Loading…

Comparing Optimization Algorithms for Shape Optimization of Extrusion Dies

The classical approach to extrusion die design relies heavily on the experience of the die designer; Especially the designer's ability to create an initial die design from a product design, the designer's constructional knowledge and performance during the running‐in trials. Furthermore, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics 2014-12, Vol.14 (1), p.789-794
Main Authors: Siegbert, Roland, Kitschke, Johannes, Djelassi, Hatim, Behr, Marek, Elgeti, Stefanie
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The classical approach to extrusion die design relies heavily on the experience of the die designer; Especially the designer's ability to create an initial die design from a product design, the designer's constructional knowledge and performance during the running‐in trials. Furthermore, the relative unpredictability of the running‐in trials combined with the additional resource usage introduce uncertainties and delays in the time‐to‐market of a given product. To lower these delays and resource usage, extrusion die design can benefit greatly from numerical shape optimization. In this application, however, plastics melts pose a difficult obstacle, due to their rather unintuitive and nonlinear behavior. These properties complicate the numerical optimization process, which mimics running‐in trials and relies on a minimal number of optimization iterations. As part of the Cluster of Excellence Integrative Production Technologies for High‐Wage Countries at the RWTH Aachen University, an effort is made to shorten the manual running‐in process by the means of numerical shape optimization. Using an in‐house numerical shape optimization framework, a set of optimization algorithms, consisting of global, derivative‐free and gradient‐based optimizers, are evaluated with respect to the best die quality and a minimal number of optimization iterations. This evaluation is an important step on the way to include more computationally intensive material models into the optimization framework and identify the best possible optimization strategy for the numerical design of extrusion dies. (© 2014 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
ISSN:1617-7061
1617-7061
DOI:10.1002/pamm.201410377