Loading…
Predicting Ligand Interactions with ABC Transporters in ADME
ABC‐type drug efflux pumps, e.g., ABCB1 (=P‐glycoprotein, =MDR1), ABCC1 (=MRP1), and ABCG2 (=MXR, =BCRP), confer a multi‐drug resistance (MDR) phenotype to cancer cells. Furthermore, the important contribution of ABC transporters for bioavailability, distribution, elimination, and blood–brain barrie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemistry & biodiversity 2009-11, Vol.6 (11), p.1960-1969 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABC‐type drug efflux pumps, e.g., ABCB1 (=P‐glycoprotein, =MDR1), ABCC1 (=MRP1), and ABCG2 (=MXR, =BCRP), confer a multi‐drug resistance (MDR) phenotype to cancer cells. Furthermore, the important contribution of ABC transporters for bioavailability, distribution, elimination, and blood–brain barrier permeation of drug candidates is increasingly recognized.
This review presents an overview on the different computational methods and models pursued to predict ABC transporter substrate properties of drug‐like compounds. They encompass ligand‐based approaches ranging from ‘simple rule’‐based efforts to sophisticated machine learning methods. Many of these models show excellent performance for the data sets used. However, due to the complex nature of the applied methods, useful interpretation of the models that can be directly translated into chemical structures by the medicinal chemist is rather difficult.
Additionally, very recent and promising attempts in the field of structure‐based modeling of ABC transporters, which embody homology modeling as well as recently published X‐ray structures of murine ABCB1, will be discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1612-1872 1612-1880 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cbdv.200900138 |