Search Results - AKAIKE, T.~
-
1
Forecasting indoor temperatures during heatwaves: Do more complex models provide better predictions?
Published 2021“…GAM models were compared to AutoRegressive models with eXogenous inputs (ARX) and validated against monitored data from two case study dwellings, located near to Loughborough in the UK, during the 2013 heatwave. …”
Get full text
Default Conference proceeding -
2
Prediction of internal temperatures during hot summer conditions with time series forecasting models
Published 2018“…The hourly results for the analysed dwellings showed a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) below 0.63°C and 0.49°C for the two case study dwellings across the 3-day forecasting period, during the 2015 heatwave. …”
Get full text
Default Conference proceeding -
3
Trajectory clustering aided personalized driver intention prediction for intelligent vehicles
Published 2018“…The proposed system is validated by a realworld driving dataset. Comparative experimental results indicate that PRM clustering can discover more in-depth driving behaviours than manually defined manoeuvres due to its fine ability in accounting for both spatial and temporal information; the proposed framework integrating PRM clustering and CART classification provides promising intention prediction performance and is adaptive to different drivers.…”
Get full text
Default Article -
4
Can semi-parametric additive models outperform linear models, when forecasting indoor temperatures in free-running buildings?
Published 2019“…GAM models were compared to AutoRegressive models with eXogenous inputs (ARX) and validated against monitored data from two case study dwellings, located near to Loughborough in the UK, during the 2013 heatwave. …”
Get full text
Default Article -
5
Forecasting indoor temperatures during heatwaves using time series models
Published 2018“…The model proved capable of performing multi-step-ahead predictions during extreme heat events with an acceptable accuracy for periods up to 72 h, with hourly results achieving a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) below 0.7 °C for every forecast. …”
Get full text
Default Article -
6
Comparing efficacy of different climate indices for predicting labor loss, body temperature, and thermal perception in a wide variety of warm and hot climates
Published 2024“…Integrating data from earlier studies, data from 982 exposures (75 conditions) exercising at a fixed cardiovascular load of 130b.min-1, in varying temperatures (15-50°C), humidities (20-80%), solar radiation (0-800W.m-2), wind (0.2-3.5m.s-1) and two clothing levels, were used to model the predictive power of ambient temperature, Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI), Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), Modified Equivalent Temperature (mPET), Heat Index, Apparent Temperature (AT), and Wet Bulb Temperature ( Twb) for the calculation of PWC-loss, skin temperature ( Tskin) and core-to-skin temperature gradient, and Thermal perception( TSV) in the heat. …”
Get full text
Default Article -
7
Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periods
Published 2016“…When assessing model predictive skill under climate change conditions we recommend (i) setting up DSST to select the best available analogues of expected annual mean and seasonal climate conditions; (ii) applying multiple performance criteria; (iii) testing transferability using a diverse set of catchments; and (iv) using a multimodel ensemble in conjunction with an appropriate averaging technique. …”
Get full text
Default Article -
8
Genetic scores of ENOS, ACE and VEGFA genes are predictive of endothelial dysfunction associated osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
Published 2021“…Bearers of CTAAAT (OR 2.43, p = 0.007), ACDG (OR 2.50, p = 0.002) and GATA (OR 2.10, p = 0.009) had substantial impact for osteoporosis after correcting the effects with traditional risk factors (TRD).With uncertainty measure (R2h) and Akaike information criterion (AIC), best fit models showed that CTAAAT manifested in multiplicative mode (β ± SE: 2.19 ± 0.86, p < 0.001), whereas ACDG (β ± SE: 1.73 ± 0.54, p = 0.001) and GATA (β ± SE: 3.07 ± 0.81, p < 0.001) expressed in dominant modes. …”
Get full text
Default Article -
9
DATASETS HEATSHIELD project Loughborough University, averaged per condition and individual sessions, and files showing the statistical analyses.
Published 2024“…Integrating data from earlier studies, data from 982 exposures (75 conditions) exercising at a fixed cardiovascular load of 130b.min-1, in varying temperatures (15-50°C), humidities (20-80%), solar radiation (0-800W.m-2), wind (0.2-3.5m.s-1) and two clothing levels, were used to model the predictive power of ambient temperature, Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI), Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), Modified Equivalent Temperature (mPET), Heat Index, Apparent Temperature (AT), and Wet Bulb Temperature (Twb) for the calculation of PWC-loss, skin temperature (Tskin) and core-to-skin temperature gradient, and Thermal perception( TSV) in the heat. …”
Get full text
Data Data