Loading…

Performance of Candidate Serum Biomarkers for Systemic Sclerosis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) runs a highly variable course, and prediction tools are highly desired. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic performance of 4 candidate serum biomarkers for SSc‐associated ILD. Methods Serum samples fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2019-06, Vol.71 (6), p.972-982
Main Authors: Elhai, Muriel, Hoffmann‐Vold, Anna Maria, Avouac, Jérôme, Pezet, Sonia, Cauvet, Anne, Leblond, Agathe, Fretheim, Håvard, Garen, Torhild, Kuwana, Masataka, Molberg, Øyvind, Allanore, Yannick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) runs a highly variable course, and prediction tools are highly desired. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic performance of 4 candidate serum biomarkers for SSc‐associated ILD. Methods Serum samples from a combined cohort of SSc patients (from Paris, France and Oslo, Norway; n = 427) were analyzed by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for concentrations of lung epithelial–derived surfactant protein D (SP‐D), Krebs von den Lungen 6 glycoprotein (KL‐6), CCL18, and OX40 ligand (OX40L). Lung fibrosis was measured by high‐resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests. Associations of these candidate biomarkers with baseline disease involvement and prediction of disease progression over time (mean ± SD follow‐up 3.2 ± 4.4 years) were investigated. Results In SSc patients at baseline, serum levels of KL‐6 correlated with the forced vital capacity (FVC) (r = −0.317, P < 0.001), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (r = −0.335, P < 0.001), and extent of lung fibrosis (r = 0.551, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, serum levels of KL‐6 and SP‐D, but not CCL18 and OX40L, were associated with lung fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.41, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.43–4.07 [P = 0.001] and OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.81–5.48 [P < 0.001], respectively). In SSc patients with ILD at baseline, longitudinal, multivariate analyses showed that CCL18 serum levels were an independent predictor of a >10% decrease in the FVC (hazard ratio [HR] 2.90, 95% CI 1.25–6.73; P = 0.014) and de novo development of extensive disease (HR 3.71, 95% CI 1.02–13.52; P = 0.048). Matrix‐based logistic regression models for the diagnosis and prognosis of SSc‐associated ILD were constructed, and these models discriminated 3 groups of risk (mild, moderate, or high) for the diagnosis or worsening of lung fibrosis according to the serum levels of SP‐D (for diagnosis) and serum levels of CCL18 (for progression of disease). Conclusion These results show that SP‐D is a relevant diagnostic biomarker for SSc‐associated ILD, whereas KL‐6 could be used to assess the severity of lung fibrosis. CCL18 appears to be a potential predictive marker for progression of ILD in SSc.
ISSN:2326-5191
2326-5205
DOI:10.1002/art.40815