Loading…
In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledg...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Default Article |
Published: |
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/16125 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1818173220515217408 |
---|---|
author | Marco Antonsich |
author_facet | Marco Antonsich |
author_sort | Marco Antonsich (1251417) |
collection | Figshare |
description | The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledge acquired "in place" versus "at distance" as well as on more specific differences in perspective (e.g., use of sources, terminology, critical geopolitcs). Copyright © 2006 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved. |
format | Default Article |
id | rr-article-9483857 |
institution | Loughborough University |
publishDate | 2006 |
record_format | Figshare |
spelling | rr-article-94838572006-01-01T00:00:00Z In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle Marco Antonsich (1251417) Other earth sciences not elsewhere classified Finland Geopolitical remote sensing Critical geopolitics National identity Cultural turn Identity politics Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledge acquired "in place" versus "at distance" as well as on more specific differences in perspective (e.g., use of sources, terminology, critical geopolitcs). Copyright © 2006 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved. 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/16125 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/In_defense_of_geopolitical_remote_sensing_reply_to_Moisio_and_Harle/9483857 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
spellingShingle | Other earth sciences not elsewhere classified Finland Geopolitical remote sensing Critical geopolitics National identity Cultural turn Identity politics Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified Marco Antonsich In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle |
title | In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle |
title_full | In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle |
title_fullStr | In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle |
title_full_unstemmed | In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle |
title_short | In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle |
title_sort | in defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to moisio and harle |
topic | Other earth sciences not elsewhere classified Finland Geopolitical remote sensing Critical geopolitics National identity Cultural turn Identity politics Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/2134/16125 |