Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis

Non‐randomized studies aim to reveal whether or not interventions are effective in real‐life clinical practice, and there is a growing interest in including such evidence in the decision‐making process. We evaluate existing methodologies and present new approaches to using non‐randomized evidence in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistics in medicine 2017-04, Vol.36 (8), p.1210-1226
Main Authors: Efthimiou, Orestis, Mavridis, Dimitris, Debray, Thomas P. A., Samara, Myrto, Belger, Mark, Siontis, George C. M., Leucht, Stefan, Salanti, Georgia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical medicine
Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data
cohort studies
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Humans
Medical statistics
Meta-analysis
mixed treatment comparison
Models, Statistical
multiple treatments meta‐analysis
Network Meta-Analysis as Topic
observational data
observational evidence
observational studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Statistics as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!