Loading…
Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems
The evolution of building facades towards increasingly smarter and more complex fenestration systems required an evolution in simulation capabilities too. While simulation software can reliably reproduce the system’s optical behaviour, the climate-based daylight evaluation of entire buildings needs...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Default Conference proceeding |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/24542 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1818171303242235904 |
|---|---|
| author | Eleonora Brembilla Doris A. Chi Pool Christina Hopfe John Mardaljevic |
| author_facet | Eleonora Brembilla Doris A. Chi Pool Christina Hopfe John Mardaljevic |
| author_sort | Eleonora Brembilla (7046720) |
| collection | Figshare |
| description | The evolution of building facades towards increasingly smarter and more complex fenestration systems required an evolution in simulation capabilities too. While simulation software can reliably reproduce the system’s optical behaviour, the climate-based daylight evaluation of entire buildings needs to efficiently combine accuracy and computation speed. Five state-of-the-art Climate-Based Daylight Modelling (CBDM) techniques to evaluate a space with fixed venetian blinds are compared with each others. Multiple options to apply these techniques are also considered. The use of annual metrics based on global illumination led to a good agreement between all methods, while evaluating only direct sunlight exposed some profound differences between simulation techniques. |
| format | Default Conference proceeding |
| id | rr-article-9436583 |
| institution | Loughborough University |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| record_format | Figshare |
| spelling | rr-article-94365832017-01-01T00:00:00Z Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems Eleonora Brembilla (7046720) Doris A. Chi Pool (7177229) Christina Hopfe (1257180) John Mardaljevic (1252824) Architectural science and technology Building science, technologies and systems Other built environment and design not elsewhere classified Environmental engineering not elsewhere classified untagged Built Environment and Design not elsewhere classified Building Science and Techniques Architectural Science and Technology (incl. Acoustics, Lighting, Structure and Ecologically Sustainable Design) Environmental Engineering Modelling The evolution of building facades towards increasingly smarter and more complex fenestration systems required an evolution in simulation capabilities too. While simulation software can reliably reproduce the system’s optical behaviour, the climate-based daylight evaluation of entire buildings needs to efficiently combine accuracy and computation speed. Five state-of-the-art Climate-Based Daylight Modelling (CBDM) techniques to evaluate a space with fixed venetian blinds are compared with each others. Multiple options to apply these techniques are also considered. The use of annual metrics based on global illumination led to a good agreement between all methods, while evaluating only direct sunlight exposed some profound differences between simulation techniques. 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Conference contribution 2134/24542 https://figshare.com/articles/conference_contribution/Inter-model_comparison_of_five_climate-based_daylight_modelling_techniques_redirecting_glazing_shading_systems/9436583 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Architectural science and technology Building science, technologies and systems Other built environment and design not elsewhere classified Environmental engineering not elsewhere classified untagged Built Environment and Design not elsewhere classified Building Science and Techniques Architectural Science and Technology (incl. Acoustics, Lighting, Structure and Ecologically Sustainable Design) Environmental Engineering Modelling Eleonora Brembilla Doris A. Chi Pool Christina Hopfe John Mardaljevic Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems |
| title | Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems |
| title_full | Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems |
| title_fullStr | Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems |
| title_full_unstemmed | Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems |
| title_short | Inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems |
| title_sort | inter-model comparison of five climate-based daylight modelling techniques: redirecting glazing/shading systems |
| topic | Architectural science and technology Building science, technologies and systems Other built environment and design not elsewhere classified Environmental engineering not elsewhere classified untagged Built Environment and Design not elsewhere classified Building Science and Techniques Architectural Science and Technology (incl. Acoustics, Lighting, Structure and Ecologically Sustainable Design) Environmental Engineering Modelling |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/24542 |