Loading…
Predicting Wall Thickness Loss in Water Pipes Using Machine Learning Techniques
Wall thickness loss in water pipes has been found to be positively correlated with water pipe failure. The reliability of water pipes reduces as their wall thickness loss increases. Although previous studies have investigated pipe failure modeling using historical failure data, however, indirect fai...
Saved in:
Published in: | ce/papers 2023-09, Vol.6 (5), p.1087-1092 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Wall thickness loss in water pipes has been found to be positively correlated with water pipe failure. The reliability of water pipes reduces as their wall thickness loss increases. Although previous studies have investigated pipe failure modeling using historical failure data, however, indirect failure modeling via wall thickness loss is yet to be explored. Hence, this study develops machine learning (ML) models to predict wall thickness loss in water pipes. Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) are chosen as the base models and are integrated with Bayesian Optimization (BO) algorithm for hyperparameters selection. The predictive models are evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MEA), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R2). Based on the evaluation metrics, the hybrid models (i.e., RF+ BO and GBM+BO) outperformed the base models (RF and GBM), showing the importance of the systematic selection of hyperparameters. The best model (RF + BO) achieved an RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R2 value of 3.212, 2.494, 11.506, and 0.910, respectively. These metrics show the high predictive capability of the model, which can be used by water infrastructure management to predict wall thickness loss in water pipes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2509-7075 2509-7075 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cepa.2075 |