Loading…

Origin of the S N 2 Benzylic Effect: Contributions by π Delocalization and Field/Inductive Effects

Historically, the S N 2 benzylic effect is attributed to a conjugative stabilization between the phenyl ring and the reaction center in the transition state. However, recent papers have cast doubt on this explanation. We have therefore investigated the origin of the S N 2 benzylic effect for two dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of organic chemistry 2012-10, Vol.2012 (30), p.5991-6004
Main Authors: Rawlings, Robert E., McKerlie, Adam K., Bates, Daniel J., Mo, Yirong, Karty, Joel M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Historically, the S N 2 benzylic effect is attributed to a conjugative stabilization between the phenyl ring and the reaction center in the transition state. However, recent papers have cast doubt on this explanation. We have therefore investigated the origin of the S N 2 benzylic effect for two different gas‐phase S N 2 reactions, F – + C 6 H 5 CH 2 F and Cl – + C 6 H 5 CH 2 Cl, by carrying out two separate computational methodologies on each system – a vinylogue extrapolation (VE) methodology and a block‐localized wavefunction (BLW) methodology. The contributions we examined were (1) delocalization involving the ring's π system, and (2) field/inductive effects of the ring. For the fluoride and chloride reactions, the VE methodology suggests that delocalization contributes to a lowering of the reaction's energy barrier by 3.1 and 1.7 kcal/mol, respectively, and the BLW calculations suggest that delocalization contributes to lowering the barrier by 3.65 and 5.47 kcal/mol, respectively. Both methodologies therefore agree that π delocalization is a significant contributor to the benzylic effect. Furthermore, the VE methodology indicates that field/inductive effects also contribute to lowering the barriers by 2.2 and 3.2 kcal/mol, suggesting that a separate repulsive interaction serves to increase the barrier by 1.5 and 3.3 kcal/mol, respectively.
ISSN:1434-193X
1099-0690
DOI:10.1002/ejoc.201200880