Loading…
Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees
Interviews conducted with female detainees in 2019-2020.These data supports the following journal article:Ali Bilgic, Athina Gkouti, Who is entitled to feel in the age of populism? Women's resistance to migrant detention in Britain, International Affairs, Volume 97, Issue 2, March 2021, Pages 4...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Default Text |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.27278133.v1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1818176479670829056 |
|---|---|
| author | Ali Bilgic |
| author_facet | Ali Bilgic |
| author_sort | Ali Bilgic (3591167) |
| collection | Figshare |
| description | Interviews conducted with female detainees in 2019-2020.These data supports the following journal article:Ali Bilgic, Athina Gkouti, Who is entitled to feel in the age of populism? Women's resistance to migrant detention in Britain, International Affairs, Volume 97, Issue 2, March 2021, Pages 483–502, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa054Article abstractEuropean states have adopted strict migration policies, such as unlimited detention in Britain, to address increasing anti-immigrant emotions in the context of rising anti-immigrant populism. These state practices prioritize the feelings of insecurity of some population groups towards immigrants whose emotions and insecurities are politically marginalized. Consequently, whose emotions matter in politics intertwines with whose security matters. This article articulates emotions in politics of security as an entitlement, which feed into the question of who ‘merits’ security politically. By focusing on individuals to whom such entitlement is denied in the context of anti-immigrant populism, it investigates how immigrant women ‘feel’ detention and enact their emotions in their own everyday ‘felt’ security. The research is conducted through in-depth interviews with women who experienced detention in Britain. Through the method of ‘listening guide’ adapted from psychology, the research studies their narratives about their emotions before, during and after detention. By bringing together the feminist research on emotions and ‘everyday security’ approaches in International Relations, this analysis contributes to feminist IR and security studies on women's agency in the politics of security, by revealing the importance of emotional dynamics in their everyday ‘felt’ security practices. Therefore, it offers a path for feminist IR and security studies to prioritize those whom anti-immigrant populism aims to silence in the age of populism. |
| format | Default Text |
| id | rr-article-27278133 |
| institution | Loughborough University |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | Figshare |
| spelling | rr-article-272781332024-10-23T13:05:23Z Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees Ali Bilgic (3591167) Human society race and crime/justice Immigration Europe Conflict Security Defence International Relations Policy and Administration Political Science <p dir="ltr">Interviews conducted with female detainees in 2019-2020.</p><p dir="ltr">These data supports the following journal article:</p><p dir="ltr">Ali Bilgic, Athina Gkouti, Who is entitled to feel in the age of populism? Women's resistance to migrant detention in Britain, International Affairs, Volume 97, Issue 2, March 2021, Pages 483–502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa054" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa054</a></p><h2>Article abstract</h2><p dir="ltr">European states have adopted strict migration policies, such as unlimited detention in Britain, to address increasing anti-immigrant emotions in the context of rising anti-immigrant populism. These state practices prioritize the feelings of insecurity of some population groups towards immigrants whose emotions and insecurities are politically marginalized. Consequently, whose emotions matter in politics intertwines with whose security matters. This article articulates emotions in politics of security as an entitlement, which feed into the question of who ‘merits’ security politically. By focusing on individuals to whom such entitlement is denied in the context of anti-immigrant populism, it investigates how immigrant women ‘feel’ detention and enact their emotions in their own everyday ‘felt’ security. The research is conducted through in-depth interviews with women who experienced detention in Britain. Through the method of ‘listening guide’ adapted from psychology, the research studies their narratives about their emotions before, during and after detention. By bringing together the feminist research on emotions and ‘everyday security’ approaches in International Relations, this analysis contributes to feminist IR and security studies on women's agency in the politics of security, by revealing the importance of emotional dynamics in their everyday ‘felt’ security practices. Therefore, it offers a path for feminist IR and security studies to prioritize those whom anti-immigrant populism aims to silence in the age of populism.</p> 2024-10-23T13:05:23Z Text Online resource 10.17028/rd.lboro.27278133.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/online_resource/Transcripts_of_the_interviews_with_former_detainees/27278133 CC BY-NC 4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Human society race and crime/justice Immigration Europe Conflict Security Defence International Relations Policy and Administration Political Science Ali Bilgic Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees |
| title | Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees |
| title_full | Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees |
| title_fullStr | Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees |
| title_full_unstemmed | Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees |
| title_short | Transcripts of the interviews with former detainees |
| title_sort | transcripts of the interviews with former detainees |
| topic | Human society race and crime/justice Immigration Europe Conflict Security Defence International Relations Policy and Administration Political Science |
| url | https://dx.doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.27278133.v1 |