Loading…

Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study

External human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) have the potential to benefit AV–pedestrian interactions. The majority of studies investigating eHMIs have used relatively simple traffic environments, i.e., a single pedestrian crossing in front of a single eHMI on a one-lane straight road. While this appro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Fratini, Ruth Welsh, Pete Thomas
Format: Default Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/21997124.v1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818165561575604224
author Elena Fratini
Ruth Welsh
Pete Thomas
author_facet Elena Fratini
Ruth Welsh
Pete Thomas
author_sort Elena Fratini (8199777)
collection Figshare
description External human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) have the potential to benefit AV–pedestrian interactions. The majority of studies investigating eHMIs have used relatively simple traffic environments, i.e., a single pedestrian crossing in front of a single eHMI on a one-lane straight road. While this approach has proved to be efficient in providing an initial understanding of how pedestrians respond to eHMIs, it over-simplifies interactions which will be substantially more complex in real-life circumstances. A process is illustrated in a small-scale study (N = 10) to rank different crossing scenarios by level of complexity. Traffic scenarios were first developed for varying traffic density, visual complexity of the road scene, road geometry, weather and visibility conditions, and presence of distractions. These factors have been previously shown to increase difficulty and riskiness of the crossing task. The scenarios were then tested in a motion-based, virtual reality environment. Pedestrians’ perceived workload and objective crossing behaviour were measured as indirect indicators of the level of complexity of the crossing scenario. Sense of presence and simulator sickness were also recorded as a measure of the ecological validity of the virtual environment. The results indicated that some crossing scenarios were more taxing for pedestrians than others, such as those with road geometries where traffic approached from multiple directions. Further, the presence scores showed that the virtual environments experienced were found to be realistic. This paper concludes by proposing a “complex” environment to test eHMIs under more challenging crossing circumstances. 
format Default
Article
id rr-article-21997124
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2023
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-219971242023-02-02T00:00:00Z Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study Elena Fratini (8199777) Ruth Welsh (8854301) Pete Thomas (1249617) Design Other creative arts and writing external human-machine interface eHMI autonomous vehicles virtual reality head-mounted display pedestrian behaviour road safety pedestrian–vehicle interaction traffic interaction workload (SIM-TLX) <p>External human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) have the potential to benefit AV–pedestrian interactions. The majority of studies investigating eHMIs have used relatively simple traffic environments, i.e., a single pedestrian crossing in front of a single eHMI on a one-lane straight road. While this approach has proved to be efficient in providing an initial understanding of how pedestrians respond to eHMIs, it over-simplifies interactions which will be substantially more complex in real-life circumstances. A process is illustrated in a small-scale study (N = 10) to rank different crossing scenarios by level of complexity. Traffic scenarios were first developed for varying traffic density, visual complexity of the road scene, road geometry, weather and visibility conditions, and presence of distractions. These factors have been previously shown to increase difficulty and riskiness of the crossing task. The scenarios were then tested in a motion-based, virtual reality environment. Pedestrians’ perceived workload and objective crossing behaviour were measured as indirect indicators of the level of complexity of the crossing scenario. Sense of presence and simulator sickness were also recorded as a measure of the ecological validity of the virtual environment. The results indicated that some crossing scenarios were more taxing for pedestrians than others, such as those with road geometries where traffic approached from multiple directions. Further, the presence scores showed that the virtual environments experienced were found to be realistic. This paper concludes by proposing a “complex” environment to test eHMIs under more challenging crossing circumstances. </p> 2023-02-02T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/21997124.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Ranking_crossing_scenario_complexity_for_eHMIs_testing_A_virtual_reality_study/21997124 CC BY 4.0
spellingShingle Design
Other creative arts and writing
external human-machine interface
eHMI
autonomous vehicles
virtual reality
head-mounted display
pedestrian behaviour
road safety
pedestrian–vehicle interaction
traffic interaction
workload (SIM-TLX)
Elena Fratini
Ruth Welsh
Pete Thomas
Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study
title Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study
title_full Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study
title_fullStr Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study
title_full_unstemmed Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study
title_short Ranking crossing scenario complexity for eHMIs testing: A virtual reality study
title_sort ranking crossing scenario complexity for ehmis testing: a virtual reality study
topic Design
Other creative arts and writing
external human-machine interface
eHMI
autonomous vehicles
virtual reality
head-mounted display
pedestrian behaviour
road safety
pedestrian–vehicle interaction
traffic interaction
workload (SIM-TLX)
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/21997124.v1