Loading…
Budget-constrained minimum cost flows
We study an extension of the well-known minimum cost flow problem in which a second kind of costs (called usage fees ) is associated with each edge. The goal is to minimize the first kind of costs as in traditional minimum cost flows while the total usage fee of a flow must additionally fulfill a bu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of combinatorial optimization 2016-05, Vol.31 (4), p.1720-1745 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We study an extension of the well-known minimum cost flow problem in which a second kind of costs (called
usage fees
) is associated with each edge. The goal is to minimize the first kind of costs as in traditional minimum cost flows while the total usage fee of a flow must additionally fulfill a budget constraint. We distinguish three variants of computing the usage fees. The continuous case, in which the usage fee incurred on an edge depends linearly on the flow on the edge, can be seen as the
ε
-constraint method applied to the bicriteria minimum cost flow problem. We present the first strongly polynomial-time algorithm for this problem. In the integral case, in which the fees are incurred in integral steps, we show weak
NP
-hardness of solving and approximating the problem on series-parallel graphs and present a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm for this graph class. Furthermore, we present a PTAS, an FPTAS, and a polynomial-time algorithm for several special cases on extension-parallel graphs. Finally, we show that the binary case, in which a fixed fee is payed for the usage of each edge independently of the amount of flow (as for
fixed cost flows
—Hochbaum and Segev in Networks 19(3):291–312,
1989
), is strongly
NP
-hard to solve and we adapt several results from the integral case. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1382-6905 1573-2886 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10878-015-9865-y |