Loading…
Controlled clinical trial of cadralazine as a second-step drug in the treatment of hypertension
The antihypertensive efficacy of a new long-lasting vasodilator, cadralazine, and the diuretic chlorthalidone have been compared in hypertensive patients receiving concurrent treatment with atenolol. After a 4-week run-in period with atenolol alone 100 mg/day, two groups of 10 patients whose diastol...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of clinical pharmacology 1985-01, Vol.28 (2), p.135-138 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8507ba0b06b25c98a88dea6fd250241b5386b2703b433462a0da6f4140d8b2cf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8507ba0b06b25c98a88dea6fd250241b5386b2703b433462a0da6f4140d8b2cf3 |
container_end_page | 138 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | European journal of clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | CATALANO, M PARINI, J ROMANO, M LIBRETTI, A |
description | The antihypertensive efficacy of a new long-lasting vasodilator, cadralazine, and the diuretic chlorthalidone have been compared in hypertensive patients receiving concurrent treatment with atenolol. After a 4-week run-in period with atenolol alone 100 mg/day, two groups of 10 patients whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 100 mm Hg were given for a period of 65 days either cadralazine 15 mg/day or chlorthalidone 25 mg/day, according to a randomized, double-blind, between-patients design. Compared to atenolol alone, both cadralazine and chlorthalidone induced a statistically and clinically significant decrease in blood pressure. The antihypertensive effect did not differ significantly between groups. Good compensation of the atenolol-induced decrease in heart rate was obtained with cadralazine, whereas during atenolol + chlorthalidone treatment at times the standing heart rate was significantly lower than during treatment with atenolol + cadralazine. Side-effects, many of which were already present during atenolol treatment, occurred with a similar frequency in both groups. It is concluded that atenolol + cadralazine and atenolol + chlorthalidone are equally well tolerated, acceptable and effective in the treatment of hypertension, but that further studies are warranted to explore the potential haemodynamic advantages of the cadralazine + atenolol combination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00609680 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00609680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3886402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8507ba0b06b25c98a88dea6fd250241b5386b2703b433462a0da6f4140d8b2cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkLFOwzAQQC0EKqWwsCN5YEIKnGPHcUaoKCBVYoE5utgONUqdyHaH8vVN1aosd8N7d8Mj5JbBIwMon14WABIqqeCMTJngecZAsHMyBeAsk1UJl-Qqxl8AVlTAJ2TClZIC8imp571Poe86a6junHcaO5qCG2ffUo0mYId_zluKkSKNVvfeZDHZgZqw-aHO07Sy44XFtLY-7a9W28GGZH10vb8mFy120d4c94x8L16_5u_Z8vPtY_68zDRnLGWqgLJBaEA2eaErhUoZi7I1eQG5YE3B1UhK4I3gXMgcwYxUMAFGNblu-Yw8HP7q0McYbFsPwa0xbGsG9T5S_R9plO8O8rBp1tac1GOVkd8fOcaxRxvQaxdPWsUqIVjBd2QvbiE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controlled clinical trial of cadralazine as a second-step drug in the treatment of hypertension</title><source>Springer LINK Archives</source><creator>CATALANO, M ; PARINI, J ; ROMANO, M ; LIBRETTI, A</creator><creatorcontrib>CATALANO, M ; PARINI, J ; ROMANO, M ; LIBRETTI, A</creatorcontrib><description>The antihypertensive efficacy of a new long-lasting vasodilator, cadralazine, and the diuretic chlorthalidone have been compared in hypertensive patients receiving concurrent treatment with atenolol. After a 4-week run-in period with atenolol alone 100 mg/day, two groups of 10 patients whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 100 mm Hg were given for a period of 65 days either cadralazine 15 mg/day or chlorthalidone 25 mg/day, according to a randomized, double-blind, between-patients design. Compared to atenolol alone, both cadralazine and chlorthalidone induced a statistically and clinically significant decrease in blood pressure. The antihypertensive effect did not differ significantly between groups. Good compensation of the atenolol-induced decrease in heart rate was obtained with cadralazine, whereas during atenolol + chlorthalidone treatment at times the standing heart rate was significantly lower than during treatment with atenolol + cadralazine. Side-effects, many of which were already present during atenolol treatment, occurred with a similar frequency in both groups. It is concluded that atenolol + cadralazine and atenolol + chlorthalidone are equally well tolerated, acceptable and effective in the treatment of hypertension, but that further studies are warranted to explore the potential haemodynamic advantages of the cadralazine + atenolol combination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-6970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00609680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3886402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Antihypertensive agents ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Atenolol - administration & dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Cardiovascular system ; Chlorthalidone - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Humans ; Hypertension - drug therapy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pyridazines - adverse effects ; Pyridazines - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1985-01, Vol.28 (2), p.135-138</ispartof><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8507ba0b06b25c98a88dea6fd250241b5386b2703b433462a0da6f4140d8b2cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8507ba0b06b25c98a88dea6fd250241b5386b2703b433462a0da6f4140d8b2cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9194415$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3886402$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CATALANO, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARINI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIBRETTI, A</creatorcontrib><title>Controlled clinical trial of cadralazine as a second-step drug in the treatment of hypertension</title><title>European journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>The antihypertensive efficacy of a new long-lasting vasodilator, cadralazine, and the diuretic chlorthalidone have been compared in hypertensive patients receiving concurrent treatment with atenolol. After a 4-week run-in period with atenolol