Loading…
The influence of isomorphous substitution on the cation distribution in faujasite-type zeolites; The structures of dehydrated Na-LZ210 and hydrated KGaY
The structures of dehydrated Na-exchanged LZ210 ( Si Al = 4.8; 623 K) and of hydrated KGaY zeolites were determined using X-ray powder diffraction methods. The changed distribution relating to Y-zeolites, reflects the framework-cation interaction energies, which are due to a change in the Si/Al rati...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of physics and chemistry of solids 1989, Vol.50 (5), p.469-477 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The structures of dehydrated Na-exchanged LZ210
(
Si
Al
= 4.8; 623
K)
and of hydrated KGaY zeolites were determined using X-ray powder diffraction methods. The changed distribution relating to Y-zeolites, reflects the framework-cation interaction energies, which are due to a change in the Si/Al ratio (NaLZ210) or to a substitution of the aluminum ions for gallium ions (KGaY). For dehydrated Na-exchanged faujasite-type zeolites, the site preferences are:
I >
II >
I' (high aluminum content,
J. phys. Chem.
92, 6747, 1988);
II >
I' >
I (low aluminum content). Based on a previously determined statistical thermodynamical model (
J. phys. Chem.
92, 6740, 1988), it can be inferred that the cation distribution at high cation loadings is largely determined by the interaction energy of the cations on adjacent sites I and I'. All available literature data on dehydrated sodium-exchanged faujasite-type structures are rationalized on the basis of this model, and energy level differences as well as interaction energies are fitted.
Isomorphous substitution of Al by Ga reduces the framework-cation interaction energy, which may be explained by a higher covalency of the framework. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3697 1879-2553 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0022-3697(89)90426-5 |