used to research mathematical practice, such as analyses of historical episodes or individual cases, are particularly well-suited to generating causal hypotheses, but less well-suited to testing causal hypotheses. In this paper we reflect on the contribution that the so-called hypothetico-deductive method, with a particular focus on experimental studies, can make to our understanding of mathematical practice. By way of illustration, we report an experiment that investigated how mathematicians attribute aesthetic properties to mathematical proofs. We demonstrate that perceptions of the aesthetic properties of mathematical proofs are, in some cases at least, subject to social influence. Specifically, we show that mathematicians’ aesthetic judgements tend to conform to the judgements made by others. Pedagogical implications are discussed. 2020-04-12T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/12084018.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Are_aesthetic_judgements_purely_aesthetic_Testing_the_social_conformity_account/12084018 CC BY 4.0
spellingShingle Mathematical aesthetics
Hypothetico-deductive method
Social conformity
Hypotheses
Matthew Inglis
Andrew Aberdein
Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account
title Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account
title_full Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account
title_fullStr Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account
title_full_unstemmed Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account
title_short Are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? Testing the social conformity account
title_sort are aesthetic judgements purely aesthetic? testing the social conformity account
topic Mathematical aesthetics
Hypothetico-deductive method
Social conformity
Hypotheses
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/12084018.v1