Loading…
The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson
In this response we first show that Simpson’s proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Default Article |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/38179 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1818168194173501440 |
---|---|
author | Hugues Lortie-Forgues Matthew Inglis |
author_facet | Hugues Lortie-Forgues Matthew Inglis |
author_sort | Hugues Lortie-Forgues (7157774) |
collection | Figshare |
description | In this response we first show that Simpson’s proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by varying this choice |
format | Default Article |
id | rr-article-9367493 |
institution | Loughborough University |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | Figshare |
spelling | rr-article-93674932019-08-08T10:25:25Z The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson Hugues Lortie-Forgues (7157774) Matthew Inglis (1384290) Other education not elsewhere classified untagged In this response we first show that Simpson’s proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by varying this choice 2019-08-08T10:25:25Z Text Journal contribution 2134/38179 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_value_of_consensus_priors_A_response_to_Simpson/9367493 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
spellingShingle | Other education not elsewhere classified untagged Hugues Lortie-Forgues Matthew Inglis The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson |
title | The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson |
title_full | The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson |
title_fullStr | The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson |
title_short | The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson |
title_sort | value of consensus priors: a response to simpson |
topic | Other education not elsewhere classified untagged |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/38179 |