Direct and indirect effects of landscape structure on a tri-trophic system within agricultural lands

• Published in: Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2012-11, Vol.3 (11), p.art94-19
• Main Authors: Daoust, Simon P, Bélisle, Marc, Savage, Jade, Robillard, Audrey, Baeta, Renaud, Brodeur, Jacques
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: agricultural intensification; Agriculture; Animal behavior; Biodiversity; Ecology; Environmental degradation; Farms; Forests; functional spatial scale; Habitat changes; Habitats; Landscape; landscape structure; Nasonia; Parasitism; Pasture; Pesticides; Protocalliphora; Soybeans; Species diversity; Studies; Tree Swallow; tri-trophic interactions; Trophic levels; Trophic relationships
• ISSN: 2150-8925; 2150-8925
• DOI: 10.1890/ES12-00300.1

Although several studies have examined the influence of landscape structure and agricultural intensification on species abundance and diversity, few have addressed how these impact populations across multiple trophic levels. We investigated the effects of landscape structure on the tri-trophic interactions between a bird host (the Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor (Vieillot)), its blowfly ectoparasites ( Protocalliphora Hough), and their parasitoid wasps ( Nasonia Ashmead) across 13 spatial scales, along a gradient of agricultural intensification covering 10,200 km 2 in southern Québec, Canada. We showed that the three taxa responded to landscape structure at distinctive spatial scales that are relative to their size rather than their trophic rank. This response, however, differed according to habitat type. The three organisms responded to the amount of intensive cultures (maize, soybean and other cereals) at smaller spatial scales than to the amount of extensive cultures (hayfields and pastures). Although the number of Tree Swallow fledglings, the number of Protocalliphora sialia Shannon & Dobroscky pupae and the number of P. sialia pupae parasitized by Nasonia sp. per nest were negatively affected by agricultural intensification, our data do not support the prediction that organisms at the higher trophic levels are more susceptible to habitat degradation. Here, ectoparasites at the second trophic level were disproportionally affected by agricultural intensification; the abundance of P. sialia decreased by 80% along the gradient of agricultural intensification compared to a 20% and 35% reduction in the number of Tree Swallow fledglings and in the level of parasitism by Nasonia sp., respectively. Our work highlights the importance of designing protocols that take spatial aspects of trophic interactions into account when studying the impact of habitat loss and fragmentation on populations and communities, as these interactions dictate local biodiversity and community function. Furthermore, our results highlight the importance of considering multiple landscape parameters when identifying the functional spatial scales of an organism, as a failure to do so could lead to an underestimation of the area it uses.