Loading…

In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle

The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marco Antonsich
Format: Default Article
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/16125
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818173220515217408
author Marco Antonsich
author_facet Marco Antonsich
author_sort Marco Antonsich (1251417)
collection Figshare
description The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledge acquired "in place" versus "at distance" as well as on more specific differences in perspective (e.g., use of sources, terminology, critical geopolitcs). Copyright © 2006 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved.
format Default
Article
id rr-article-9483857
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2006
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-94838572006-01-01T00:00:00Z In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle Marco Antonsich (1251417) Other earth sciences not elsewhere classified Finland Geopolitical remote sensing Critical geopolitics National identity Cultural turn Identity politics Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledge acquired "in place" versus "at distance" as well as on more specific differences in perspective (e.g., use of sources, terminology, critical geopolitcs). Copyright © 2006 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved. 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Journal contribution 2134/16125 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/In_defense_of_geopolitical_remote_sensing_reply_to_Moisio_and_Harle/9483857 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Other earth sciences not elsewhere classified
Finland
Geopolitical remote sensing
Critical geopolitics
National identity
Cultural turn
Identity politics
Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified
Marco Antonsich
In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
title In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
title_full In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
title_fullStr In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
title_full_unstemmed In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
title_short In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
title_sort in defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to moisio and harle
topic Other earth sciences not elsewhere classified
Finland
Geopolitical remote sensing
Critical geopolitics
National identity
Cultural turn
Identity politics
Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/16125