Loading…
The Euclidean Adler function and its interplay with $$ \Delta {\alpha}_{\textrm{QED}}^{\textrm{had}} $$ and αs
Three different approaches to precisely describe the Adler function in the Euclidean regime at around 2 GeVs are available: dispersion relations based on the hadronic production data in e + e − annihilation, lattice simulations and perturbative QCD (pQCD). We make a comprehensive study of the pertur...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of high energy physics 2023-04, Vol.2023 (4), Article 67 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Three different approaches to precisely describe the Adler function in the Euclidean regime at around 2 GeVs are available: dispersion relations based on the hadronic production data in
e
+
e
−
annihilation, lattice simulations and perturbative QCD (pQCD). We make a comprehensive study of the perturbative approach, supplemented with the leading power corrections in the operator product expansion. All known contributions are included, with a careful assessment of uncertainties. The pQCD predictions are compared with the Adler functions extracted from
$$ \Delta {\alpha}_{\textrm{QED}}^{\textrm{had}} $$
Δ
α
QED
had
(
Q
2
), using both the DHMZ compilation of
e
+
e
−
data and published lattice results. Taking as input the FLAG value of
α
s
, the pQCD Adler function turns out to be in good agreement with the lattice data, while the dispersive results lie systematically below them. Finally, we explore the sensitivity to
α
s
of the direct comparison between the data-driven, lattice and QCD Euclidean Adler functions. The precision with which the renormalisation group equation can be tested is also evaluated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1029-8479 1029-8479 |
DOI: | 10.1007/JHEP04(2023)067 |