Loading…

Intention in the editing of Shakespeare

Play scripts differ from prose narratives and poetry because they are meant to undergo a further transformation by practitioners before being consumed. Shakespeare’s plays come to us via early printed editions showing corrections, unwarranted adjustments, and fresh errors by copyists, compositors, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gabriel Egan
Format: Default Article
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/8901
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818175407073001472
author Gabriel Egan
author_facet Gabriel Egan
author_sort Gabriel Egan (7146041)
collection Figshare
description Play scripts differ from prose narratives and poetry because they are meant to undergo a further transformation by practitioners before being consumed. Shakespeare’s plays come to us via early printed editions showing corrections, unwarranted adjustments, and fresh errors by copyists, compositors, and pressmen. For one school of thought, Shakespeare’s intention all but disappears under these extra textual layers, and another school would have us consider the copyists, compositors, pressmen, and actors to be equal partners with Shakespeare in the creation of his works. Add to that collaborative authorship and multiple revision of scripts, and the temptations of postmodern insouciance about intention overwhelm all but the staunchest defender of the old certainties. Here it is argued that research into the material conditions that produced the early editions of Shakespeare shows that the recent rejection of New Bibliography (which embodies the most venerable of the old certainties) is mistaken and that intention remains a vital notion for editors.
format Default
Article
id rr-article-9331835
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2010
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-93318352010-01-01T00:00:00Z Intention in the editing of Shakespeare Gabriel Egan (7146041) Other creative arts and writing not elsewhere classified untagged Studies in the Creative Arts and Writing not elsewhere classified Play scripts differ from prose narratives and poetry because they are meant to undergo a further transformation by practitioners before being consumed. Shakespeare’s plays come to us via early printed editions showing corrections, unwarranted adjustments, and fresh errors by copyists, compositors, and pressmen. For one school of thought, Shakespeare’s intention all but disappears under these extra textual layers, and another school would have us consider the copyists, compositors, pressmen, and actors to be equal partners with Shakespeare in the creation of his works. Add to that collaborative authorship and multiple revision of scripts, and the temptations of postmodern insouciance about intention overwhelm all but the staunchest defender of the old certainties. Here it is argued that research into the material conditions that produced the early editions of Shakespeare shows that the recent rejection of New Bibliography (which embodies the most venerable of the old certainties) is mistaken and that intention remains a vital notion for editors. 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/8901 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Intention_in_the_editing_of_Shakespeare/9331835 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Other creative arts and writing not elsewhere classified
untagged
Studies in the Creative Arts and Writing not elsewhere classified
Gabriel Egan
Intention in the editing of Shakespeare
title Intention in the editing of Shakespeare
title_full Intention in the editing of Shakespeare
title_fullStr Intention in the editing of Shakespeare
title_full_unstemmed Intention in the editing of Shakespeare
title_short Intention in the editing of Shakespeare
title_sort intention in the editing of shakespeare
topic Other creative arts and writing not elsewhere classified
untagged
Studies in the Creative Arts and Writing not elsewhere classified
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/8901