Loading…
Landscape structure as a mediator of ecosystem service interactions
Context Management of multiple ecosystem services (ES) is complex, in part due to synergies and trade-offs among ES. Landscape configuration—the spatial arrangement of patches in a landscape—affects the provision of many ES, and may also influence the strength and direction of these interactions. Un...
Saved in:
Published in: | Landscape ecology 2020-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2863-2880 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Context
Management of multiple ecosystem services (ES) is complex, in part due to synergies and trade-offs among ES. Landscape configuration—the spatial arrangement of patches in a landscape—affects the provision of many ES, and may also influence the strength and direction of these interactions. Understanding how landscape configuration can influence ES interactions may provide landscape managers with a tool to promote positive interactions and avoid negative interactions among ES.
Objectives
We investigate the relationship between ES, their interactions, and landscape configuration across the Montérégie region of Québec, Canada. Through this, we explore the potential for landscape configuration to serve as a tool to mediate ES interactions.
Methods
We quantified seven ES at a 30 m spatial resolution across the Montérégie region of Québec, Canada. The strength and direction of pairwise correlations in ES provision was compared across five classes of landscape configuration.
Results
We found significant variation in response to landscape configuration for almost all pairwise ES interactions. In some cases, two ES showed a trade-off in one type of landscape and a synergy in another. Response to landscape configuration varied by ES, and no single type of landscape configuration was better overall at promoting synergies and reducing trade-offs.
Conclusions
The effect of landscape configuration was relatively small compared to the effect of land use and land cover. However, directed manipulation of landscape configuration may allow managers to enhance the provision of specific ES, or influence the strength and direction of interactions between specific pairs of ES. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10980-020-01117-2 |