Loading…
Fabrication and characterisation of nanocrystalline composites of Ca1−xCoxMoO4 (x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1) prepared by co-precipitation method as a humidity sensor
The effect of substitution of scheelite structure of calcium–cobalt molybdate (CaCM, Ca 1−x Co x MoO 4 ; x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1) for humidity sensor application was studied. The composites were prepared using a co-precipitation method with different mole ratios. As-prepared composites were studied...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of materials science. Materials in electronics 2017-02, Vol.28 (4), p.3548-3559 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The effect of substitution of scheelite structure of calcium–cobalt molybdate (CaCM, Ca
1−x
Co
x
MoO
4
; x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1) for humidity sensor application was studied. The composites were prepared using a co-precipitation method with different mole ratios. As-prepared composites were studied by TG/DTA analyses to find out the sintering temperature of the prepared the composites. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed in order to identify phase composition and crystallite structure. The composites were characterised by Fourier Transform-Infrared spectroscopy, Fourier Transform-Raman spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and UV–visible absorption spectroscopy. Surface area of composites was studied using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. The composites were subjected to solid-state
dc
electrical conductivity for humidity sensing at room temperature. The resistance measurements as a function of relative humidity (RH) in the range of 5–98% were carried out and the sensitivity factors (
S
f
=
R
5%
/
R
98%
) were calculated. Our results showed high sensitivity (S
f
) of Ca
0.7
Co
0.3
MoO
4
(CaCM-2) as 5252 ± 157 compared with that of the end composites CaMoO
4
(CaM-1) and CoMoO
4
(CoM-5). The response and recovery times of CaCM-2 showed 150 and 110 s, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0957-4522 1573-482X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10854-016-5956-5 |