Loading…

Current use of anticholinergic medications in a large naturalistic sample of psychiatric patients

Due to the high number of psychotropic drugs with anticholinergic potential, patients taking psychotropic drugs are at high risk for anticholinergic adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and type of pharmacodynamic anticholinergic drug–drug interactions i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Neural Transmission 2021-02, Vol.128 (2), p.263-272
Main Authors: Toto, Sermin, Hefner, Gudrun, Hahn, Martina, Hiemke, Christoph, Roll, Sibylle C., Wolff, Jan, Klimke, Ansgar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Due to the high number of psychotropic drugs with anticholinergic potential, patients taking psychotropic drugs are at high risk for anticholinergic adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and type of pharmacodynamic anticholinergic drug–drug interactions in psychiatric patients. The retrospective longitudinal analysis used data from a large pharmacovigilance study conducted in ten German psychiatric hospitals. Anticholinergic burden of drugs was defined as “strong” or “moderate” based on current literature. Number and type of anticholinergic drugs were assessed. In total, 27,396 patient cases (45.6% female) with a mean age of 47.3 ± 18.3 years were included. 17.4% ( n  = 4760) of patients were ≥ 64 years. 35.4% of the patients received between one and four anticholinergic drugs simultaneously. A combination of drugs with anticholinergic potential was detected in 1738 cases (6.3%). Most prescribed drugs were promethazine ( n  = 2996), olanzapine ( n  = 2561), biperiden ( n  = 1074), and doxepin ( n  = 963). Patients receiving anticholinergic combinations were younger (45.7 vs. 47.4 years, p  
ISSN:0300-9564
1435-1463
DOI:10.1007/s00702-020-02298-5