Loading…
A Pentagonal Number Sieve
We prove a general “pentagonal sieve” theorem that has corollaries such as the following. First, the number of pairs of partitions of n that have no parts in common isp(n)2−p(n−1)2−p(n−2)2+p(n−5)2+p(n−7)2−….Second, if two unlabeled rooted forests of the same number of vertices are chosen i.u.a.r., t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of combinatorial theory. Series A 1998-05, Vol.82 (2), p.186-192 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We prove a general “pentagonal sieve” theorem that has corollaries such as the following. First, the number of pairs of partitions of n that have no parts in common isp(n)2−p(n−1)2−p(n−2)2+p(n−5)2+p(n−7)2−….Second, if two unlabeled rooted forests of the same number of vertices are chosen i.u.a.r., then the probability that they have no common tree is .8705… . Third, iff,gare two monic polynomials of the same degree over the fieldGF(q), then the probability thatf,gare relatively prime is 1−1/q. We give explicit involutions for the pentagonal sieve theorem, generalizing earlier mappings found by Bressoud and Zeilberger. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0097-3165 1096-0899 |
DOI: | 10.1006/jcta.1997.2846 |