Loading…
Input from whom? Public reactions to consultation measures
Most legislation neither affects nor interests citizens equally. But should this variation in interest and affectedness impact who gets to influence policy reforms? This article examines US public opinion on this issue using a national survey experiment varying both the policy outcome (a bill’s pass...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Default Article |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/12814808.v1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Most legislation neither affects nor interests citizens equally. But should this variation in interest and affectedness impact who gets to influence policy reforms? This article examines US public opinion on this issue using a national survey experiment varying both the policy outcome (a bill’s passage/failure) and the type of constituency input granted by elected representatives (none/constituency surveys/targeting interested constituents/targeting affected constituents). It then compares reactions across treatment groups, examining the impact of outcome favourability as well as external and internal political efficacy. Results suggest that granting constituents explicit policy influence consistently affected perceived responsiveness in the expected manner, but that the different consultation procedures had more varied effects on decision acceptance. Furthermore, where the procedures impacted decision acceptance, they pushed the reactions of both the pleased and the displeased toward more muted responses. Finally, similar “cushion effects” were present when external and internal political efficacy were incorporated into the analysis. |
|---|