Loading…
Myasthenia Gravis : en retrospektiv journalstudie ved Ullevål universitetssykehus i 2005
Myasthenia Gravis: a retrospective study of case records at Ullevål University Hospital in 2005 Medical student Hilde Teigen Andås Medical student Tahira R. Ahmad Guidance by Chantal ME Tallaksen Department of Neurology, UUH Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neurological disease cau...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertation |
Language: | Norwegian |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Myasthenia Gravis: a retrospective study of case records at Ullevål University Hospital in 2005
Medical student Hilde Teigen Andås
Medical student Tahira R. Ahmad
Guidance by Chantal ME Tallaksen
Department of Neurology, UUH
Background
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neurological disease caused by a disturbance in the neuromuscular transmission. The most frequent type is associated with the presence of antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) in the neuromuscular junction (80-85% of the cases). The world prevalence of MG is estimated to be between 8-15/100 000.
Objectives and hypothesis
Our main objectives were to establish the prevalence of myasthenia gravis at Ullevål University Hospital in August 2005, and to examine how various factors influence the course of the disease;
> age at onset
> severity at onset
> antibodies
> treatment
We also wanted to confirm in our hospital population that
1. MG most frequently affects fertile women
2. The older group of patients have a more severe illness
3. Elders have better effect of treatment
Design
A study of case records.
Data and methodology
Myasthenia gravis is diagnosed in the hospital at the department of neurology. This implies that all patients with MG at some time have been examined at a hospital. We searched the hospital’s archives for MG patients the last 15 years using the ICD-10 and ICD-9 criteria’s. We found a total of 150 patients. After examining the case records we could include 80 patients who were still alive and had a verified MG in our study. We divided our patient material in two groups, group I with disease onset under 50 years, group II with disease onset after 50 years.
It is important to be aware that our data might be insufficient because of faulty case records. The data was registered in Microsoft Excel and made anonymous. The statistical analysis was preformed using SSPS.
Results
There are twice as many women than men in our material. In group I (56% of the patients) 32% were men and 67% were women. Men had a milder condition, but there wasn’t a clear difference between the women.
81% of the patients had documented elevated AChR antibodies. There was no significant difference in respect of antibodies between group 1 and 2.
60% of the patients were thymectomized, with no difference between men and women.
All men and 80% of the women in group 1 were thymectomized, compared to 20% and 31% in group 2.
Discussion
The prevalence of MG in our population at August 1st 2005 was 10. |
---|