Loading…
The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases
The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and Ame...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of forensic sciences 1994-03, Vol.39 (2), p.319-352 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3 |
container_end_page | 352 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | Journal of forensic sciences |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Budowle, B Monson, KL Giusti, AM Brown, BL |
description | The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1520/JFS13605J |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_astm_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_astm_journals_10_1520_JFS13605J</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26551097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkOp6FZ74Q8QQoWCF1NzJh-TXC7q6oq0oqu3IWZO7MjOzJrMXuivN-KiYu1V4PDkyXvyErIN7BfIku2fTi6BKyZPv5ARSKkKwUrzlYwYK8sCwOgN8i2lO8aYAgXrZL0ywLQQI3I7-4t0nBKm1GI30D7QScT7JXb-gR6loWndgOl5fOKQTqfT4hg7jHlY0-vfswt6HvvQzDPSdPTaxaZfJnqBAWM2ID10g7tx2b5F1oKbJ_y-OjfJ1eRodnBSnP05nh6MzwonQAyFNMKXzgdVs6C1VN4bYYxXlVC6VqiDdkFI7mQAV3mnSqcq4KKquMRQm5pvkp8v3kXs8xZpsG2TPM7nrsMczVZKAjBjMvjjA3jXL2OXs9kSjNKSg8zQ7v8g4EwrwbRmmdp7oXzsU4oY7CLmf4sPFph97se-9pPZnZVxedNi_UquCnnL79LQvnvtE1H1GZgBy40t7WOz-PeWXdSBPwGIAaYn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308640880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</title><source>American Society for Testing and Materials: ASTM Journals</source><creator>Budowle, B ; Monson, KL ; Giusti, AM ; Brown, BL</creator><creatorcontrib>Budowle, B ; Monson, KL ; Giusti, AM ; Brown, BL</creatorcontrib><description>The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1520/JFS13605J</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7910844</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Callaghan and Co</publisher><subject>Bias ; Confidence Intervals ; Databases, Factual ; Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific ; DNA Fingerprinting ; Ethnic Groups - genetics ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Forensic Medicine ; Gene Frequency ; Humans ; Likelihood Functions ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Reference Values ; Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid ; Reproducibility of Results ; Residence Characteristics ; Restriction Mapping ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 1994-03, Vol.39 (2), p.319-352</ispartof><rights>All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of the publisher.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Testing and Materials Mar 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,9791,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7910844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budowle, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giusti, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, BL</creatorcontrib><title>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific</subject><subject>DNA Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups - genetics</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine</subject><subject>Gene Frequency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Restriction Mapping</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkOp6FZ74Q8QQoWCF1NzJh-TXC7q6oq0oqu3IWZO7MjOzJrMXuivN-KiYu1V4PDkyXvyErIN7BfIku2fTi6BKyZPv5ARSKkKwUrzlYwYK8sCwOgN8i2lO8aYAgXrZL0ywLQQI3I7-4t0nBKm1GI30D7QScT7JXb-gR6loWndgOl5fOKQTqfT4hg7jHlY0-vfswt6HvvQzDPSdPTaxaZfJnqBAWM2ID10g7tx2b5F1oKbJ_y-OjfJ1eRodnBSnP05nh6MzwonQAyFNMKXzgdVs6C1VN4bYYxXlVC6VqiDdkFI7mQAV3mnSqcq4KKquMRQm5pvkp8v3kXs8xZpsG2TPM7nrsMczVZKAjBjMvjjA3jXL2OXs9kSjNKSg8zQ7v8g4EwrwbRmmdp7oXzsU4oY7CLmf4sPFph97se-9pPZnZVxedNi_UquCnnL79LQvnvtE1H1GZgBy40t7WOz-PeWXdSBPwGIAaYn</recordid><startdate>19940301</startdate><enddate>19940301</enddate><creator>Budowle, B</creator><creator>Monson, KL</creator><creator>Giusti, AM</creator><creator>Brown, BL</creator><general>Callaghan and Co</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940301</creationdate><title>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</title><author>Budowle, B ; Monson, KL ; Giusti, AM ; Brown, BL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific</topic><topic>DNA Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups - genetics</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine</topic><topic>Gene Frequency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Restriction Mapping</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budowle, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giusti, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, BL</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budowle, B</au><au>Monson, KL</au><au>Giusti, AM</au><au>Brown, BL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>1994-03-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>319-352</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><coden>JFSCAS</coden><abstract>The likelihood of occurrence of 1964 Hae III-generated target DNA profiles was estimated using fixed bin frequencies from various regional and ethnic databases and the multiplication rule. The databases generally were from the following major categories: Black, Caucasian, Hispanic, Oriental, and American Indian. It was found that subdivision, either by ethnic group or by U.S. geographic region, within a major population group did not substantially affect forensic estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile. As expected, the greatest variation in estimates for within-group estimates was among American Indian databases. Because the greatest variation in statistical estimates occurs across-major population groups, in most cases, there will be no unfair bias applying general population database estimates. Therefore, based on empirical data, there is no demonstrable need for using alternate approaches, such as the ceiling approach, to derive statistical estimates. The current practice of using general population databases and the multiplication rule provides valid estimates of the likelihood of occurrence of a DNA profile.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Callaghan and Co</pub><pmid>7910844</pmid><doi>10.1520/JFS13605J</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1198 |
ispartof | Journal of forensic sciences, 1994-03, Vol.39 (2), p.319-352 |
issn | 0022-1198 1556-4029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_astm_journals_10_1520_JFS13605J |
source | American Society for Testing and Materials: ASTM Journals |
subjects | Bias Confidence Intervals Databases, Factual Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific DNA Fingerprinting Ethnic Groups - genetics Evaluation Studies as Topic Forensic Medicine Gene Frequency Humans Likelihood Functions Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length Reference Values Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid Reproducibility of Results Residence Characteristics Restriction Mapping United States |
title | The Assessment of Frequency Estimates of Hae III-Generated VNTR Profiles in Various Reference Databases |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A30%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_astm_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Assessment%20of%20Frequency%20Estimates%20of%20Hae%20III-Generated%20VNTR%20Profiles%20in%20Various%20Reference%20Databases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Budowle,%20B&rft.date=1994-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=319-352&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft.coden=JFSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1520/JFS13605J&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_astm_%3E26551097%3C/proquest_astm_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-594c2acf6d0f8856cc9499c67468d6e8f8af453a5f1a7ca62a671347735efd9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308640880&rft_id=info:pmid/7910844&rfr_iscdi=true |