Rigorous large-scale educational RCTs are often uninformative: Should we be concerned?

There are a growing number of large-scale educational Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Considering their expense, it is important to reflect on the effectiveness of this approach. We assessed the magnitude and precision of effects found in those large-scale RCTs commissioned by the EEF (UK) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugues Lortie-Forgues, Matthew Inglis
Format: Default Article
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Other education not elsewhere classified
educational policy
evaluation
meta-analysis
program evaluation
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/36789
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There are a growing number of large-scale educational Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Considering their expense, it is important to reflect on the effectiveness of this approach. We assessed the magnitude and precision of effects found in those large-scale RCTs commissioned by the EEF (UK) and the NCEE (US) which evaluated interventions aimed at improving academic achievement in K-12 (141 RCTs; 1,222,024 students). The mean effect size was 0.06 standard deviations (SDs). These sat within relatively large confidence intervals (mean width 0.30 SDs) which meant that the results were often uninformative (the median Bayes factor was 0.56). We argue that our field needs, as a priority, to understand why educational RCTs often find small and uninformative effects.

Similar Items