Loading…

A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions

This thesis analyses the policing of subjectivities in encounters between audiences and educators in contemporary art institutions. Drawing on a series of European cases from my practice as an educator, it interrogates the category of the “non-specialist” that institutions employ when seeking to exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mikaela Assolent
Format: Default Thesis
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.26174/thesis.lboro.23009147.v1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818165378753232896
author Mikaela Assolent
author_facet Mikaela Assolent
author_sort Mikaela Assolent (5781143)
collection Figshare
description This thesis analyses the policing of subjectivities in encounters between audiences and educators in contemporary art institutions. Drawing on a series of European cases from my practice as an educator, it interrogates the category of the “non-specialist” that institutions employ when seeking to expand their audience base. I argue that this category is exclusionary and operates to stigmatise individuals believed to need education. At a moment of renewed calls for art institutions to be more accountable and inclusive of previously marginalised perspectives, it is important to question the role of education in the institution. This necessitates an investigation of the contradictory tendencies of education to regulate audiences while claiming to emancipate them.The primary contribution of this thesis resides in its conceptualisation of educational practices as platforms through which the marginalisation of non-specialist audiences can be both researched and challenged. I argue that educators often find themselves at the centre of divisive institutional practices that they simultaneously perpetuate and seek to mitigate. I propose and test pedagogies that contest audience categorisations with the aim of making these educational strategies available to educators and institutions for further development and implementation.The thesis investigates how the discursive marginalisation of audiences can be identified and analysed in communication material (on museum websites, social media pages, and in annual reports). It is also present in the gallery space in wall labels as well as in the placement of artworks. I analyse how audience categorisations are at play along similar lines in my educational practice and examine the pedagogical tactics that I developed to challenge them. Situated in a genealogy of critical gallery education, feminist, and queer theory, the pedagogies proposed in the thesis acknowledge and embrace different ways in which identity markers and power influence the unfolding of a learning moment. I explore and defend the notion of a “disidentified pedagogy” and show how this can be used to facilitate art interpretations that are socially situated, but not reductively attached to particular bodies.The analysis unfolds through four cases that took place between 2015 and 2018 at the Frac Lorraine (a French public contemporary art institution) and in 2019 at the Oslo biennial of art. While the primary aspects of the discussion are situated in the specific history of cultural democratisation in France, I demonstrate the relevance of the results to a wider range of public art institutions and educational environments.
format Default
Thesis
id rr-article-23009147
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2023
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-230091472023-05-24T08:09:05Z A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions Mikaela Assolent (5781143) Communication and media studies not elsewhere classified contemporary art cultural institutions cultural policies cultural mediation learning gallery education museum education queer feminism disidentification France FRAC <p dir="ltr">This thesis analyses the policing of subjectivities in encounters between audiences and educators in contemporary art institutions. Drawing on a series of European cases from my practice as an educator, it interrogates the category of the “non-specialist” that institutions employ when seeking to expand their audience base. I argue that this category is exclusionary and operates to stigmatise individuals believed to need education. At a moment of renewed calls for art institutions to be more accountable and inclusive of previously marginalised perspectives, it is important to question the role of education in the institution. This necessitates an investigation of the contradictory tendencies of education to regulate audiences while claiming to emancipate them.</p><p dir="ltr">The primary contribution of this thesis resides in its conceptualisation of educational practices as platforms through which the marginalisation of non-specialist audiences can be both researched and challenged. I argue that educators often find themselves at the centre of divisive institutional practices that they simultaneously perpetuate and seek to mitigate. I propose and test pedagogies that contest audience categorisations with the aim of making these educational strategies available to educators and institutions for further development and implementation.</p><p dir="ltr">The thesis investigates how the discursive marginalisation of audiences can be identified and analysed in communication material (on museum websites, social media pages, and in annual reports). It is also present in the gallery space in wall labels as well as in the placement of artworks. I analyse how audience categorisations are at play along similar lines in my educational practice and examine the pedagogical tactics that I developed to challenge them. Situated in a genealogy of critical gallery education, feminist, and queer theory, the pedagogies proposed in the thesis acknowledge and embrace different ways in which identity markers and power influence the unfolding of a learning moment. I explore and defend the notion of a “disidentified pedagogy” and show how this can be used to facilitate art interpretations that are socially situated, but not reductively attached to particular bodies.</p><p dir="ltr">The analysis unfolds through four cases that took place between 2015 and 2018 at the Frac Lorraine (a French public contemporary art institution) and in 2019 at the Oslo biennial of art. While the primary aspects of the discussion are situated in the specific history of cultural democratisation in France, I demonstrate the relevance of the results to a wider range of public art institutions and educational environments.</p> 2023-05-24T08:09:05Z Text Thesis 10.26174/thesis.lboro.23009147.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/A_disidentified_pedagogy_contesting_audience_categorisations_in_contemporary_art_institutions/23009147 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Communication and media studies not elsewhere classified
contemporary art
cultural institutions
cultural policies
cultural mediation
learning
gallery education
museum education
queer
feminism
disidentification
France
FRAC
Mikaela Assolent
A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions
title A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions
title_full A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions
title_fullStr A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions
title_full_unstemmed A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions
title_short A disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions
title_sort disidentified pedagogy: contesting audience categorisations in contemporary art institutions
topic Communication and media studies not elsewhere classified
contemporary art
cultural institutions
cultural policies
cultural mediation
learning
gallery education
museum education
queer
feminism
disidentification
France
FRAC
url https://dx.doi.org/10.26174/thesis.lboro.23009147.v1