Loading…

Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Coupled with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Determination of Coumarin Compounds in Radix Angelicae Dahuricae

In this paper, two methods, organic solvent dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (OS-DLLME) and ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL-DLLME), coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography have been critically compared and introduced for the analysis of the eight coumari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chromatographia 2012-02, Vol.75 (3-4), p.131-137
Main Authors: Li, Li Hua, Zhang, Hong Fen, Hu, Shuang, Bai, Xiao Hong, Li, Shang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, two methods, organic solvent dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (OS-DLLME) and ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL-DLLME), coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography have been critically compared and introduced for the analysis of the eight coumarin compounds (psoralen, isopsoralen, bergapten, isobergapten, oxypeucedanin, imperatorin, osthole, and isoimperatorin) in Radix Angelicae Dahuricae samples. Experimental conditions have been investigated for both OS-DLLME and IL-DLLME. Under optimal conditions, the detection limits of the eight coumarin compounds obtained by OS-DLLME and IL-DLLME ranged between 0.002–0.026 ng mL −1 and 0.013–0.66 ng mL −1 , respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs, n  = 9) were lower than 8.7 and 8.4% with enrichment factors in the range of 145–380 and 130–230 folds for OS-DLLME and IL-DLLME, respectively. The results showed that there were no significant deviations between the two DLLME methods for the determination of the eight coumarin compounds. Both methods were simple, fast, efficient, and inexpensive. However, compared with IL-DLLME, the OS-DLLME technique exhibited a higher extraction capacity for the eight target analytes.
ISSN:0009-5893
1612-1112
DOI:10.1007/s10337-011-2177-1