Loading…

Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures

The fault tree methodology is appropriate when the component level failures (basic events) occur independently. One situation where the conditions of independence are not met occurs when secondary failure events appear in the fault tree structure. Guidelines for fault tree construction that have bee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Dunnett, J.D. Andrews
Format: Default Article
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/3824
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1822546520541495296
author Sarah Dunnett
J.D. Andrews
author_facet Sarah Dunnett
J.D. Andrews
author_sort Sarah Dunnett (1251444)
collection Figshare
description The fault tree methodology is appropriate when the component level failures (basic events) occur independently. One situation where the conditions of independence are not met occurs when secondary failure events appear in the fault tree structure. Guidelines for fault tree construction that have been utilized for many years encourage the inclusion of secondary failures along with primary failures and command faults in the representation of the failure logic. The resulting fault tree is an accurate representation of the logic but may produce inaccurate quantitative results for the probability and frequency of system failure if methodologies are used that rely on independence. This paper illustrates how inaccurate these quantitative results can be. Alternative approaches are developed by which fault trees of this type of structure can be analysed.
format Default
Article
id rr-article-9226925
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2004
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-92269252004-01-01T00:00:00Z Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures Sarah Dunnett (1251444) J.D. Andrews (7120562) Other engineering not elsewhere classified Fault tree analysis Secondary failures Engineering not elsewhere classified The fault tree methodology is appropriate when the component level failures (basic events) occur independently. One situation where the conditions of independence are not met occurs when secondary failure events appear in the fault tree structure. Guidelines for fault tree construction that have been utilized for many years encourage the inclusion of secondary failures along with primary failures and command faults in the representation of the failure logic. The resulting fault tree is an accurate representation of the logic but may produce inaccurate quantitative results for the probability and frequency of system failure if methodologies are used that rely on independence. This paper illustrates how inaccurate these quantitative results can be. Alternative approaches are developed by which fault trees of this type of structure can be analysed. 2004-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/3824 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Analysis_methods_for_fault_trees_that_contain_secondary_failures/9226925 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Other engineering not elsewhere classified
Fault tree analysis
Secondary failures
Engineering not elsewhere classified
Sarah Dunnett
J.D. Andrews
Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures
title Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures
title_full Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures
title_fullStr Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures
title_full_unstemmed Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures
title_short Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures
title_sort analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures
topic Other engineering not elsewhere classified
Fault tree analysis
Secondary failures
Engineering not elsewhere classified
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/3824