alone 100 mg/day, two groups of 10 patients whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 100 mm Hg were given for a period of 65 days either cadralazine 15 mg/day or chlorthalidone 25 mg/day, according to a randomized, double-blind, between-patients design. Compared to atenolol alone, both cadralazine and chlorthalidone induced a statistically and clinically significant decrease in blood pressure. The antihypertensive effect did not differ significantly between groups. Good compensation of the atenolol-induced decrease in heart rate was obtained with cadralazine, whereas during atenolol + chlorthalidone treatment at times the standing heart rate was significantly lower than during treatment with atenolol + cadralazine. Side-effects, many of which were already present during atenolol treatment, occurred with a similar frequency in both groups. It is concluded that atenolol + cadralazine and atenolol + chlorthalidone are equally well tolerated, acceptable and effective in the treatment of hypertension, but that further studies are warranted to explore the potential haemodynamic advantages of the cadralazine + atenolol combination.</description><subject>Antihypertensive agents</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Atenolol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Chlorthalidone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pyridazines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pyridazines - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0031-6970</issn><issn>1432-1041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkLFOwzAQQC0EKqWwsCN5YEIKnGPHcUaoKCBVYoE5utgONUqdyHaH8vVN1aosd8N7d8Mj5JbBIwMon14WABIqqeCMTJngecZAsHMyBeAsk1UJl-Qqxl8AVlTAJ2TClZIC8imp571Poe86a6junHcaO5qCG2ffUo0mYId_zluKkSKNVvfeZDHZgZqw-aHO07Sy44XFtLY-7a9W28GGZH10vb8mFy120d4c94x8L16_5u_Z8vPtY_68zDRnLGWqgLJBaEA2eaErhUoZi7I1eQG5YE3B1UhK4I3gXMgcwYxUMAFGNblu-Yw8HP7q0McYbFsPwa0xbGsG9T5S_R9plO8O8rBp1tac1GOVkd8fOcaxRxvQaxdPWsUqIVjBd2QvbiE</recordid><startdate>19850101</startdate><enddate>19850101</enddate><creator>CATALANO, M</creator><creator>PARINI, J</creator><creator>ROMANO, M</creator><creator>LIBRETTI, A</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850101</creationdate><title>Controlled clinical trial of cadralazine as a second-step drug in the treatment of hypertension</title><author>CATALANO, M ; PARINI, J ; ROMANO, M ; LIBRETTI, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8507ba0b06b25c98a88dea6fd250241b5386b2703b433462a0da6f4140d8b2cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Antihypertensive agents</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Atenolol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Chlorthalidone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pyridazines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pyridazines - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CATALANO, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARINI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIBRETTI, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CATALANO, M</au><au>PARINI, J</au><au>ROMANO, M</au><au>LIBRETTI, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controlled clinical trial of cadralazine as a second-step drug in the treatment of hypertension</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1985-01-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>135-138</pages><issn>0031-6970</issn><eissn>1432-1041</eissn><abstract>The antihypertensive efficacy of a new long-lasting vasodilator, cadralazine, and the diuretic chlorthalidone have been compared in hypertensive patients receiving concurrent treatment with atenolol. After a 4-week run-in period with atenolol alone 100 mg/day, two groups of 10 patients whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 100 mm Hg were given for a period of 65 days either cadralazine 15 mg/day or chlorthalidone 25 mg/day, according to a randomized, double-blind, between-patients design. Compared to atenolol alone, both cadralazine and chlorthalidone induced a statistically and clinically significant decrease in blood pressure. The antihypertensive effect did not differ significantly between groups. Good compensation of the atenolol-induced decrease in heart rate was obtained with cadralazine, whereas during atenolol + chlorthalidone treatment at times the standing heart rate was significantly lower than during treatment with atenolol + cadralazine. Side-effects, many of which were already present during atenolol treatment, occurred with a similar frequency in both groups. It is concluded that atenolol + cadralazine and atenolol + chlorthalidone are equally well tolerated, acceptable and effective in the treatment of hypertension, but that further studies are warranted to explore the potential haemodynamic advantages of the cadralazine + atenolol combination.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>3886402</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00609680</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-6970 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1985-01, Vol.28 (2), p.135-138 |
issn | 0031-6970 1432-1041 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00609680 |
source | Springer LINK Archives |
subjects | Antihypertensive agents Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use Atenolol - administration & dosage Biological and medical sciences Blood Pressure - drug effects Cardiovascular system Chlorthalidone - therapeutic use Clinical Trials as Topic Drug Therapy, Combination Female Heart Rate - drug effects Humans Hypertension - drug therapy Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pyridazines - adverse effects Pyridazines - therapeutic use |
title | Controlled clinical trial of cadralazine as a second-step drug in the treatment of hypertension |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controlled%20clinical%20trial%20of%20cadralazine%20as%20a%20second-step%20drug%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20hypertension&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=CATALANO,%20M&rft.date=1985-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=135-138&rft.issn=0031-6970&rft.eissn=1432-1041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00609680&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E3886402%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8507ba0b06b25c98a88dea6fd250241b5386b2703b433462a0da6f4140d8b2cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/3886402&rfr_iscdi=true |