Loading…

The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson

In this response we first show that Simpson’s proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugues Lortie-Forgues, Matthew Inglis
Format: Default Article
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/38179
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818168194173501440
author Hugues Lortie-Forgues
Matthew Inglis
author_facet Hugues Lortie-Forgues
Matthew Inglis
author_sort Hugues Lortie-Forgues (7157774)
collection Figshare
description In this response we first show that Simpson’s proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by varying this choice
format Default
Article
id rr-article-9367493
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2019
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-93674932019-08-08T10:25:25Z The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson Hugues Lortie-Forgues (7157774) Matthew Inglis (1384290) Other education not elsewhere classified untagged In this response we first show that Simpson’s proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by varying this choice 2019-08-08T10:25:25Z Text Journal contribution 2134/38179 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_value_of_consensus_priors_A_response_to_Simpson/9367493 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Other education not elsewhere classified
untagged
Hugues Lortie-Forgues
Matthew Inglis
The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson
title The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson
title_full The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson
title_fullStr The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson
title_full_unstemmed The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson
title_short The value of consensus priors: A response to Simpson
title_sort value of consensus priors: a response to simpson
topic Other education not elsewhere classified
untagged
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/38179