Loading…

The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases

The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and Ame...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of forensic sciences 1994-03, Vol.39 (2), p.319-352
Main Authors: Budowle, B, Monson, KL, Giusti, AM, Brown, BL
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3
container_end_page 352
container_issue 2
container_start_page 319
container_title Journal of forensic sciences
container_volume 39
creator Budowle, B
Monson, KL
Giusti, AM
Brown, BL
description The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile.
doi_str_mv 10.1520/JFS13605J
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_astm_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_astm_journals_10_1520_JFS13605J</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26551097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkOp6FZ74Q8QQoWCF1NzJh-TXC7q6oq0oqu3IWZO7MjOzJrMXuivN-KiYu1V4PDkyXvyErIN7BfIku2fTi6BKyZPv5ARSKkKwUrzlYwYK8sCwOgN8i2lO8aYAgXrZL0ywLQQI3I7-4t0nBKm1GI30D7QScT7JXb-gR6loWndgOl5fOKQTqfT4hg7jHlY0-vfswt6HvvQzDPSdPTaxaZfJnqBAWM2ID10g7tx2b5F1oKbJ_y-OjfJ1eRodnBSnP05nh6MzwonQAyFNMKXzgdVs6C1VN4bYYxXlVC6VqiDdkFI7mQAV3mnSqcq4KKquMRQm5pvkp8v3kXs8xZpsG2TPM7nrsMczVZKAjBjMvjjA3jXL2OXs9kSjNKSg8zQ7v8g4EwrwbRmmdp7oXzsU4oY7CLmf4sPFph97se-9pPZnZVxedNi_UquCnnL79LQvnvtE1H1GZgBy40t7WOz-PeWXdSBPwGIAaYn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308640880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</title><source>American Society for Testing and Materials: ASTM Journals</source><creator>Budowle, B ; Monson, KL ; Giusti, AM ; Brown, BL</creator><creatorcontrib>Budowle, B ; Monson, KL ; Giusti, AM ; Brown, BL</creatorcontrib><description>The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1520/JFS13605J</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7910844</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Callaghan and Co</publisher><subject>Bias ; Confidence Intervals ; Databases, Factual ; Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific ; DNA Fingerprinting ; Ethnic Groups - genetics ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Forensic Medicine ; Gene Frequency ; Humans ; Likelihood Functions ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Reference Values ; Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid ; Reproducibility of Results ; Residence Characteristics ; Restriction Mapping ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 1994-03, Vol.39 (2), p.319-352</ispartof><rights>All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of the publisher.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Testing and Materials Mar 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,9791,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7910844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budowle, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giusti, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, BL</creatorcontrib><title>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific</subject><subject>DNA Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups - genetics</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine</subject><subject>Gene Frequency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Restriction Mapping</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkOp6FZ74Q8QQoWCF1NzJh-TXC7q6oq0oqu3IWZO7MjOzJrMXuivN-KiYu1V4PDkyXvyErIN7BfIku2fTi6BKyZPv5ARSKkKwUrzlYwYK8sCwOgN8i2lO8aYAgXrZL0ywLQQI3I7-4t0nBKm1GI30D7QScT7JXb-gR6loWndgOl5fOKQTqfT4hg7jHlY0-vfswt6HvvQzDPSdPTaxaZfJnqBAWM2ID10g7tx2b5F1oKbJ_y-OjfJ1eRodnBSnP05nh6MzwonQAyFNMKXzgdVs6C1VN4bYYxXlVC6VqiDdkFI7mQAV3mnSqcq4KKquMRQm5pvkp8v3kXs8xZpsG2TPM7nrsMczVZKAjBjMvjjA3jXL2OXs9kSjNKSg8zQ7v8g4EwrwbRmmdp7oXzsU4oY7CLmf4sPFph97se-9pPZnZVxedNi_UquCnnL79LQvnvtE1H1GZgBy40t7WOz-PeWXdSBPwGIAaYn</recordid><startdate>19940301</startdate><enddate>19940301</enddate><creator>Budowle, B</creator><creator>Monson, KL</creator><creator>Giusti, AM</creator><creator>Brown, BL</creator><general>Callaghan and Co</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940301</creationdate><title>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</title><author>Budowle, B ; Monson, KL ; Giusti, AM ; Brown, BL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific</topic><topic>DNA Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups - genetics</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine</topic><topic>Gene Frequency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Restriction Mapping</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budowle, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giusti, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, BL</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budowle, B</au><au>Monson, KL</au><au>Giusti, AM</au><au>Brown, BL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>1994-03-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>319-352</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><coden>JFSCAS</coden><abstract>The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Callaghan and Co</pub><pmid>7910844</pmid><doi>10.1520/JFS13605J</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1198
ispartof Journal of forensic sciences, 1994-03, Vol.39 (2), p.319-352
issn 0022-1198
1556-4029
language eng
recordid cdi_astm_journals_10_1520_JFS13605J
source American Society for Testing and Materials: ASTM Journals
subjects Bias
Confidence Intervals
Databases, Factual
Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific
DNA Fingerprinting
Ethnic Groups - genetics
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Forensic Medicine
Gene Frequency
Humans
Likelihood Functions
Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
Reference Values
Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
Reproducibility of Results
Residence Characteristics
Restriction Mapping
United States
title The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A30%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_astm_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Assessment%20of%20Frequency%20Estimates%20of%20Hae%20III-Generated%20VNTR%20Profiles%20in%20Various%20Reference%20Databases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Budowle,%20B&rft.date=1994-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=319-352&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft.coden=JFSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1520/JFS13605J&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_astm_%3E26551097%3C/proquest_astm_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308640880&rft_id=info:pmid/7910844&rfr_iscdi=true