Informative Jury Disagreement

The article introduces a counterintuitive argument, contending that jury disagreement on the defendant’s guilt—a nonunanimous conviction—may well provide a more informative signal, compared to consensus. Because stronger consensus implies higher likelihood of herding, it is shown that beyond some th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and philosophy 2025-11
Main Author: Baharad, Roy
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!