Loading…
Distinct concentration‐discharge dynamics in temperate streams and rivers: CO 2 exhibits chemostasis while CH 4 exhibits source limitation due to temperature control
Streams and rivers are significant sources of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) to the atmosphere. However, the magnitudes of these fluxes are uncertain, in part, because dissolved greenhouse gases (GHGs) can exhibit high spatiotemporal variability. Concentration‐discharge ( C ‐ Q ) relatio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Limnology and oceanography 2021-10, Vol.66 (10), p.3656-3668 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Streams and rivers are significant sources of carbon dioxide (CO
2
) and methane (CH
4
) to the atmosphere. However, the magnitudes of these fluxes are uncertain, in part, because dissolved greenhouse gases (GHGs) can exhibit high spatiotemporal variability. Concentration‐discharge (
C
‐
Q
) relationships are commonly used to describe temporal variability stemming from hydrologic controls on solute production and transport. This study assesses how the partial pressures of two GHGs—
p
CO
2
and
p
CH
4
—vary across hydrologic conditions over 4 yr in eight nested streams and rivers, at both annual and seasonal timescales. Overall, the range of
p
CO
2
was constrained, ranging from undersaturated to nine times oversaturated, while
p
CH
4
was highly variable, ranging from 3 to 500 times oversaturated. We show that
p
CO
2
exhibited chemostatic behavior (i.e., no change with
Q
), in part, due to carbonate buffering and seasonally specific storm responses. In contrast, we show that
p
CH
4
generally exhibited source limitation (i.e., a negative relationship with
Q
), which we attribute to temperature‐mediated production. However,
p
CH
4
exhibited chemostasis in a wetland‐draining stream, likely due to hydrologic connection to the CH
4
‐rich wetland. These findings have implications for CO
2
and CH
4
fluxes, which are controlled by concentrations and gas transfer velocities. At high
Q
, enhanced gas transfer velocity acts on a relatively constant CO
2
stock but on a diminishing CH
4
stock. In other words, CO
2
fluxes increase with
Q
, while CH
4
fluxes are modulated by the divergent
Q
dynamics of gas transfer velocity and concentration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-3590 1939-5590 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lno.11906 |