Loading…

The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis

This study analysed the reporting of the debate over the Guggenheim Bilbao in the Basque nationalist newspapers Egin and Diario Vasco. I was looking at differences/similarities between the newspapers, and at how argumentation changed over time (1997/1998), drawing upon content analysis, discourse an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Angel B. Durandegui
Format: Default Thesis
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/10697
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818174388489420800
author Angel B. Durandegui
author_facet Angel B. Durandegui
author_sort Angel B. Durandegui (7190081)
collection Figshare
description This study analysed the reporting of the debate over the Guggenheim Bilbao in the Basque nationalist newspapers Egin and Diario Vasco. I was looking at differences/similarities between the newspapers, and at how argumentation changed over time (1997/1998), drawing upon content analysis, discourse analysis of the ideological themes in the reporting and an indepth analysis of two editorials, one in Spanish and one in Basque. The content analysis confirmed that economy and Basque culture/identity were highly controversial themes; and that in 1998 the museum became more accepted. An analysis of rhetorical strategies e.g. quantification rhetoric for economic predictions; vagueness/evasiveness to portray the Basques' reception of modem architecture/art, permitted the examination of intragroup/intergroup models of interaction, strategies and underlying ideological dilemmas (Billig et ai, 1988). After the inauguration, Diario Vasco claimed that the museum was concerned with Basque modem art, while Egin maintained a cautious distance. The in-depth comparative analysis of political rhetoric in two Egin's editorials, reporting similar events in Basque or Spanish, confirmed that the use of these different languages involves different construction of the readership; and different strategies to convey communality between writer/reader. In the Basque language editorial, communality was cautiously constructed until an assertive we Basques stressed search of unity, differentiation, and sovereignty: conflict/differences between Basques were omitted, backgrounded or ironized, while differences with the Spanish foregrounded. In the Spanish editorial, an impersonal third person tone avoided using the rhetoric of we. Specific Basques were blamed for the repression of Basque secessionism. A dramatic tone suggested subtle criticism against ETA, yet implying that it was reasonable to include ETA among the human victims. The explicit nation state's deixis in the Spanish editorial implied Spain was the nation state. In the Basque context the nation state's deixis was ambiguous: we Basques might be used to address Basques beyond French-Spanish boundaries, suggesting a long-term representation/project that imagined Basqueness beyond its present-day administrative division or actual political influence. The implications of such fine detail differences were discussed.
format Default
Thesis
id rr-article-9480410
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2007
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-94804102007-01-01T00:00:00Z The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis Angel B. Durandegui (7190081) Other human society not elsewhere classified Other language, communication and culture not elsewhere classified Guggenheim Bilbao Museum Ideological discourse analysis Political rhetoric Ideological dilemmas Basque language Basque nationalist press Artistic/cultural policymaking Basque history Language, Communication and Culture not elsewhere classified Studies in Human Society not elsewhere classified This study analysed the reporting of the debate over the Guggenheim Bilbao in the Basque nationalist newspapers Egin and Diario Vasco. I was looking at differences/similarities between the newspapers, and at how argumentation changed over time (1997/1998), drawing upon content analysis, discourse analysis of the ideological themes in the reporting and an indepth analysis of two editorials, one in Spanish and one in Basque. The content analysis confirmed that economy and Basque culture/identity were highly controversial themes; and that in 1998 the museum became more accepted. An analysis of rhetorical strategies e.g. quantification rhetoric for economic predictions; vagueness/evasiveness to portray the Basques' reception of modem architecture/art, permitted the examination of intragroup/intergroup models of interaction, strategies and underlying ideological dilemmas (Billig et ai, 1988). After the inauguration, Diario Vasco claimed that the museum was concerned with Basque modem art, while Egin maintained a cautious distance. The in-depth comparative analysis of political rhetoric in two Egin's editorials, reporting similar events in Basque or Spanish, confirmed that the use of these different languages involves different construction of the readership; and different strategies to convey communality between writer/reader. In the Basque language editorial, communality was cautiously constructed until an assertive we Basques stressed search of unity, differentiation, and sovereignty: conflict/differences between Basques were omitted, backgrounded or ironized, while differences with the Spanish foregrounded. In the Spanish editorial, an impersonal third person tone avoided using the rhetoric of we. Specific Basques were blamed for the repression of Basque secessionism. A dramatic tone suggested subtle criticism against ETA, yet implying that it was reasonable to include ETA among the human victims. The explicit nation state's deixis in the Spanish editorial implied Spain was the nation state. In the Basque context the nation state's deixis was ambiguous: we Basques might be used to address Basques beyond French-Spanish boundaries, suggesting a long-term representation/project that imagined Basqueness beyond its present-day administrative division or actual political influence. The implications of such fine detail differences were discussed. 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Thesis 2134/10697 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/The_Guggenheim_Bilbao_Museum_in_the_Basque_nationalist_press_discursive_and_rhetorical_analysis/9480410 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Other human society not elsewhere classified
Other language, communication and culture not elsewhere classified
Guggenheim Bilbao Museum
Ideological discourse analysis
Political rhetoric
Ideological dilemmas
Basque language
Basque nationalist press
Artistic/cultural policymaking
Basque history
Language, Communication and Culture not elsewhere classified
Studies in Human Society not elsewhere classified
Angel B. Durandegui
The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis
title The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis
title_full The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis
title_fullStr The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis
title_short The Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the Basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis
title_sort guggenheim bilbao museum in the basque nationalist press: discursive and rhetorical analysis
topic Other human society not elsewhere classified
Other language, communication and culture not elsewhere classified
Guggenheim Bilbao Museum
Ideological discourse analysis
Political rhetoric
Ideological dilemmas
Basque language
Basque nationalist press
Artistic/cultural policymaking
Basque history
Language, Communication and Culture not elsewhere classified
Studies in Human Society not elsewhere classified
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/10697