Loading…

The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits

We investigate the conceptual underpinnings of the developing social benefits standard from the consultation paper in 2015 to the exposure draft ED63 in 2017. The purpose of the paper is to assess the conceptual foundations in the IPSASB framework and the links with other financial reporting regimes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rhoda Brown, S. Ellwood, A. Conrath-Hargreaves
Format: Default Conference proceeding
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2134/34308
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1818169528253677568
author Rhoda Brown
S. Ellwood
A. Conrath-Hargreaves
author_facet Rhoda Brown
S. Ellwood
A. Conrath-Hargreaves
author_sort Rhoda Brown (1249215)
collection Figshare
description We investigate the conceptual underpinnings of the developing social benefits standard from the consultation paper in 2015 to the exposure draft ED63 in 2017. The purpose of the paper is to assess the conceptual foundations in the IPSASB framework and the links with other financial reporting regimes (International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and National Accounts or Government Financial Statistics (GFS) on the development of international public sector accounting standards (IPSAS). We use documentary analysis of IPSASB papers together with a content study of comment letters on the Consultation Paper. Latent content analysis is deepened by detailed exposition of accounting issues using extracts from the IPSASB documents and comment letters. The 2015 Consultation Paper put forward propositions in apparent accordance with the IPSASB framework and GFS, but respondents to the consultation paper were unconvinced of some arguments of adherence to the framework and were unsure how social benefits could be classified on the basis of obligations and largely felt an insurance approach was inappropriate. The alignment with GFS also proved unsatisfactory and is reduced in ED63. This study raises concerns regarding the coherence of the IPSASB framework as a conceptual underpinning for public sector accounting standards and questions the alignment of public sector accounting to other regimes with different users and objectives.
format Default
Conference proceeding
id rr-article-9499898
institution Loughborough University
publishDate 2018
record_format Figshare
spelling rr-article-94998982018-01-01T00:00:00Z The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits Rhoda Brown (1249215) S. Ellwood (7198409) A. Conrath-Hargreaves (7198412) Other commerce, management, tourism and services not elsewhere classified IPSAS Conceptual framework Social benefits Government obligations Business and Management not elsewhere classified We investigate the conceptual underpinnings of the developing social benefits standard from the consultation paper in 2015 to the exposure draft ED63 in 2017. The purpose of the paper is to assess the conceptual foundations in the IPSASB framework and the links with other financial reporting regimes (International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and National Accounts or Government Financial Statistics (GFS) on the development of international public sector accounting standards (IPSAS). We use documentary analysis of IPSASB papers together with a content study of comment letters on the Consultation Paper. Latent content analysis is deepened by detailed exposition of accounting issues using extracts from the IPSASB documents and comment letters. The 2015 Consultation Paper put forward propositions in apparent accordance with the IPSASB framework and GFS, but respondents to the consultation paper were unconvinced of some arguments of adherence to the framework and were unsure how social benefits could be classified on the basis of obligations and largely felt an insurance approach was inappropriate. The alignment with GFS also proved unsatisfactory and is reduced in ED63. This study raises concerns regarding the coherence of the IPSASB framework as a conceptual underpinning for public sector accounting standards and questions the alignment of public sector accounting to other regimes with different users and objectives. 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Text Conference contribution 2134/34308 https://figshare.com/articles/conference_contribution/The_conceptual_underpinnings_of_recent_advances_in_international_public_sector_accounting_standards_Developing_a_standard_for_social_benefits/9499898 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
spellingShingle Other commerce, management, tourism and services not elsewhere classified
IPSAS
Conceptual framework
Social benefits
Government obligations
Business and Management not elsewhere classified
Rhoda Brown
S. Ellwood
A. Conrath-Hargreaves
The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits
title The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits
title_full The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits
title_fullStr The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits
title_full_unstemmed The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits
title_short The conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: Developing a standard for social benefits
title_sort conceptual underpinnings of recent advances in international public sector accounting standards: developing a standard for social benefits
topic Other commerce, management, tourism and services not elsewhere classified
IPSAS
Conceptual framework
Social benefits
Government obligations
Business and Management not elsewhere classified
url https://hdl.handle.net/2134/34308